KILAB AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
67of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 83 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 6,759 of 38,670 · Handel
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 87 and solidity 48 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
KILAB AS is 17 points above the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 36,110 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 14.1% (median 2.5%) and equity ratio 42.7% (median 38.3%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 61 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 14.1% | 2.5% |
| Profit margin | 14.0% | 2.2% |
| Return on assets | 36.5% | 4.0% |
| Equity ratio | 42.7% | 38.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.34 | 0.99 |
| Current ratio | 1.69 | 1.70 |
| Revenue growth | 45.7% | 3.5% |
| Revenue per employee | 5.56 MNOK | 1.62 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 67, KILAB AS does better than 83% of small companies in the same sector (36,579 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- KILAB AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
KILAB AS has a score of 67 for 2025, rank 6,759 of 38,670 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 87 against peers, operating margin 14.1% against a median of 2.5%. Growth: percentile 86 against peers, revenue growth 45.7% against a median of 3.5%.
No area is clearly below its peers.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
KILAB AS had an operating margin of 14.1% and an equity ratio of 42.7% in 2025, and ranks 6,759 of 38,670 in Handel.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 46% and the operating margin rose from 10.6% to 14.1%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 10 MNOK and 75 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 67 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | 75 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.0 | 10 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.8% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2017, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2017, with a median operating margin of −65.6%. Based on the 11 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 87 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 48 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 50 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 86 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 56 | weight 15% |
Durability: 63 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is KILAB AS?
The operating margin was 14.1% in 2025, against a median of 2.5% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 36.5%.
How solid is KILAB AS?
The equity ratio was 42.7% in 2025 (median 38.3%). Debt-to-equity was 1.34 (median 0.99).
What is the liquidity of KILAB AS like?
The current ratio was 1.69 in 2025 (median 1.70).
How does KILAB AS compare in Handel?
KILAB AS ranks 6,759 of 38,670 in Handel for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 6,368 of 36,579. Revenue changed by 45.7% from the year before.
Public contracts
- Contracts awarded since 2024
- 4
- in 3 notices (lots counted separately)
- Total awarded value since 2024
- value not stated
- Framework agreements
- 4
- Left out of the total: the value is a ceiling, not actual spend.
| Date | Buyer | Notice | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 February 2026 | SYKEHUSINNKJØP HF | Laboratoriefrysere til helseforetakene i Helse Sør-Øst og Folkehelseinstituttet- Del 2 | 3.0 MNOK (framework) |
| 24 October 2025 | SYKEHUSINNKJØP HF | Laboratoriefrysere til helseforetakene i Helse Sør-Øst og Folkehelseinstituttet- Ny utlysning | 10.5 MNOK (framework) (2 lots) |
| 17 December 2024 | SYKEHUSINNKJØP HF | Kontraktstildeling: Avtrekkskap og sikkerhetsbenker til Oslo universitetssykehus | value not stated |
| 29 June 2020 | Universitetet i Oslo | Lab Inventar: BL18 rm 4131A & 4131B | value not stated |
Based on notices in Doffin. Does not show call-offs under framework agreements or purchases below the publication threshold. Values are as stated by the buyer.
Source: Doffin (DFØ), fetched 27 October 2026. Winners are matched on organisation number.
Contains data under the Norwegian licence for public data (NLOD 2.0) made available by Doffin/the Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management (DFØ). NLOD 2.0
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 912195759
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Handel (46.640)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 11 registered 10 September 2026
- Founded
- 2 July 2013 13 years in operation
- Share capital
- 2.50 MNOK
- Business address
- Majorvegen 22, 2030 NANNESTAD
- Municipality
- Nannestad rank 17–38 of 38 in KOSTRA group 7
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Dag Indredavik
- Chair of the board
- Dag Indredavik
- Deputy member
- Knut Ingar Indredavik
- Auditor
- BDO AS
- Accountant
- NORSK REGNSKAP AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 55 | 66 | 67 | |
| Rank | 14,213 | 7,071 | 6,759 | |
| Operating margin | 2.3% | 10.6% | 14.1% | |
| Return on assets | 6.2% | 22.6% | 36.5% | |
| Equity ratio | 47.0% | 47.2% | 42.7% | |
| Current ratio | 2.26 | 2.01 | 1.69 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 12.7% | 45.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 37.2 MNOK | 42.0 MNOK | 61.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.9 MNOK | 4.5 MNOK | 8.6 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.7 MNOK | 4.4 MNOK | 8.5 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.6 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK | 6.7 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Total assets | 14.6 MNOK | 20.0 MNOK | 24.1 MNOK |
| Current assets | 14.0 MNOK | 19.1 MNOK | 22.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 6.9 MNOK | 9.5 MNOK | 10.3 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 4.4 MNOK | 7.0 MNOK | 7.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 7.7 MNOK | 10.6 MNOK | 13.8 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 6.2 MNOK | 9.5 MNOK | 13.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 6361337.
Further
Similar companies
- OLE SIMON AS index 67, rank 6,756 · compare
- AXI AS index 67, rank 6,757 · compare
- HVAC NORGE AS index 67, rank 6,758 · compare
- TORSHOV SPORT TROMSØ AS index 67, rank 6,760 · compare
- NORDTRADE ASSURANCE AS index 67, rank 6,761 · compare