Supplier assessment

Simsa AS

Org. no. 916358024 · Undervisning · TRONDHEIM

Grade B Solid basis

Points66 of 100, weighted

Public contracts0 last 5 years, 0 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · AI-generated

Simsa AS has grade B (66 out of 100), with very strong profitability and more modest scores for capacity and experience.

The grade is B on a scale from A (best) to E, with a score of 66 and rank no. 334 of 1,357 in the sector on the Morning index. Profitability scores 100 points, with an operating margin of 40.1% against an industry median of 3.0%, while solidity and liquidity score 65 each, capacity 50 and experience 40. The figures cannot show how the company would handle a larger or more complex delivery, and no public contracts are recorded for the last 5 years.

Strengths

The operating margin is 40.1%, well above the industry median of 3.0%, and the profit margin is 41.6%.
The current ratio is 1.36, and revenue grew by 3.0% in the 2025 accounts.
No hard warning signals are registered for the company.

Risks

The equity ratio is 27.4%, below the industry median of 31.4%.
Revenue is 4.0 MNOK, so the figures point to a small business whose capacity for large deliveries is not shown.
No public contracts were won in the last 5 years, so there is no track record with public buyers to review.
The company has opted out of audit, so the accounts have not been independently audited, and the number of employees is not available.

Questions to ask

Could the supplier provide references from earlier teaching or training deliveries of similar size?
Is it possible to ask for updated accounts or a recent management report to confirm the 2025 figures?
Would a parent company guarantee, bank guarantee or other security be relevant for the contract size?
Can the supplier document staffing and capacity to deliver the full scope, including cover during absence?

This text was written by artificial intelligence (AI) on 4 November 2026 from the figures on this page. Every number in it has been checked against the database. AI can still phrase things imprecisely: read it as a starting point, not a conclusion.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	65	30 %	Equity ratio 27.4%
Liquidity	65	20 %	Current ratio 1.36
Profitability	100	20 %	Operating margin 40.1%
Size and capacity	50	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	40	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

We find no contracts in Doffin in the last 5 years. The company may not have supplied the public sector, or its contracts were below the thresholds.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.