ELDAR HOLDING AS
Score · fiscal year 2023
83of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 97 % of small companies in the same sector in 2023. What does this mean?
Rank: 130 of 3,738 · Sjømat
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2023, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 62 and solidity 94 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2023. Methodology
Against the sector
ELDAR HOLDING AS is 33 points above the median for small companies in the same sector in 2023.
Median score 50 among 3,282 companies.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | – | 9.0% |
| Profit margin | – | 5.5% |
| Return on assets | 6.1% | 2.7% |
| Equity ratio | 99.6% | 35.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Current ratio | 130.18 | 1.66 |
| Revenue growth | – | 10.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2023. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 83, ELDAR HOLDING AS does better than 97% of small companies in the same sector (3,284 companies) in 2023.
Score 2023–2025
- ELDAR HOLDING AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
What the numbers say
ELDAR HOLDING AS had an operating margin of – and an equity ratio of 99.6% in 2023, and ranks 130 of 3,738 in Sjømat.
This text is generated automatically from the 2023 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 7 MNOK and 28 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 7 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 28 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 703.2% of the debt in 2023. The policy rate averaged 3.54 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
- watch Revenue not reported
- watch No revenue but large assets
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of −5.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 62 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 94 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 97 | weight 15% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 93 | weight 15% |
Index version 2. Data completeness 85%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is ELDAR HOLDING AS?
The operating margin was – in 2023, against a median of 9.0% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 6.1%.
How solid is ELDAR HOLDING AS?
The equity ratio was 99.6% in 2023 (median 35.9%). Debt-to-equity was 0.00 (median 1.08).
What is the liquidity of ELDAR HOLDING AS like?
The current ratio was 130.18 in 2023 (median 1.66).
How does ELDAR HOLDING AS compare in Sjømat?
ELDAR HOLDING AS ranks 130 of 3,738 in Sjømat for 2023. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 112 of 3,284.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 919480718
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Sjømat (03.110)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 26 June 2017 9 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Forraveien 44, 9303 SILSAND (SENJA)
- Municipality
- Senja rank 3–9 of 13 in KOSTRA group 8
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Eldar Geir Pettersen
- Chair of the board
- Eldar Geir Pettersen
- Auditor
- CEDRA NORGE AS
- Accountant
- AKTIVA AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 25 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 83 | 70 | 73 | |
| Rank | 130 | 488 | 335 | |
| Operating margin | – | – | – | |
| Return on assets | 6.1% | −1.0% | 0.5% | |
| Equity ratio | 99.6% | 99.9% | 100.0% | |
| Current ratio | 130.18 | 997.00 | 22,130.48 | |
| Revenue growth | – | – | – |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | – | – | – |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | −2.2 MNOK | −0.9 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.9 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.7 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.9 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | – |
| Total assets | 28.2 MNOK | 27.3 MNOK | 27.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 15.9 MNOK | 14.9 MNOK | 12.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 28.1 MNOK | 27.3 MNOK | 27.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 23.1 MNOK | 22.3 MNOK | 22.5 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 5153387.
Further
Similar companies
- VESTERFJORD AS index 83, rank 127 · compare
- NORDBRIS AS index 83, rank 128 · compare
- DITLEFSEN FISKERISELSKAP AS index 83, rank 129 · compare
- NORDHORDLAND FISKEFOREDLING AS index 83, rank 131 · compare
- AS RØRVIK FISK & FISKMATFORRETNING index 83, rank 132 · compare