Climatepoint AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
8of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 1 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 3,224 of 3,270 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 5,477 of 5,554 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 10 and resilience 8 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Climatepoint AS is 43 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 3,269 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −73.1% (median 5.5%) and equity ratio −10.0% (median 41.9%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −73.1% | 5.5% |
| Profit margin | −84.7% | 5.2% |
| Return on assets | −16.7% | 10.8% |
| Equity ratio | −10.0% | 41.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.09 |
| Current ratio | 1.25 | 1.68 |
| Revenue growth | −41.9% | 6.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 8, Climatepoint AS does better than 1% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (3,270 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Climatepoint AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Climatepoint AS has a score of 8 for 2025, rank 5,477 of 5,554 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 33 against peers, current ratio 1.25 against a median of 1.68.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −10.0% against a median of 41.9%. Growth: percentile 6 against peers, revenue growth −41.9% against a median of 6.0%.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −10.0% (median 41.9%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −84.7% (median 5.2%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −73.1% (median 5.5%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Climatepoint AS fell by 36.4 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 0.3 points. So the company did 36.1 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Climatepoint AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 0% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −36.7% | 5.7% | −144.5 percentage points | −0.2 percentage points | −144.3 percentage points |
| 2025 | −73.1% | 5.5% | −36.4 percentage points | −0.3 percentage points | −36.1 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Climatepoint AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities rose 8.1% in 2025; the operating margin of Climatepoint AS fell 36.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities, annual average | 99.0 | 108.8 | 127.9 | 146.4 | 158.3 | 155.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +9.8% | +9.9% | +17.5% | +14.5% | +8.1% | −1.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 107.8% | −36.7% | −73.1% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: advertising and market research (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: advertising and market research rose 3.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Climatepoint AS fell 36.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: advertising and market research, annual average | 99.4 | 113.5 | 108.3 | 106.9 | 110.7 | 126.1 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +35.1% | +14.2% | −4.6% | −1.3% | +3.6% | +13.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 107.8% | −36.7% | −73.1% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities rose 6.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Climatepoint AS fell 36.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: other professional and technical activities, annual average | 98.3 | 121.6 | 139.4 | 131.0 | 139.1 | 158.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +29.9% | +23.7% | +14.6% | −6.0% | +6.2% | +13.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 107.8% | −36.7% | −73.1% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: architects and engineering (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: architects and engineering rose 3.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Climatepoint AS fell 36.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: architects and engineering, annual average | 100.0 | 103.6 | 107.5 | 111.2 | 114.7 | 119.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.2% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +4.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 107.8% | −36.7% | −73.1% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Oil price (export price of crude oil) (kr per fat)
Oil price (export price of crude oil) fell 17.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Climatepoint AS fell 36.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil price (export price of crude oil), annual average | 609 | 979 | 877 | 859 | 708 | 881 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +61.1% | +60.8% | −10.5% | −2.0% | −17.6% | +24.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 107.8% | −36.7% | −73.1% | – |
Source: SSB (08799, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Climatepoint AS fell 36.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 107.8% | −36.7% | −73.1% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Climatepoint AS fell 36.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 107.8% | −36.7% | −73.1% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: architects and engineering (indeks)
Wage index: architects and engineering rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Climatepoint AS fell 36.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: architects and engineering, annual average | 90.5 | 90.9 | 96.0 | 100.9 | 105.6 | 109.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +7.4% | +0.5% | +5.6% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 107.8% | −36.7% | −73.1% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Climatepoint AS had an operating margin of −73.1% and an equity ratio of −10.0% in 2025, and ranks 5,477 of 5,554 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from −36.7% to −73.1% and revenue fell by 42%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 2 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 14.3 | 2 MNOK |
| P/B | 2.3 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 3 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 2 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 0 MNOK |
| Equity value | 2 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (71.1): Engineering/Construction.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −10.0% (median 41.9%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −84.7% (median 5.2%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −73.1% (median 5.5%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 2.6% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 10 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 33 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 6 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 11 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 29 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Climatepoint AS?
The operating margin was −73.1% in 2025, against a median of 5.5% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −16.7%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Climatepoint AS?
The equity ratio was −10.0% in 2025 (median 41.9%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of Climatepoint AS like?
The current ratio was 1.25 in 2025 (median 1.68).
How does Climatepoint AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
Climatepoint AS ranks 5,477 of 5,554 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 3,224 of 3,270. Revenue changed by −41.9% from the year before.
Group structure · 2025
2 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Climatepoint AS.
Climatepoint AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (1 company) 1 of 2 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Negative equity
- 1 company: Climatepoint AS
- Loss
- 1 company: Climatepoint AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company left: Climatepoint Methodology AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Climatepoint AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 823860862
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (71.129)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 12 November 2019 6 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.18 MNOK
- Business address
- Universitetsgata 12, 0164 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 9 January 2024
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 51
- Largest owner
- 25.7% · top three 50.5%
- Split
- companies 85% · private persons 15% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 41%
- Owners over 60
- 1% of the shares held by persons (median age 46)
- Varsity AS · 25.7%
- Aktia Ventures 2019 AS · 15.1%
- Klima 2020 AS · 9.6%
- Derwentwater Invest AS · 5.3%
- Bno Story AS · 5.3%
- Right Aim AS · 5.3%
- Scherzo AS · 4.2%
- Sorgenfri 1969 AS · 2.8%
- Staal Holding AS · 2.4%
- Gammen og Gagn AS · 1.9%
- 25 private persons · 15.1%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Majority owner of: Green River Investment Management AS (100%)
Holds shares in: Green River Investment Management AS (100%), Climatepoint Methodology AS (29%), Climatepoint AS (1%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 30 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 58 | 21 | 8 | |
| Rank | 2,016 | 5,020 | 5,477 | |
| Operating margin | 107.8% | −36.7% | −73.1% | |
| Return on assets | 25.3% | −10.0% | −16.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 24.0% | 10.9% | −10.0% | |
| Current ratio | 1.51 | 1.53 | 1.25 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 14.6% | −41.9% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.4 MNOK | 3.9 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 3.7 MNOK | −1.4 MNOK | −1.7 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 3.4 MNOK | −2.0 MNOK | −1.9 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 3.4 MNOK | −2.0 MNOK | −1.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.3 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Total assets | 14.8 MNOK | 14.3 MNOK | 9.9 MNOK |
| Current assets | 8.1 MNOK | 7.5 MNOK | 5.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 3.6 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | −1.0 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −2.0 MNOK | −4.0 MNOK | −6.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 11.3 MNOK | 12.7 MNOK | 10.9 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 5.3 MNOK | 4.9 MNOK | 4.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 30 October 2026, accounts id 6903802.
Further
Similar companies
- Ariabod AS index 9, rank 5,471 · compare
- Perfecto Digital AS index 9, rank 5,473 · compare
- Petricore Norway AS index 8, rank 5,474 · compare
- Tuyo Design Studio AS index 8, rank 5,475 · compare
- Eika Landskap AS index 8, rank 5,479 · compare