PASH AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
49of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 47 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 20,594 of 38,669 · Handel
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 85 and solidity 13 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
PASH AS is 1 points below the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 36,109 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 78.7% (median 2.5%) and equity ratio 3.1% (median 38.3%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 78.7% | 2.5% |
| Profit margin | 53.8% | 2.2% |
| Return on assets | 14.6% | 4.0% |
| Equity ratio | 3.1% | 38.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | 30.97 | 0.99 |
| Current ratio | 0.02 | 1.70 |
| Revenue growth | 99.8% | 3.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 49, PASH AS does better than 47% of small companies in the same sector (36,578 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- PASH AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
PASH AS has a score of 49 for 2025, rank 20,594 of 38,669 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 91 against peers, revenue growth 99.8% against a median of 3.5%. Profitability: percentile 85 against peers, operating margin 78.7% against a median of 2.5%.
Weakest: Liquidity: percentile 3 against peers, current ratio 0.02 against a median of 1.70. Solidity: percentile 13 against peers, equity ratio 3.1% against a median of 38.3%.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 57.7 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.02 (median 1.70).
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 3.1% (median 38.3%).
- Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have? Based on: revenue growth 99.8% (median 3.5%); current ratio 0.02 (median 1.70).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
PASH AS had an operating margin of 78.7% and an equity ratio of 3.1% in 2025, and ranks 20,594 of 38,669 in Handel.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from 37.9% to 78.7% and went from a loss to a profit before tax.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 0 MNOK and 10 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 10 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | 10 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.0 | 0 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 57.7 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.02 (median 1.70).
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 3.1% (median 38.3%).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 99.8% (median 3.5%); Current ratio 0.02 (median 1.70).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 4.8% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2017, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2017, with a median operating margin of −65.6%. Based on the 11 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 85 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 13 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 3 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 91 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 37 | weight 15% |
Durability: 39 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is PASH AS?
The operating margin was 78.7% in 2025, against a median of 2.5% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 14.6%.
How solid is PASH AS?
The equity ratio was 3.1% in 2025 (median 38.3%). Debt-to-equity was 30.97 (median 0.99).
What is the liquidity of PASH AS like?
The current ratio was 0.02 in 2025 (median 1.70). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does PASH AS compare in Handel?
PASH AS ranks 20,594 of 38,669 in Handel for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 19,272 of 36,578. Revenue changed by 99.8% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 912099644
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Handel (46.850)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 30 April 2013 13 years in operation
- Share capital
- 3.23 MNOK
- Business address
- 3560 HEMSEDAL
- Municipality
- Hemsedal rank 2 of 39 in KOSTRA group 4
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 20 June 2013
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chair of the board
- Philippe Alexander Smith Høgsten
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 27 | 40 | 49 | |
| Rank | 28,230 | 25,206 | 20,594 | |
| Operating margin | 25.1% | 37.9% | 78.7% | |
| Return on assets | 0.7% | 2.4% | 14.6% | |
| Equity ratio | −12.7% | −11.0% | 3.1% | |
| Current ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 186.2% | 99.8% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.3 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.1 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.2 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Total assets | 11.8 MNOK | 15.1 MNOK | 10.1 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Equity | −1.5 MNOK | −1.7 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −4.7 MNOK | −4.9 MNOK | −2.9 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 13.3 MNOK | 16.8 MNOK | 9.8 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.2 MNOK | 9.8 MNOK | 7.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 7213510.
Further
Similar companies
- HAUKEN SAG OG HØVLERI AS index 49, rank 20,591 · compare
- NODELAND BENSIN AS index 49, rank 20,592 · compare
- TNB SANDEFJORD AS index 49, rank 20,593 · compare
- ERINE AS index 49, rank 20,595 · compare
- MEKANISME NORGE AS index 49, rank 20,596 · compare