Supplier assessment

Avskjerming AS

Org. no. 988042463 · Handel · TROMSØ · 13 employees

Grade

Grade A Very solid basis
Points90 of 100, weighted
Public contracts1 last 5 years, 1 different buyers
Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · AI-generated

Avskjerming AS holds grade A with a score of 90 out of 100, driven by top points for solidity, liquidity and profitability.

The 2025 accounts show an equity ratio of 82.7% against an industry median of 36.3%, a current ratio of 5.72 and an operating margin of 10.3% against a median of 3.4%. Capacity (70 points) and experience (65 points) score lower, with revenue of 20.8 MNOK, 13 employees and one public contract won in 5 years. The figures describe the accounts and public contract record, not the company's ability to deliver a specific assignment.

Strengths

  • Solidity, liquidity and profitability each received 100 points, with an equity ratio of 82.7% compared with an industry median of 36.3%.
  • The current ratio of 5.72 indicates that current assets are well above short-term obligations.
  • The operating margin of 10.3% and profit margin of 12.2% are positive, and the operating margin is above the industry median of 3.4%.
  • Revenue grew by 6.7%, the company was founded in 2005, and no hard signals are registered.

Risks

  • Capacity scored 70 points, and with 13 employees and revenue of 20.8 MNOK the company may have limited room for large or parallel assignments.
  • Experience scored 65 points, based on one public contract won in 5 years from one buyer (STATSBYGG) with a total value of 6.0 MNOK.
  • The company is not part of a group, so no parent company support is visible in the figures.
  • The figures cover the 2025 accounts only and do not show developments after that year.

Questions to ask

  • Could the supplier provide references from similar assignments, including private-sector ones, to supplement the single public contract record?
  • Is it relevant to ask how the supplier would staff and resource the assignment given its 13 employees, including any subcontractors?
  • Would updated interim figures or a bank guarantee be useful for a larger or longer contract?
  • Can the supplier describe its experience from the framework agreement with STATSBYGG and how it applies to this procurement?

This text was written by artificial intelligence (AI) on 4 November 2026 from the figures on this page. Every number in it has been checked against the database. AI can still phrase things imprecisely: read it as a starting point, not a conclusion.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
AreaPoints (0–100)WeightBasis
Solidity 100 30 % Equity ratio 82.7%
Liquidity 100 20 % Current ratio 5.72
Profitability 100 20 % Operating margin 10.3%
Size and capacity 70 10 % Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts 65 20 % Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

1 contracts from 1 different buyers, 6.0 MNOK in total where the value is given. 0 of them had only one tender.

Contracts won in the last 5 years
DateBuyerContractValue
5 June 2026STATSBYGG 2026/29 Rammeavtale om levering, service og vedlikehold av solskjerming ved... 6.0 MNOK

Source: Doffin (DFØ), NLOD 2.0. The latest ten contracts are shown.