Supplier assessment

Diro Design AS

Org. no. 926828630 · Handel · HÅ

Grade D Weak, needs clarification

Points46 of 100, weighted

Public contracts0 last 5 years, 0 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · AI-generated

Diro Design AS holds grade D (score 46 out of 100 on a scale from A to E), with strong profitability set against thin solidity and liquidity.

The 2025 accounts show an operating margin of 8.0% against an industry median of 2.6%, but an equity ratio of 18.0% against a median of 33.5% and a current ratio of 0.99. Revenue is 1.0 MNOK after growth of 263.0%, and the company was founded in 2021, so the track record is short. The figures cannot show how stable the earnings are or whether the company has delivered contracts of a similar size.

Strengths

Operating margin of 8.0% is above the industry median of 2.6%, and profit margin is 7.3%.
Profitability scores 80 points, the highest of the five areas.
No hard warning signals are registered.

Risks

Equity ratio of 18.0% is below the industry median of 33.5%.
Current ratio of 0.99 means current assets do not quite cover short-term obligations, and liquidity scores only 15 points.
Revenue of 1.0 MNOK is small, and growth of 263.0% from a low base says little about whether it will last.
The company has no public contracts won in the last 5 years, is not part of a group, and has opted out of audit, so there is no external reference point or group backing.

Questions to ask

Could the supplier provide a parent company guarantee, a bank guarantee or other security if the contract is large relative to 1.0 MNOK in revenue?
Can the supplier supply updated or interim accounts showing the current liquidity position?
Are there private-sector references for comparable deliveries that the buyer can contact?
How would the supplier document capacity to deliver, given that employee numbers are not reported?

This text was written by artificial intelligence (AI) on 4 November 2026 from the figures on this page. Every number in it has been checked against the database. AI can still phrase things imprecisely: read it as a starting point, not a conclusion.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	45	30 %	Equity ratio 18.0%
Liquidity	15	20 %	Current ratio 0.99
Profitability	80	20 %	Operating margin 8.0%
Size and capacity	50	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	40	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

We find no contracts in Doffin in the last 5 years. The company may not have supplied the public sector, or its contracts were below the thresholds.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.