Torque AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
52of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 53 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 1,056 of 2,242 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,588 of 3,401 · Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 98 and resilience 1 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Torque AS is 1 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 2,242 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 80.0% (median 9.0%) and equity ratio −199.3% (median 41.9%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 80.0% | 9.0% |
| Profit margin | 89.9% | 9.6% |
| Return on assets | 1,215.8% | 16.9% |
| Equity ratio | −199.3% | 41.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.22 |
| Current ratio | 0.33 | 1.62 |
| Revenue growth | 6,992.7% | 5.7% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 52, Torque AS does better than 53% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (2,242 companies) in 2025.
Score over time
Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.
Torque AS has a score of 52 for 2025, rank 1,588 of 3,401 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 98 against peers, operating margin 80.0% against a median of 9.0%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −199.3% against a median of 41.9%. Liquidity: percentile 3 against peers, current ratio 0.33 against a median of 1.62.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −199.3% (median 41.9%).
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 3.0 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.33 (median 1.62).
- Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have? Based on: revenue growth 6,992.7% (median 5.7%); current ratio 0.33 (median 1.62).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Torque AS fell by 120.6 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 0.4 points. So the company did 120.1 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Torque AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 0% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 200.5% | 9.5% | +214.0 percentage points | −0.3 percentage points | +214.3 percentage points |
| 2025 | 80.0% | 9.0% | −120.6 percentage points | −0.4 percentage points | −120.1 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Torque AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: legal and accounting activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: legal and accounting activities rose 4.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Torque AS fell 120.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: legal and accounting activities, annual average | 100.4 | 107.7 | 127.0 | 135.2 | 141.7 | 149.6 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +7.3% | +17.9% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +5.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −13.5% | 200.5% | 80.0% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: management consultancy (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: management consultancy rose 6.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Torque AS fell 120.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: management consultancy, annual average | 99.4 | 104.0 | 114.9 | 116.0 | 123.6 | 128.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +17.3% | +4.6% | +10.5% | +1.0% | +6.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −13.5% | 200.5% | 80.0% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: legal and accounting (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: legal and accounting rose 4.9% in 2025; the operating margin of Torque AS fell 120.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: legal and accounting, annual average | 100.0 | 104.8 | 111.8 | 117.4 | 123.2 | 127.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.4% | +4.8% | +6.7% | +5.0% | +4.9% | +3.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −13.5% | 200.5% | 80.0% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Torque AS fell 120.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 102.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −13.5% | 200.5% | 80.0% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Torque AS fell 120.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −13.5% | 200.5% | 80.0% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: legal and accounting (indeks)
Wage index: legal and accounting rose 5.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Torque AS fell 120.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: legal and accounting, annual average | 86.2 | 89.8 | 93.9 | 99.1 | 104.4 | 108.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.1% | +4.3% | +4.5% | +5.6% | +5.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −13.5% | 200.5% | 80.0% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Torque AS had an operating margin of 80.0% and an equity ratio of −199.3% in 2025, and ranks 1,588 of 3,401 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 6,993% and the operating margin fell from 200.5% to 80.0%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 4 MNOK and 4 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.4 | 4 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 17.4 | 4 MNOK |
| P/B | 4.1 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 6 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 4 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 0 MNOK |
| Equity value | 4 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Business & Consumer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −199.3% (median 41.9%).
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 3.0 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.33 (median 1.62).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 6,992.7% (median 5.7%); Current ratio 0.33 (median 1.62).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 109.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 5.4%. Based on the 7 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 98 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 3 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 50 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 4 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Torque AS?
The operating margin was 80.0% in 2025, against a median of 9.0% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 1,215.8%.
How solid is Torque AS?
The equity ratio was −199.3% in 2025 (median 41.9%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of Torque AS like?
The current ratio was 0.33 in 2025 (median 1.62). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Torque AS compare in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning?
Torque AS ranks 1,588 of 3,401 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 1,056 of 2,242. Revenue changed by 6,992.7% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toleko AS · same municipality |  Lion |
1 MNOK | 88.3% | 75 |
| Rein Tekst AS |  Beaver |
1 MNOK | −3.4% | 32 |
| Indat Consulting AS · same municipality | Beaver |
1 MNOK | 1.0% | 33 |
| The Gaia Gang AS |  Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 3.7% | 45 |
| Polinor Tjenester AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | 4.6% | 36 |
| Ekma AS · same municipality | Lion |
1 MNOK | 14.9% | 61 |
| Dalsnø AS |  Elephant |
1 MNOK | −20.3% | 51 |
| Torque AS (this company) | Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 80.0% | 52 |
| Jarle Opstad AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | 4.5% | 47 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 911710978
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (70.200)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 8 March 2013 13 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Åsdalsveien 4, 1166 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 20 March 2013
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- LEI
- 549300YJD4S1HMXQSI58 renews 22 May 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 2 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 30 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | – | 52 | |
| Rank | – | – | 1,588 | |
| Operating margin | −13.5% | 200.5% | 80.0% | |
| Return on assets | −0.1% | 0.8% | 1,215.8% | |
| Equity ratio | −23.1% | −29.3% | −199.3% | |
| Current ratio | 0.13 | 0.53 | 0.33 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 2.2% | 6,992.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 4.8 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Equity | −1.1 MNOK | −1.4 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −1.1 MNOK | −1.4 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 5.9 MNOK | 6.2 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 30 October 2026, accounts id 6679214.
Further
Similar companies
- Procedo AS index 52, rank 1,583 · compare
- Oslo Finans Forvaltning AS index 52, rank 1,584 · compare
- Morgenfugl AS index 52, rank 1,585 · compare
- Iregnskap Kristiansand AS index 52, rank 1,589 · compare
- Prodo AS index 52, rank 1,591 · compare