Lied AS

Org. no. 911903067 · Ålesund · AS

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

Key facts

Employees – Not registered in the Central Coordinating Register
Operating revenue · 2025 0.9 MNOK Micro
Net profit · 2025 −0.3 MNOK
Equity · 2025 1.9 MNOK
Founded 1976 50 years in operation
Sector Eiendom 68.200
Quick check · fiscal year 2025

Is the company run well?

Five key figures against companies in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.

  • Profitability · operating margin −33.9% Weaker than the industry Industry: 47.7%
  • Returns · return on assets −15.2% Weaker than the industry Industry: 7.8%
  • Solidity · equity ratio 92.4% Better than the industry Industry: 27.9%
  • Liquidity · current ratio 0.51 Weaker than the industry Industry: 1.40
  • Growth · revenue growth 5.8% Better than the industry Industry: 3.3%

The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology

Score · fiscal year 2025

Not enough data: Not enough data (below minimum revenue)

Based on the annual accounts for 2025

Source: Register of Company Accounts and Central Coordinating RegisterFetched 30 October 2026Report an issue
Development

How it has gone · 2023–2025

Revenue fell by 31 % from 2023 to 2025, to 0.9 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 11.4% in 2023 to −33.9% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 83.4% in 2023 to 92.4% in 2025.

Score · 2023 54
Operating revenue · 2025 0.9 MNOK −31% since 2023 (weaker)
Net profit · 2025 −0.3 MNOK −307% since 2023 (weaker)
Operating margin · 2025 −33.9% −45.3 pp since 2023 (weaker)
Equity ratio · 2025 92.4% +9.0 pp since 2023 (better)
Current ratio · 2025 0.51 +0.13 since 2023 (better)

Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year

Accounts in short

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue1.4 MNOK0.9 MNOK0.9 MNOK
Operating profit0.2 MNOK0.2 MNOK−0.3 MNOK
Net profit0.2 MNOK0.2 MNOK−0.3 MNOK
Total assets2.6 MNOK2.4 MNOK2.1 MNOK
Equity2.2 MNOK2.2 MNOK1.9 MNOK
Total liabilities0.4 MNOK0.2 MNOK0.2 MNOK

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year

From the Central Coordinating Register

Org. no.
911903067
Legal form
AS · part of a group
Sector
Eiendom (68.200)
Purpose
Produksjon og salg samt hva dermed står i for- bindelse, deltakelse i andre foretak ved aksje- tegning eller på annen måte, samt avgivelse av garantier.
Morning company class
Micro
Employees
0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 0.8 MNOK (2025).
Founded
15 June 1976 50 years in operation
Share capital
0.36 MNOK
Business address
Elling O. Wallbøes veg 11, 6240 ØRSKOG (ÅLESUND)
Municipality
Ålesund rank 2–6 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
Audit
Audit opted out from 29 December 2020
Latest accounts filed
2025
VAT registered
Yes
The company's business municipality, Ålesund. The map shows the municipality, not the address. Map source: Kartverket (CC BY 4.0).

Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre

Indications · 2025

Worth a closer look

  • watch

    Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.9 times current assets.

    Based on: Current ratio 0.51 (median 1.40).

  • watch

    The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?

    Based on: Profit margin −33.9% (median 24.4%).

  • watch

    The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?

    Based on: Operating margin −33.9% (median 47.7%).

  • watch

    Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?

    Based on: Net working capital to revenue −14.3% (median −12.4%); Current ratio 0.51 (median 1.40).

Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.

Financial costs were 0.1% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.

See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector

Data quality

No anomalies found in the figures.

Stress test · 2022

Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year

We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.

The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology

Key figures · 2025

The numbers behind the score

The numbers behind the score · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianAhead of
Operating revenue1 MNOK2 MNOK
Operating margin −33.9% 47.7% not compared
Profit margin −33.9% 24.4% shown, not part of the index
Return on assets −15.2% 7.8% not compared
Equity ratio 92.4% 27.9% not compared
Debt-to-equity 0.08 2.10 not compared
Current ratio 0.51 1.40 not compared
Revenue growth 5.8% 3.3% not compared

The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.

Over time

Score over time

Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.

Working capital and debt · 2025

Working capital and debt

Working capital and debt · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianHigher than
Working capital
Receivable days
All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue.
10 days 40 days not compared
Inventory and other current assets, days
Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue.
0 days 0 days not compared
Net working capital to revenue
Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations.
−14.3% −12.4% not compared
Cash share of current assets
How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash.
69.1% 54.9% not compared
Debt and interest burden
Interest coverage (times)
Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt.
−1,438.9 1.8 not compared
Financial costs as a share of debt
All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate.
0.1% 5.0% not compared
Long-term share of debt
Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year.
– 87.8% not compared

The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.

Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.1 MNOK.

Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.

The median and the bar refer to companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.

The industry or the company: what drove the result?

In 2025 the operating margin of Lied AS fell by 53.1 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 53.8 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.

Over 2 year-to-year changes Lied AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 3% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.

The operating margin of Lied AS against comparable companies, year by year
YearThe companyComparable (median) Change, companyChange, industryThe company's own
202419.2%46.9% +7.8 percentage points +0.9 percentage points +6.9 percentage points
2025−33.9%47.7% −53.1 percentage points +0.7 percentage points −53.8 percentage points

Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.

The company and its sector's drivers

Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Lied AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.

House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))

House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Lied AS fell 53.1 percentage points.

House prices (existing homes) per year and the operating margin of Lied AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
House prices (existing homes), annual average134.5141.6140.8144.6152.5158.7 (so far)
Change from the year before+10.5%+5.2%−0.5%+2.7%+5.5%+4.1%
The company's operating margin––11.4%19.2%−33.9%–

Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source

Policy rate (prosent)

Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Lied AS fell 53.1 percentage points.

Policy rate per year and the operating margin of Lied AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Policy rate, annual average0.081.323.544.504.304.17 (so far)
Change from the year before−0.28 percentage points+1.24 percentage points+2.22 percentage points+0.96 percentage points−0.20 percentage points−0.12 percentage points
The company's operating margin––11.4%19.2%−33.9%–

Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source

Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))

Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Lied AS fell 53.1 percentage points.

Construction cost index for dwellings per year and the operating margin of Lied AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average124.2135.1141.1146.4152.7158.7 (so far)
Change from the year before+8.7%+8.8%+4.4%+3.7%+4.3%+3.9%
The company's operating margin––11.4%19.2%−33.9%–

Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source

Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))

Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Lied AS fell 53.1 percentage points.

Consumer price index per year and the operating margin of Lied AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Consumer price index, annual average84.389.294.197.0100.0103.0 (so far)
Change from the year before+3.5%+5.8%+5.5%+3.2%+3.0%+3.0%
The company's operating margin––11.4%19.2%−33.9%–

Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source

Wage index: real estate (indeks)

Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Lied AS fell 53.1 percentage points.

Wage index: real estate per year and the operating margin of Lied AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Wage index: real estate, annual average91.794.396.8103.2108.5111.3 (so far)
Change from the year before+5.2%+2.9%+2.6%+6.5%+5.2%+2.6%
The company's operating margin––11.4%19.2%−33.9%–

Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source

We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.

Analysis · 2025

What the numbers say

Lied AS had an equity ratio of 92.4% in 2025. The company is not ranked: not enough data (below minimum revenue).

From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 19.2% to −33.9% and went from a profit to a loss before tax.

This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.

Estimated value · 2025

Three simple methods

Our calculations

Suggested price: about 0 MNOK

The mean of the 3 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. The methods differ widely (the highest is 82.3 times the lowest), so the estimate is uncertain.
That is about 861 NOK per share, on 360 shares in the shareholder register.

The methods give between 0 MNOK and 1 MNOK.

MethodInputMultipleListed basisEstimate
P/E Net profit (mean 2023–2025): 0.0 MNOK 10.5 0 MNOK 0 MNOK
EV/EBIT Operating profit (mean 2023–2025): 0.0 MNOK
less net debt −0.1 MNOK (rough figure)
19.2 0 MNOK 0 MNOK
P/B Equity: 1.9 MNOK 0.7 1 MNOK 1 MNOK
EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equityNOK
Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple0 MNOK
Enterprise value after the size adjustment0 MNOK
Less net debt (rough figure)0 MNOK
Equity value0 MNOK

Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −208% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.

The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.

The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..

Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more

A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation

Our calculations

Figures you will not find in any register

We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate

Equity paid out or paid in
Equity moved as the result implied in 2025.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure.
Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
Several signs that a generation change may be coming.
  • The chair is 60 or older.
  • The managing director is 60 or older.
  • 1 of 1 on the board are 60 or older.
Age is this year minus the birth year in the registers and can be a year off. It says something about age, not about anyone planning to step down.

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

2025

Questions and answers

How profitable is Lied AS?

The operating margin was −33.9% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −15.2%. The company made a loss before tax.

How solid is Lied AS?

The equity ratio was 92.4% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 0.08 (median 2.10).

What is the liquidity of Lied AS like?

The current ratio was 0.51 in 2025 (median 1.40). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.

Group accounts

The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.

Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.

The shareholder register shows no Norwegian majority owner and no subsidiaries for this company.

Ownership and roles

Loading roles …

Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 2 November 2026. Only names are shown.

Shareholders (2025)

Number of shareholders
2
Largest owner
26.7%
Split
companies 27% · private persons 7% · foreign 0%

Change 2007–2025: 29% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 3 departed owners).
New owners (companies): Lied Eiendom AS

The owners' shares do not add up to the company's total number of shares in the source.

Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.

Error in the data?

Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.

Report an issue

Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information

Figures last fetched 30 October 2026.

Details

Year by year · 2023–2025

Key figure202320242025Trend
Index54––
Rank11,139––
Operating margin11.4%19.2%−33.9%
Return on assets5.9%7.1%−15.2%
Equity ratio83.4%93.4%92.4%
Current ratio0.391.870.51
Revenue growth–−34.7%5.8%

Accounts

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue1.4 MNOK0.9 MNOK0.9 MNOK
Operating profit0.2 MNOK0.2 MNOK−0.3 MNOK
Profit before tax0.2 MNOK0.2 MNOK−0.3 MNOK
Tax expense0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Net profit0.2 MNOK0.2 MNOK−0.3 MNOK
Financial expenses0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Total assets2.6 MNOK2.4 MNOK2.1 MNOK
Current assets0.2 MNOK0.3 MNOK0.1 MNOK
Equity2.2 MNOK2.2 MNOK1.9 MNOK
Retained earnings1.8 MNOK1.9 MNOK1.6 MNOK
Total liabilities0.4 MNOK0.2 MNOK0.2 MNOK
Current liabilities0.4 MNOK0.2 MNOK0.2 MNOK

Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 30 October 2026, accounts id 6352067.