Supplier assessment

T-2 Prosjekt AS

Org. no. 880120522 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning · OSLO · 17 employees

Grade A Very solid basis

Points90 of 100, weighted

Public contracts6 last 5 years, 5 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · written from fixed rules

T-2 Prosjekt AS gets grade A on the figures.

The accounts show good solidity and liquidity, and the figures give a buyer little cause for concern.

Strengths

The equity ratio is 62.6%, which gives a good buffer against losses.
The current ratio is 2.67: current assets cover current liabilities well.
The operating margin is 13.9%.
The company has won 6 public contracts from 5 different buyers in the last 5 years.

Risks

The largest contract is large compared with revenue.

Questions to ask

Clarify capacity: staffing, subcontractors and other commitments.

This text is put together from fixed sentences. An AI-generated assessment follows once it has been written and checked.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	100	30 %	Equity ratio 62.6%
Liquidity	100	20 %	Current ratio 2.67
Profitability	100	20 %	Operating margin 13.9%
Size and capacity	15	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	95	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

6 contracts from 5 different buyers, 712.1 MNOK in total where the value is given. 0 of them had only one tender.

Contracts won in the last 5 years
Date	Buyer	Contract	Value
9 December 2024	STATSBYGG	Parallelle rammeavtaler om prosjektledelse for byggeprosjekter i Statsbygg	600.0 MNOK
13 June 2024	Gran Kommune	756 SLMS - Prosjektledelse for prosjekt med samspill	–
2 May 2024	Kirkelig fellesråd i Oslo	Anbudskonkurranse - Rammeavtaler for konsulenttjenester - BYGGELEDELSE	–
30 June 2022	Viken fylkeskommune	Rammeavtale; programmeringsarkitekt	30.0 MNOK
22 March 2022	Oslo kommune v/ Rådhusets forvaltningstjeneste	Prosjektleder for utvendig rehabilitering.	2.1 MNOK
17 March 2022	Viken fylkeskommune	Prosjektledere (PL) - Rammeavtale	80.0 MNOK

Source: Doffin (DFØ), NLOD 2.0. The latest ten contracts are shown.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.