Supplier assessment

Webmed Epj AS

Org. no. 921572166 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon · OSLO · 63 employees

Grade D Weak, needs clarification

Points44 of 100, weighted

Public contracts11 last 5 years, 6 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · written from fixed rules

Webmed Epj AS gets grade D on the figures.

The figures show weaknesses that should be clarified before a contract, especially a large or long one.

Strengths

The company has won 11 public contracts from 6 different buyers in the last 5 years.

Risks

The current ratio is 0.95: current liabilities exceed current assets.
The operating margin is negative, −29.1%.
The largest contract is large compared with revenue.

Questions to ask

Ask how the company will fund its operations through the contract period.
Clarify capacity: staffing, subcontractors and other commitments.

This text is put together from fixed sentences. An AI-generated assessment follows once it has been written and checked.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	45	30 %	Equity ratio 12.2%
Liquidity	15	20 %	Current ratio 0.95
Profitability	15	20 %	Operating margin −29.1%
Size and capacity	40	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	100	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

11 contracts from 6 different buyers, 62.6 MNOK in total where the value is given. 0 of them had only one tender.

Contracts won in the last 5 years
Date	Buyer	Contract	Value
23 October 2026	Herøy kommune	Elektronisk pasientjournal (EPJ) til legekontor	–
4 March 2026	Voss kommune	Pasientjournalsystem til legevakt og kommunelegekontor	0.0 MNOK
11 February 2026	Norsk Helsenett SF	25/03809 Etablering av Pasientens planer - Norsk helsenett	6.0 MNOK
19 January 2026	Norsk Helsenett SF	Tildeling - Anskaffelse Integrasjon av EPJ-system til Pasientens Kritiske...	2.0 MNOK
15 January 2026	Norsk Helsenett SF	Tildeling av rammeavtale om EPJ-tjenester for helsetjenesten Kommunal...	30.1 MNOK
15 January 2026	Norsk Helsenett SF	25/00734 Rammeavtale for EPJ-løftet i Helsedirektoratet (Kontraktstildeling)	9.0 MNOK
14 January 2026	Skien kommune	EPJ Skien kommune	15.5 MNOK
14 January 2026	Skien kommune	EPJ Skien kommune	–
14 January 2026	Skien kommune	EPJ Skien kommune	–
31 January 2025	Øygarden kommune	Kontraktstildeling E-journal lege	–

Source: Doffin (DFØ), NLOD 2.0. The latest ten contracts are shown.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.