Supplier assessment

Jupiter System Partner AS

Org. no. 947642081 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon · TROMSØ · 12 employees

Grade A Very solid basis

Points83 of 100, weighted

Public contracts5 last 5 years, 5 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · written from fixed rules

Jupiter System Partner AS gets grade A on the figures.

The accounts show good solidity and liquidity, and the figures give a buyer little cause for concern.

Strengths

The equity ratio is 33.9%, which gives a good buffer against losses.
The company has won 5 public contracts from 5 different buyers in the last 5 years.

Risks

Nothing to point out from the figures.

Questions to ask

Check that the figures still hold: ask for the latest interim figures if the contract is large.

This text is put together from fixed sentences. An AI-generated assessment follows once it has been written and checked.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	91	30 %	Equity ratio 33.9%
Liquidity	71	20 %	Current ratio 1.22
Profitability	78	20 %	Operating margin 4.1%
Size and capacity	70	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	95	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

5 contracts from 5 different buyers, 8.1 MNOK in total where the value is given. 0 of them had only one tender.

Contracts won in the last 5 years
Date	Buyer	Contract	Value
19 June 2025	Vestfold fylkeskommune	Digitalt møteverktøy for politiske møter	1.6 MNOK
30 September 2024	Bergen kommune - Innkjøp konsern	Kontraktstildeling - IK-EØS 021-2024 Politisk møteportal	–
15 March 2024	Indigo IKT IKS	Anskaffelse av Digital møteportal - fagsystem for møte- og utvalgsbehandling	–
15 June 2023	Vestland fylkeskommune	Digital møte- og utvalsportal - Den digitale politikarportalen	4.5 MNOK
15 March 2023	Lillestrøm Kommune	Anskaffelse av digitalt møtesystem for folkevalgte	2.0 MNOK

Source: Doffin (DFØ), NLOD 2.0. The latest ten contracts are shown.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets points from 0 to 100, and the points are weighted. Between the thresholds the points run smoothly, so a company with 38 % equity gets nearly the same as one with 40 %, not a whole step less. A missing area is left out and its weight shared among the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 0 % gives 25 points, 10 % gives 45, 20 % gives 65, 30 % gives 85 and 40 % or more gives 100, smoothly in between. Negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 0.5 gives 10 points, 0.8 gives 40, 1.0 gives 55, 1.2 gives 70, 1.5 gives 85 and 2.0 or more gives 100, smoothly in between.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating and profit margin. 0 % gives 55 points, 5 % gives 80 and 10 % or more gives 100, smoothly in between. A negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest Doffin contract against revenue. Under 10 % gives 100 points, under 30 % gives 70, under 60 % gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts revenue counts: 1 MNOK gives 50, 10 MNOK gives 70, 50 MNOK gives 85 and 1,000 MNOK or more gives 100, smoothly in between.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more gives 100 points, 3 gives 85 and 1 gives 65. Contracts from at least three different buyers give 10 points extra. No contracts do not count: many sound companies do not sell to the public sector, so the area is left out and its weight shared among the rest.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.