Finnsnes Senter AS
Accounts for 2025 are missing. The deadline was 31 July 2026. The Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish when accounts arrived, only the latest year filed.
Score · fiscal year 2023
32of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 26 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 736 of 1,001 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,488 of 1,966 · Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2023, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 54 and solidity 13 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. Methodology
Against the sector
Finnsnes Senter AS is 17 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023.
Median score 49 among 1,000 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023: operating margin 15.5% (median 3.9%) and equity ratio 2.4% (median 29.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 6 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 15.5% | 3.9% |
| Profit margin | −68.4% | 3.1% |
| Return on assets | 1.2% | 8.1% |
| Equity ratio | 2.4% | 29.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 41.00 | 1.39 |
| Current ratio | 0.04 | 1.31 |
| Revenue growth | 12.0% | 5.8% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 32, Finnsnes Senter AS does better than 26% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (1,001 companies) in 2023.
Score 2022–2024
- Finnsnes Senter AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
What the numbers say
Finnsnes Senter AS had an operating margin of 15.5% and an equity ratio of 2.4% in 2023, and ranks 1,488 of 1,966 in Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting.
From 2022 to 2023: the operating margin rose from 6.7% to 15.5% and revenue grew by 12%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2023 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 2 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | debt above value |
| P/B | 1.0 | 2 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 24.8 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.04 (median 1.31).
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 2.4% (median 29.5%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −68.4% (median 3.1%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 6.6% of the debt in 2023. The policy rate averaged 3.54 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of −3.2%. Based on the 9 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 54 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 13 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 1 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 55 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 30 | weight 15% |
Durability: 30 (average over 2 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Finnsnes Senter AS?
The operating margin was 15.5% in 2023, against a median of 3.9% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 1.2%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Finnsnes Senter AS?
The equity ratio was 2.4% in 2023 (median 29.5%). Debt-to-equity was 41.00 (median 1.39).
What is the liquidity of Finnsnes Senter AS like?
The current ratio was 0.04 in 2023 (median 1.31). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Finnsnes Senter AS compare in Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting?
Finnsnes Senter AS ranks 1,488 of 1,966 in Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting for 2023. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 736 of 1,001. Revenue changed by 12.0% from the year before.
Group accounts
The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
We do not show the group structure, because open data does not say who owns whom.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 892568332
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting (81.100)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 30 January 2008 18 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.30 MNOK
- Business address
- Teknologiveien 11, 8517 NARVIK
- Municipality
- Narvik rank 16–25 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Latest accounts filed
- 2024
- LEI
- 9845004554E4A6E3F423 renews 7 February 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 2 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No known owner
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 31 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 30 October 2026.
Year by year · 2022–2024
| Key figure | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 27 | 32 | 30 | |
| Rank | 31 | 1,488 | 1,685 | |
| Operating margin | 6.7% | 15.5% | 30.9% | |
| Return on assets | 0.5% | 1.2% | 2.5% | |
| Equity ratio | 7.5% | 2.4% | −1.5% | |
| Current ratio | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 12.0% | 8.9% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 5.0 MNOK | 5.6 MNOK | 6.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.3 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.5 MNOK | −3.8 MNOK | −2.9 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.5 MNOK | −3.8 MNOK | −2.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.8 MNOK | 4.7 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK |
| Total assets | 74.9 MNOK | 73.3 MNOK | 76.8 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.5 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 5.6 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | −1.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | – | – | −2.9 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 69.3 MNOK | 71.5 MNOK | 78.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 4.7 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK | 17.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 30 October 2026, accounts id 5271265.
Further
Similar companies
- Hankø Vakt og Hytteservice AS index 32, rank 1,483 · compare
- AI Accounting AS index 32, rank 1,484 · compare
- Bee2bee AS index 32, rank 1,486 · compare
- Lift og Maskinutleie AS index 32, rank 1,489 · compare
- P & P Facility Services AS index 32, rank 1,490 · compare