Session Drift AS
Score · fiscal year 2024
30of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 18 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 1,783 of 2,165 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 3,439 of 4,104 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 33 and solidity 22 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. Methodology
Against the sector
Session Drift AS is 20 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024.
Median score 50 among 2,165 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024: operating margin −0.8% (median 5.8%) and equity ratio 16.0% (median 41.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 9 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −0.8% | 5.8% |
| Profit margin | −57.5% | 5.6% |
| Return on assets | 5.1% | 11.5% |
| Equity ratio | 16.0% | 41.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 5.26 | 1.10 |
| Current ratio | 0.67 | 1.61 |
| Revenue growth | 30.8% | 5.6% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 30, Session Drift AS does better than 18% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (2,165 companies) in 2024.
Score 2023–2025
- Session Drift AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
What the numbers say
Session Drift AS had an operating margin of −0.8% and an equity ratio of 16.0% in 2024, and ranks 3,439 of 4,104 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
From 2023 to 2024: the equity ratio fell from 41.3% to 16.0% and revenue grew by 31%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 6 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.6 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 15.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.2 | 6 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered by 51% for an unlisted company: 20% for lack of marketability and 38% for size (a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity).
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.5 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.67 (median 1.61).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −57.5% (median 5.6%).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 30.8% (median 5.6%); Current ratio 0.67 (median 1.61).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 33.8% of the debt in 2024. The policy rate averaged 4.50 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 33 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 22 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 10 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 76 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 10 | weight 15% |
Durability: 30 (average over 2 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Session Drift AS?
The operating margin was −0.8% in 2024, against a median of 5.8% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 5.1%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Session Drift AS?
The equity ratio was 16.0% in 2024 (median 41.5%). Debt-to-equity was 5.26 (median 1.10).
What is the liquidity of Session Drift AS like?
The current ratio was 0.67 in 2024 (median 1.61). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Session Drift AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
Session Drift AS ranks 3,439 of 4,104 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2024. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 1,783 of 2,165. Revenue changed by 30.8% from the year before.
Group structure · 2025
12 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in BB Holding AS. Persons are not shown by name.
BB Holding AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Handel (9 companies), Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (1 company) 10 of 12 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 55 in all. Stavanger 55 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 2 companies: Session Drift AS, Session Strømmen AS
- Loss
- 9 companies: Session Stavanger AS, Session Arkaden AS, Session Drift AS, Session Bergen AS, Session Kvadrat AS, Session Sandvika AS …
- Changed 2024–2025
- 3 companies left.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 896262912
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (73.300)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 1 December 2010 15 years in operation
- Share capital
- 2.93 MNOK
- Business address
- Kirkegata 17, 4006 STAVANGER
- Municipality
- Stavanger rank 5 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 2 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 4 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 60.0% · top three 95.0%
- Split
- companies 90% · private persons 10% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 95%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: BB Holding AS (60%)
Ultimate owner: private person
- BB Holding AS · 60.0%
- Mwh Holding AS · 30.0%
- 2 private persons · 10.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Majority owner of: Session Bergen AS (100%), Session Sandvika AS (100%), Session Stavanger AS (100%), Session Strømmen AS (100%), Session Arkaden AS (100%), Session Kristiansand AS (100%), Session Lagunen AS (100%), Session Haugesund AS (98%)
The portfolio: 9 of the companies it owns shares in have accounts with us, 9 of them as majority owner. The average index is 31. 1 have negative equity and 8 made a loss in the latest year.
Holds shares in: Session Kristiansand AS (100%), Session Strømmen AS (100%), Session Arkaden AS (100%), Session Lagunen AS (100%), Session Bergen AS (100%), Session Sandvika AS (100%), Session Stavanger AS (100%), Session Haugesund AS (98%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 30 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 30 | 30 | 8 | |
| Rank | 3,172 | 3,439 | 4,117 | |
| Operating margin | −0.6% | −0.8% | −24.2% | |
| Return on assets | 4.3% | 5.1% | −13.5% | |
| Equity ratio | 41.3% | 16.0% | −38.7% | |
| Current ratio | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.34 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 30.8% | −27.8% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 7.2 MNOK | 9.5 MNOK | 6.8 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | −1.7 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −1.6 MNOK | −5.4 MNOK | −7.9 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.7 MNOK | −5.7 MNOK | −7.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 2.5 MNOK | 6.6 MNOK | 6.5 MNOK |
| Total assets | 22.9 MNOK | 23.4 MNOK | 10.8 MNOK |
| Current assets | 6.1 MNOK | 11.2 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK |
| Equity | 9.5 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK | −4.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −2.0 MNOK | −7.7 MNOK | −15.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 13.5 MNOK | 19.7 MNOK | 15.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 10.2 MNOK | 16.7 MNOK | 12.3 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 30 October 2026, accounts id 5951135.
Further
Similar companies
- Ørje Dyreklinikk AS index 30, rank 3,433 · compare
- Vassfall AS index 30, rank 3,437 · compare
- Hatlehols Grafiske AS index 30, rank 3,438 · compare
- Tramp AS index 30, rank 3,440 · compare
- Norwegian Energy Consultants AS index 30, rank 3,441 · compare