Supplier assessment

L Hals Eftf AS

Org. no. 848639052 · Handel · SURNADAL

Grade E High risk in the figures

Points76 of 100, weighted

Public contracts0 last 5 years, 0 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The company is bankrupt or being wound up. The grade is set to E.

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · AI-generated

L Hals Eftf AS has grade E because the company is registered as bankrupt or being wound up, even though its accounts figures are strong.

The grade E is set by a hard signal: the company is bankrupt or being wound up. The 2025 accounts show an equity ratio of 70.1% and a current ratio of 3.32, but these figures cannot show whether the company can deliver now. The score of 76 out of 100 reflects the accounts and track record, while the grade follows the fixed rule.

Strengths

The equity ratio of 70.1% is well above the industry median of 36.3%.
The current ratio of 3.32 and a solidity and liquidity score of 100 each point to strong short-term coverage in the 2025 accounts.
The company was founded in 1988 and reported revenue of 17.1 MNOK with revenue growth of 2.8%.

Risks

The company is bankrupt or being wound up, which is the reason the grade is set to E.
The operating margin of 2.0% is below the industry median of 3.4%, and profitability scored 55.
The company has won 0 public contracts in the last 5 years, so there is no public-sector delivery record in these figures.

Questions to ask

Can the buyer confirm the current legal status of the company in the official registers before any further step?
Is it possible to request a bank guarantee or parent company guarantee, if the buyer still wants to consider the supplier?
Can the supplier provide updated accounts or a statement of its capacity to deliver?
Are there references from private customers that show past delivery performance?

This text was written by artificial intelligence (AI) on 4 November 2026 from the figures on this page. Every number in it has been checked against the database. AI can still phrase things imprecisely: read it as a starting point, not a conclusion.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	100	30 %	Equity ratio 70.1%
Liquidity	100	20 %	Current ratio 3.32
Profitability	55	20 %	Operating margin 2.0%
Size and capacity	70	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	40	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

We find no contracts in Doffin in the last 5 years. The company may not have supplied the public sector, or its contracts were below the thresholds.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.