Eugen Eide AS

Org. no. 986870377 · Trondheim · Founded 2004

Morning Enterprise Index

No annual accounts have been fetched for this company yet.

Source: Register of Company Accounts and Central Coordinating RegisterReport an issue

From the Central Coordinating Register

Org. no.
986870377
Legal form
AS
Sector
Helse og omsorg (86.221)
Employees
0–4 (not registered)
Founded
15 April 2004 22 years in operation
Share capital
0.10 MNOK
Business address
Ranheimsvegen 143A, 7055 RANHEIM (TRONDHEIM)
Municipality
Trondheim rank 3 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
Audit
Audit opted out from 9 December 2014
Latest accounts filed
2025
LEI
549300ANCYAXIXQVA806 renews 29 August 2027
The company's business municipality, Trondheim. The map shows the municipality, not the address. Map source: Kartverket (CC BY 4.0).

Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre

Ownership and roles

Loading roles …

Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.

Parent company
No parent company: owned by persons

Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.

Shareholders (2025)

Number of shareholders
1 (one owner)
Largest owner
100.0%
Split
companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
Owned from the same municipality
100%
Group chain
Ultimate owner: private person

Change 2007–2025: no material change in the owners.

Holds shares in: Global Infrastruktur i AS (0%), Bulbitech AS (2%), Kraft Private Equity 2024 AS (0%), Trondheim Areal Invest AS (0%), Offentlig Eiendomsinvest i AS (0%), Kristiansund Etatbygg AS (1%), Vestlandet Kommunebygg AS (0%), Trondheim Kontoreiendom AS (0%)

Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.

Error in the data?

Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.

Report an issue