PWR UP AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
24of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 7 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 827 of 877 · Kraft og energi
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 8 and solidity 17 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
PWR UP AS is 27 points below the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 687 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −88.7% (median 15.1%) and equity ratio 11.7% (median 38.8%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3 MNOK | 5 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −88.7% | 15.1% |
| Profit margin | −144.3% | 8.4% |
| Return on assets | −6.9% | 4.7% |
| Equity ratio | 11.7% | 38.8% |
| Debt-to-equity | 7.52 | 1.38 |
| Current ratio | 0.51 | 1.64 |
| Revenue growth | 74.4% | 3.6% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 24, PWR UP AS does better than 7% of small companies in the same sector (687 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- PWR UP AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
PWR UP AS has a score of 24 for 2025, rank 827 of 877 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 92 against peers, revenue growth 74.4% against a median of 3.6%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 8 against peers, operating margin −88.7% against a median of 15.1%. Consistency: percentile 10 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.0 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.51 (median 1.64).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −144.3% (median 8.4%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −88.7% (median 15.1%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
PWR UP AS had an operating margin of −88.7% and an equity ratio of 11.7% in 2025, and ranks 827 of 877 in Kraft og energi.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −160.3% to −88.7% and revenue grew by 74%.
PWR UP AS did weaker than the sector in 2025, the sector's weakest year.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 4 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 4 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.0 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.51 (median 1.64).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −144.3% (median 8.4%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −88.7% (median 15.1%).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 74.4% (median 3.6%); Current ratio 0.51 (median 1.64).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 4.9% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
The operating margin was −88.7% in 2025 (sector median 15.8%), and the equity ratio 11.7%. The company had a loss before tax that year. In the other years the operating margin averaged −198.0%.
The sector's weakest year was 2025, with a median operating margin of 15.8%. Based on the 5 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 8 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 17 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 12 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 92 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 10 | weight 15% |
Durability: 30 (average over 2 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is PWR UP AS?
The operating margin was −88.7% in 2025, against a median of 15.1% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −6.9%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is PWR UP AS?
The equity ratio was 11.7% in 2025 (median 38.8%). Debt-to-equity was 7.52 (median 1.38).
What is the liquidity of PWR UP AS like?
The current ratio was 0.51 in 2025 (median 1.64). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does PWR UP AS compare in Kraft og energi?
PWR UP AS ranks 827 of 877 in Kraft og energi for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 641 of 687. Revenue changed by 74.4% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 828034502
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Kraft og energi (35.150)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 6 October 2021 5 years in operation
- Share capital
- 1.08 MNOK
- Business address
- Jernbaneveien 85, 8006 BODØ
- Municipality
- Bodø rank 4–9 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Øystein Gudbrandsen Wik
- Chair of the board
- Monica Hansen Fjellstad
- Board member
- Lars Arve Jakobsen
- Board member
- Berit Helen Wilhelmsen
- Board member
- Mariann Meby
- Deputy member
- Ole Angellsen
- Auditor
- CEDRA NORGE AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | 36 | 24 | |
| Rank | – | 673 | 827 | |
| Operating margin | −235.7% | −160.3% | −88.7% | |
| Return on assets | −3.3% | −6.4% | −6.9% | |
| Equity ratio | 25.2% | 21.8% | 11.7% | |
| Current ratio | 2.08 | 3.17 | 0.51 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 123.3% | 74.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.6 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −1.5 MNOK | −2.3 MNOK | −2.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −2.2 MNOK | −3.6 MNOK | −3.6 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.7 MNOK | −2.8 MNOK | −3.6 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.8 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 40.6 MNOK | 34.1 MNOK | 32.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 9.1 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 10.2 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK | 3.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | – | – | – |
| Total liabilities | 30.4 MNOK | 26.7 MNOK | 28.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 4.4 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 6606719.
Further
Similar companies
- AMUNDAL ENERGI AS index 24, rank 823 · compare
- VIMLE AS index 24, rank 824 · compare
- BOTNEN KRAFTVERK AS index 24, rank 825 · compare
- RODAL KRAFT AS index 24, rank 826 · compare
- CHARGE365 AS index 24, rank 828 · compare