Supplier assessment

Ortopartner AS

Org. no. 922018863 · Handel · BERGEN · 8 employees

Grade C Middling, worth a closer look

Points58 of 100, weighted

Public contracts0 last 5 years, 0 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · AI-generated

Ortopartner AS has a mid-range grade of C (score 58 of 100), with strong profitability held back by thin solidity and liquidity.

The 2025 accounts show an operating margin of 10.6% against an industry median of 3.4%, and revenue of 44.6 MNOK after growth of 21.9%. The equity ratio of 19.8% is below the industry median of 36.3%, and the current ratio is 1.06. The figures cannot show how the company handles larger or longer deliveries, and there is no public contract history to draw on.

Strengths

Profitability scores 100 points, with an operating margin of 10.6% against an industry median of 3.4% and a profit margin of 11.8%.
Revenue grew by 21.9% to 44.6 MNOK in 2025.
No hard signals are registered and the company has not opted out of audit.

Risks

The equity ratio of 19.8% is below the industry median of 36.3%, and solidity scores 45 points.
The current ratio of 1.06 leaves little margin for short-term obligations, and liquidity scores 45 points.
Experience scores 40 points; the company was founded in 2018, has 8 employees and has won 0 public contracts in the last 5 years.
The company is not part of a group, so no parent company stands behind the accounts.

Questions to ask

Could the supplier provide updated accounts or a recent interim report to show how liquidity has developed since 2025?
Would a parent company guarantee, owner guarantee or bank guarantee be appropriate given the equity ratio of 19.8%?
Can the supplier give references from comparable deliveries, since there is no public contract history?
Can the supplier document capacity to deliver the contract volume with 8 employees?

This text was written by artificial intelligence (AI) on 5 November 2026 from the figures on this page. Every number in it has been checked against the database. AI can still phrase things imprecisely: read it as a starting point, not a conclusion.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	45	30 %	Equity ratio 19.8%
Liquidity	45	20 %	Current ratio 1.06
Profitability	100	20 %	Operating margin 10.6%
Size and capacity	70	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	40	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

We find no contracts in Doffin in the last 5 years. The company may not have supplied the public sector, or its contracts were below the thresholds.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.