MC BYGG AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
57of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 65 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 9,017 of 25,886 · Bygg og anlegg
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 80 and solidity 36 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
MC BYGG AS is 7 points above the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 25,101 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 11.2% (median 3.6%) and equity ratio 26.8% (median 34.1%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 7 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 11.2% | 3.6% |
| Profit margin | 11.2% | 3.3% |
| Return on assets | 32.9% | 5.6% |
| Equity ratio | 26.8% | 34.1% |
| Debt-to-equity | 2.74 | 1.29 |
| Current ratio | 1.37 | 1.40 |
| Revenue growth | – | 4.2% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.43 MNOK | 1.42 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 57, MC BYGG AS does better than 65% of small companies in the same sector (25,321 companies) in 2025.
Score over time
Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.
MC BYGG AS has a score of 57 for 2025, rank 9,017 of 25,886 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 80 against peers, operating margin 11.2% against a median of 3.6%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 36 against peers, equity ratio 26.8% against a median of 34.1%.
Worth a closer look
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
MC BYGG AS had an operating margin of 11.2% and an equity ratio of 26.8% in 2025, and ranks 9,017 of 25,886 in Bygg og anlegg.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 1 MNOK and 6 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 6 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | 6 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.0 | 1 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 2.1%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 80 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 36 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 49 | weight 15% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 57 | weight 15% |
Index version 2. Data completeness 85%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is MC BYGG AS?
The operating margin was 11.2% in 2025, against a median of 3.6% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 32.9%.
How solid is MC BYGG AS?
The equity ratio was 26.8% in 2025 (median 34.1%). Debt-to-equity was 2.74 (median 1.29).
What is the liquidity of MC BYGG AS like?
The current ratio was 1.37 in 2025 (median 1.40).
How does MC BYGG AS compare in Bygg og anlegg?
MC BYGG AS ranks 9,017 of 25,886 in Bygg og anlegg for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 8,766 of 25,321.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 935624967
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Bygg og anlegg (41.000)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 16 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 20 May 2025 1 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Nipedalen 70, 5164 LAKSEVÅG (BERGEN)
- Municipality
- Bergen rank 9 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 4 June 2025
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Oksana Domkova
- Chair of the board
- Oksana Domkova
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 25 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 28 October 2026.
Year by year
Trends appear once there is more than one fiscal year.
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 6.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.8 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.8 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.6 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 2.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 2.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 28 October 2026, accounts id 7197293.
Further
Similar companies
- MANDAL BYGG AS index 57, rank 9,015 · compare
- BYGGMESTER TROND FINSÅDAL AS index 57, rank 9,016 · compare
- ENTREPRENØR K HOLSETER AS index 57, rank 9,018 · compare
- GRENDEBYGG AS index 57, rank 9,019 · compare
- MR FUG BRANNSIKRING AS index 57, rank 9,020 · compare