Supplier assessment

Devoteam AS

Org. no. 980172015 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon · OSLO · 73 employees

Grade C Middling, worth a closer look

Points63 of 100, weighted

Public contracts13 last 5 years, 6 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · written from fixed rules

Devoteam AS gets grade C on the figures.

The figures are mixed. Some areas are good, others should be clarified before a larger contract.

Strengths

The equity ratio is 33.8%, which gives a good buffer against losses.
The company has won 13 public contracts from 6 different buyers in the last 5 years.

Risks

The largest contract is large compared with revenue.

Questions to ask

Clarify capacity: staffing, subcontractors and other commitments.

This text is put together from fixed sentences. An AI-generated assessment follows once it has been written and checked.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	85	30 %	Equity ratio 33.8%
Liquidity	45	20 %	Current ratio 1.02
Profitability	35	20 %	Operating margin 3.0%
Size and capacity	15	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	100	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

13 contracts from 6 different buyers, 477.8 MNOK in total where the value is given. 0 of them had only one tender.

Contracts won in the last 5 years
Date	Buyer	Contract	Value
15 September 2026	Integrerings- og mangfoldsdirektoratet (IMDi)	Løsningsarkitekt	10.0 MNOK
18 June 2025	Digitaliseringsdirektoratet	Kontraktstildeling - Dokumentasjonsressurs til Nye Altinn – DPS	4.9 MNOK
7 May 2024	Registerenheten i Brønnøysund	Dynamisk innkjøpsordning - Arkitektur	–
11 March 2024	Registerenheten i Brønnøysund	Dynamisk innkjøpsordning - Prosjektledelse og -støtte	–
30 March 2023	Vigo IKS	Avtale - skyversjon av ServiceNow som en PaaS løsning	20.0 MNOK
30 November 2022	Oslo kommune v/ Utviklings- og kompetanseetaten	Samkjøpsavtale IKT konsulenttjenester	390.0 MNOK
30 November 2022	Oslo kommune v/ Utviklings- og kompetanseetaten	Samkjøpsavtale IKT konsulenttjenester	–
30 November 2022	Oslo kommune v/ Utviklings- og kompetanseetaten	Samkjøpsavtale IKT konsulenttjenester	–
30 November 2022	Oslo kommune v/ Utviklings- og kompetanseetaten	Samkjøpsavtale IKT konsulenttjenester	–
30 November 2022	Oslo kommune v/ Utviklings- og kompetanseetaten	Samkjøpsavtale IKT konsulenttjenester	–

Source: Doffin (DFØ), NLOD 2.0. The latest ten contracts are shown.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.