Supplier assessment

Espira Gjemble AS

Org. no. 983089909 · Undervisning · KARMØY · 41 employees

Grade C Middling, worth a closer look

Points64 of 100, weighted

Public contracts0 last 5 years, 0 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · AI-generated

Espira Gjemble AS has grade C (score 64 of 100), with very strong solidity but weak liquidity and no public contract history.

The grade C on a scale from A (best) to E reflects an equity ratio of 75.4% and an operating margin of 9.4%, offset by a current ratio of 0.22. The company was founded in 2001, has 41 employees and revenue of 20.7 MNOK in the 2025 accounts, ranking no. 485 of 1,357 in the sector on the Morning index. The figures do not show why liquidity is low or how the company handles public contracts.

Strengths

Solidity scores 100 points, with an equity ratio of 75.4% against an industry median of 20.2%.
The operating margin of 9.4% is above the industry median of 3.3%, and the profit margin is 8.6%.
Profitability scores 80 points and capacity 70 points, and no hard signals are registered.
The company is independent, has not opted out of audit, and has operated since 2001.

Risks

Liquidity scores only 15 points, and a current ratio of 0.22 shows short-term debt well above current assets.
Revenue growth is −4.4%, so revenue was lower than the year before.
The company has won 0 public contracts in the last 5 years, so there is no public track record to review.
Experience scores 40 points, the lowest area apart from liquidity.

Questions to ask

Can the supplier provide updated interim accounts or a liquidity budget showing how short-term obligations are covered?
Would a bank guarantee or similar security be appropriate given the current ratio of 0.22?
Can the supplier give references from comparable private or public assignments in the education field?
Can the supplier document capacity to deliver, such as staffing and qualifications among its 41 employees, for the contract in question?

This text was written by artificial intelligence (AI) on 5 November 2026 from the figures on this page. Every number in it has been checked against the database. AI can still phrase things imprecisely: read it as a starting point, not a conclusion.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	100	30 %	Equity ratio 75.4%
Liquidity	15	20 %	Current ratio 0.22
Profitability	80	20 %	Operating margin 9.4%
Size and capacity	70	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	40	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

We find no contracts in Doffin in the last 5 years. The company may not have supplied the public sector, or its contracts were below the thresholds.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.