ENGROSNETT AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
32of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 24 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 30,120 of 38,670 · Handel
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 23 and solidity 15 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
ENGROSNETT AS is 18 points below the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 36,110 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −3.4% (median 2.5%) and equity ratio 4.8% (median 38.3%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 35 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −3.4% | 2.5% |
| Profit margin | −4.8% | 2.2% |
| Return on assets | −14.3% | 4.0% |
| Equity ratio | 4.8% | 38.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | 20.02 | 0.99 |
| Current ratio | 1.02 | 1.70 |
| Revenue growth | 23.0% | 3.5% |
| Revenue per employee | 3.50 MNOK | 1.62 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 32, ENGROSNETT AS does better than 24% of small companies in the same sector (36,579 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- ENGROSNETT AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
ENGROSNETT AS has a score of 32 for 2025, rank 30,120 of 38,670 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 77 against peers, revenue growth 23.0% against a median of 3.5%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 15 against peers, equity ratio 4.8% against a median of 38.3%. Profitability: percentile 23 against peers, operating margin −3.4% against a median of 2.5%.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 4.8% (median 38.3%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −4.8% (median 2.2%).
- Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have? Based on: revenue growth 23.0% (median 3.5%); current ratio 1.02 (median 1.70).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
ENGROSNETT AS had an operating margin of −3.4% and an equity ratio of 4.8% in 2025, and ranks 30,120 of 38,670 in Handel.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 23% and the operating margin rose from −7.0% to −3.4%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 0 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 0 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 4.8% (median 38.3%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −4.8% (median 2.2%).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 23.0% (median 3.5%); Current ratio 1.02 (median 1.70).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 6.8% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2017, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2017, with a median operating margin of −65.6%. Based on the 11 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 23 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 15 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 26 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 77 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 42 | weight 15% |
Durability: 27 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is ENGROSNETT AS?
The operating margin was −3.4% in 2025, against a median of 2.5% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −14.3%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is ENGROSNETT AS?
The equity ratio was 4.8% in 2025 (median 38.3%). Debt-to-equity was 20.02 (median 0.99).
What is the liquidity of ENGROSNETT AS like?
The current ratio was 1.02 in 2025 (median 1.70).
How does ENGROSNETT AS compare in Handel?
ENGROSNETT AS ranks 30,120 of 38,670 in Handel for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 27,929 of 36,579. Revenue changed by 23.0% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 911550717
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Handel (46.390)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 10 registered 10 July 2026
- Founded
- 1 January 2013 13 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Lønningshaugen 2, 5258 BLOMSTERDALEN (BERGEN)
- Municipality
- Bergen rank 8 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Truls Høllre
- Chair of the board
- Harald Sylta
- Board member
- Tor-Inge Måkestad
- Board member
- John-Olav Måkestad
- Board member
- Odd-Øyvind Måkestad
- Board member
- Geir-Ove Måkestad
- Board member
- Truls Høllre
- Auditor
- KPMG AS
- Accountant
- LEANLEDGER AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 22 | 27 | 32 | |
| Rank | 29,560 | 30,686 | 30,120 | |
| Operating margin | −1.8% | −7.0% | −3.4% | |
| Return on assets | −3.9% | −20.3% | −14.3% | |
| Equity ratio | 5.1% | 4.5% | 4.8% | |
| Current ratio | 1.05 | 1.02 | 1.02 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 11.6% | 23.0% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 25.5 MNOK | 28.4 MNOK | 35.0 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.5 MNOK | −2.0 MNOK | −1.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.6 MNOK | −2.2 MNOK | −1.7 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.5 MNOK | −1.7 MNOK | −1.3 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Total assets | 9.4 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK | 8.1 MNOK |
| Current assets | 9.4 MNOK | 8.8 MNOK | 7.9 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.5 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | – | – | – |
| Total liabilities | 8.9 MNOK | 8.6 MNOK | 7.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 8.9 MNOK | 8.6 MNOK | 7.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 7177283.
Further
Similar companies
- BAGBROKERS AS index 32, rank 30,117 · compare
- INDIE DISTRIBUTION AS index 32, rank 30,118 · compare
- BRIGHT SMILE AS index 32, rank 30,119 · compare
- OMFA INVEST AS index 32, rank 30,121 · compare
- MOLLYMOOD AS index 32, rank 30,123 · compare