TT Skogsdrift AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
43of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 38 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 134 of 216 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 218 of 350 · Jordbruk og skogbruk
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 54 and solidity 19 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
TT Skogsdrift AS is 7 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 216 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 11.1% (median 5.1%) and equity ratio 14.9% (median 46.1%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 8 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 11.1% | 5.1% |
| Profit margin | 2.9% | 5.1% |
| Return on assets | 6.4% | 8.2% |
| Equity ratio | 14.9% | 46.1% |
| Debt-to-equity | 5.73 | 0.75 |
| Current ratio | 0.37 | 1.75 |
| Revenue growth | 51.0% | 6.7% |
| Revenue per employee | 1.57 MNOK | 0.49 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 43, TT Skogsdrift AS does better than 38% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (216 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- TT Skogsdrift AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
TT Skogsdrift AS has a score of 43 for 2025, rank 218 of 350 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 85 against peers, revenue growth 51.0% against a median of 6.7%.
Weakest: Liquidity: percentile 8 against peers, current ratio 0.37 against a median of 1.75. Solidity: percentile 19 against peers, equity ratio 14.9% against a median of 46.1%.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.7 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.37 (median 1.75).
- Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have? Based on: revenue growth 51.0% (median 6.7%); current ratio 0.37 (median 1.75).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
TT Skogsdrift AS had an operating margin of 11.1% and an equity ratio of 14.9% in 2025, and ranks 218 of 350 in Jordbruk og skogbruk.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 51% and the operating margin fell from 20.9% to 11.1%.
TT Skogsdrift AS did better than the sector in 2025, the sector's weakest year.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 2 MNOK and 7 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 2 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | 7 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.0 | 2 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.7 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.37 (median 1.75).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 51.0% (median 6.7%); Current ratio 0.37 (median 1.75).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 5.5% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
The operating margin was 11.1% in 2025 (sector median 6.2%), and the equity ratio 14.9%. In the other years the operating margin averaged 20.5%.
The sector's weakest year was 2025, with a median operating margin of 6.2%. Based on the 7 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 54 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 19 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 8 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 85 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 56 | weight 15% |
Durability: 44 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is TT Skogsdrift AS?
The operating margin was 11.1% in 2025, against a median of 5.1% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 6.4%.
How solid is TT Skogsdrift AS?
The equity ratio was 14.9% in 2025 (median 46.1%). Debt-to-equity was 5.73 (median 0.75).
What is the liquidity of TT Skogsdrift AS like?
The current ratio was 0.37 in 2025 (median 1.75). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does TT Skogsdrift AS compare in Jordbruk og skogbruk?
TT Skogsdrift AS ranks 218 of 350 in Jordbruk og skogbruk for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 134 of 216. Revenue changed by 51.0% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 828902342
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Jordbruk og skogbruk (02.400)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 5 registered 10 September 2025
- Founded
- 24 February 2022 4 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.12 MNOK
- Business address
- Kaptein Dreyers veg 976, 2280 GJESÅSEN (ÅSNES)
- Municipality
- Åsnes rank 40 of 40 in KOSTRA group 1
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 30 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 38 | 51 | 43 | |
| Rank | 213 | 160 | 218 | |
| Operating margin | 20.1% | 20.9% | 11.1% | |
| Return on assets | 15.1% | 16.9% | 6.4% | |
| Equity ratio | 19.5% | 28.7% | 14.9% | |
| Current ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 0.37 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 16.4% | 51.0% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 4.5 MNOK | 5.2 MNOK | 7.8 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.9 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.6 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.5 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Total assets | 6.0 MNOK | 6.4 MNOK | 13.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.0 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Equity | 1.2 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.6 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 4.8 MNOK | 4.6 MNOK | 11.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.3 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 30 October 2026, accounts id 7038786.
Further
Similar companies
- Botne Entreprenør AS index 45, rank 215 · compare
- Gartneritomten AS index 44, rank 217 · compare
- G.T.H Anlegg AS index 43, rank 221 · compare
- Hundebarnehagen AS index 43, rank 222 · compare
- Kristiansund Skog og Trepleie AS index 42, rank 225 · compare