Level Mathuset AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
48of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 43 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 1,259 of 2,225 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 4,363 of 8,047 · Overnatting og servering
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 20 and resilience 73 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Level Mathuset AS is 3 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 2,225 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −7.1% (median 5.1%) and equity ratio 53.1% (median 19.6%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 15 MNOK | 16 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −7.1% | 5.1% |
| Profit margin | 1.9% | 4.7% |
| Return on assets | 4.3% | 14.3% |
| Equity ratio | 53.1% | 19.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.88 | 2.93 |
| Current ratio | 1.67 | 1.04 |
| Revenue growth | 40.1% | 5.8% |
| Revenue per employee | 2.56 MNOK | 0.73 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 48, Level Mathuset AS does better than 43% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (2,225 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Level Mathuset AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
141 days | 18 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
1 days | 7 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
13.9% | −10.0% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
7.4% | 52.1% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−20.4 | 11.9 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
1.4% | 0.9% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 20.4% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 2.1 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.1 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Level Mathuset AS has a score of 48 for 2025, rank 4,363 of 8,047 in the sector.
Strongest: Solidity: percentile 84 against peers, equity ratio 53.1% against a median of 19.6%. Liquidity: percentile 80 against peers, current ratio 1.67 against a median of 1.04.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 20 against peers, operating margin −7.1% against a median of 5.1%.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −20.4 (median 11.9); financial costs as a share of debt 1.4% (median 0.9%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −7.1% (median 5.1%).
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 141 days (median 18 days).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Level Mathuset AS fell by 3.4 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.2 points. So the company did 3.6 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Level Mathuset AS moved the same way as comparable companies 0 times. About 19% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −3.7% | 4.9% | −6.4 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points | −9.3 percentage points |
| 2025 | −7.1% | 5.1% | −3.4 percentage points | +0.2 percentage points | −3.6 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Level Mathuset AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: accommodation and food (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: accommodation and food rose 3.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Level Mathuset AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: accommodation and food, annual average | 100.0 | 107.9 | 114.0 | 118.8 | 123.1 | 126.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +7.9% | +5.7% | +4.1% | +3.6% | +3.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 2.7% | −3.7% | −7.1% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: accommodation and food service (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: accommodation and food service rose 2.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Level Mathuset AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: accommodation and food service, annual average | 97.0 | 139.7 | 153.5 | 157.8 | 161.5 | 170.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +23.4% | +44.1% | +9.9% | +2.8% | +2.3% | +5.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 2.7% | −3.7% | −7.1% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Level Mathuset AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 2.7% | −3.7% | −7.1% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Level Mathuset AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 2.7% | −3.7% | −7.1% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Level Mathuset AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 2.7% | −3.7% | −7.1% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: food and beverage service (indeks)
Wage index: food and beverage service rose 6.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Level Mathuset AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: food and beverage service, annual average | 88.0 | 91.3 | 96.4 | 101.5 | 108.1 | 110.6 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +3.8% | +5.6% | +5.4% | +6.5% | +2.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 2.7% | −3.7% | −7.1% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Level Mathuset AS had an operating margin of −7.1% and an equity ratio of 53.1% in 2025, and ranks 4,363 of 8,047 in Overnatting og servering.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 40% and the operating margin fell from −3.7% to −7.1%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 9 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 19.8 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 16.2 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.3 | 9 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (56): Restaurant/Dining.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −20.4 (median 11.9); Financial costs as a share of debt 1.4% (median 0.9%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −7.1% (median 5.1%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 141 days (median 18 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.4% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −12.1%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 20 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 84 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 80 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 58 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 47 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 53 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Level Mathuset AS?
The operating margin was −7.1% in 2025, against a median of 5.1% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 4.3%.
How solid is Level Mathuset AS?
The equity ratio was 53.1% in 2025 (median 19.6%). Debt-to-equity was 0.88 (median 2.93).
What is the liquidity of Level Mathuset AS like?
The current ratio was 1.67 in 2025 (median 1.04).
How does Level Mathuset AS compare in Overnatting og servering?
Level Mathuset AS ranks 4,363 of 8,047 in Overnatting og servering for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 1,259 of 2,225. Revenue changed by 40.1% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE Restaurantdrift AS |  Beaver |
15 MNOK | −2.7% | 17 |
| Big Wolf AS |  Cheetah |
15 MNOK | 16.6% | 73 |
| Colonialen Litteraturhuset AS | Beaver |
15 MNOK | −19.9% | 6 |
| Level Mathuset AS (this company) |  Elephant |
15 MNOK | −7.1% | 48 |
| AN Nam AS |  Lion |
15 MNOK | 10.6% | 79 |
| Bbd AS | Beaver |
15 MNOK | −9.6% | 23 |
| Sabrura Nerstranda AS | Beaver |
15 MNOK | 0.2% | 27 |
| SANS DELIKATESSE & Catering AS | Lion |
15 MNOK | 9.4% | 71 |
| Nihao AS | Cheetah |
15 MNOK | 15.7% | 65 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group accounts
The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Group structure · 2025
10 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Level Group AS.
Level Group AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting (2 companies), Overnatting og servering (3 companies), Bygg og anlegg (2 companies), Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (3 companies) 10 of 10 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 323 in all. Haugesund 323 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Loss
- 1 company: Level Offshore Management AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 2 companies joined the group: Level Offshore AS, Level Offshore Management AS. 6 companies left.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 918632859
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Overnatting og servering (56.110)
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 6 registered 10 February 2026
- Founded
- 9 February 2017 9 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Industrigata 25, 5537 HAUGESUND
- Municipality
- Haugesund rank 1–6 of 13 in KOSTRA group 10
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 60.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Level Group AS (60%)
Ultimate owner: Level Group AS
- Level Group AS · 60.0%
- Rtv Invest AS · 40.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Majority owner of: LM Kantinedrift AS (100%), LM Catering AS (100%)
The portfolio: 3 of the companies it owns shares in have accounts with us, 2 of them as majority owner. The average index is 31. 1 have negative equity and 1 made a loss in the latest year.
Holds shares in: Havn Hotell og Restaurant AS (50%), LM Kantinedrift AS (100%), LM Catering AS (100%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 7 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 65 | 48 | 48 | |
| Rank | 1,836 | 4,030 | 4,363 | |
| Operating margin | 2.7% | −3.7% | −7.1% | |
| Return on assets | 3.0% | 10.5% | 4.3% | |
| Equity ratio | 58.9% | 59.1% | 53.1% | |
| Current ratio | 1.44 | 1.45 | 1.67 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 10.7% | 40.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 9.9 MNOK | 11.0 MNOK | 15.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.3 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | −1.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −1.0 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.0 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 1.3 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 10.2 MNOK | 8.7 MNOK | 8.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 6.1 MNOK | 5.1 MNOK | 6.5 MNOK |
| Equity | 6.0 MNOK | 5.1 MNOK | 4.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 5.9 MNOK | 5.0 MNOK | 4.3 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 4.2 MNOK | 3.6 MNOK | 3.9 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 4.2 MNOK | 3.6 MNOK | 3.9 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 7 November 2026, accounts id 6756590.
Further
Similar companies
- Kløver Hotel AS index 48, rank 4,358 · compare
- Pizza Kompaniet AS index 48, rank 4,359 · compare
- Brødrene Oscars AS index 48, rank 4,361 · compare
- Trixie Restaurant AS index 48, rank 4,365 · compare
- Jæren Pizza AS index 48, rank 4,369 · compare