Tigertank AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
60of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 73 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 5,153 of 19,113 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 6,417 of 24,223 · Eiendom
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 62 and resilience 52 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Tigertank AS is 10 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 19,108 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 45.2% (median 46.3%) and equity ratio 21.5% (median 27.1%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 45.2% | 46.3% |
| Profit margin | 28.8% | 22.5% |
| Return on assets | 14.9% | 7.6% |
| Equity ratio | 21.5% | 27.1% |
| Debt-to-equity | 3.65 | 2.13 |
| Current ratio | 2.28 | 1.42 |
| Revenue growth | 32.8% | 3.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 60, Tigertank AS does better than 73% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (19,113 companies) in 2025.
Score over time
Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
coming | – | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
coming | – | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
40.8% | −11.9% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
12.2% | 54.4% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
2.8 | 1.7 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
6.9% | 5.0% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
82.8% | 87.7% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.4 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Receivable days and inventory are shown once older accounts have been read again from the raw data. This happens by itself, without new calls to the Brønnøysund Register Centre.
Tigertank AS has a score of 60 for 2025, rank 6,417 of 24,223 in the sector.
Strongest: Consistency: percentile 69 against peers. Growth: percentile 68 against peers, revenue growth 32.8% against a median of 3.5%.
No area is clearly below its peers.
Worth a closer look
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 0.9 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +1.7, the industry +0.9 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Tigertank AS rose by 1.7 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.9 points. So the company did 0.9 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Tigertank AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 20% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43.5% | 45.5% | −5.6 percentage points | +1.0 percentage points | −6.6 percentage points |
| 2025 | 45.2% | 46.3% | +1.7 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Tigertank AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))
House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Tigertank AS rose 1.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House prices (existing homes), annual average | 134.5 | 141.6 | 140.8 | 144.6 | 152.5 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.5% | +5.2% | −0.5% | +2.7% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 49.0% | 43.5% | 45.2% | – |
Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Tigertank AS rose 1.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 49.0% | 43.5% | 45.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))
Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Tigertank AS rose 1.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average | 124.2 | 135.1 | 141.1 | 146.4 | 152.7 | 158.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +8.8% | +4.4% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +3.7% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 49.0% | 43.5% | 45.2% | – |
Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Tigertank AS rose 1.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 102.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 49.0% | 43.5% | 45.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: real estate (indeks)
Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Tigertank AS rose 1.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: real estate, annual average | 91.7 | 94.3 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 108.5 | 111.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 49.0% | 43.5% | 45.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Tigertank AS had an operating margin of 45.2% and an equity ratio of 21.5% in 2025, and ranks 6,417 of 24,223 in Eiendom.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 33%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 0 MNOK and 3 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.5 | 1 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 19.2 | 3 MNOK |
| P/B | 0.7 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 8 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 5 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 2 MNOK |
| Equity value | 3 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is 43% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 6.9% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of 2.9%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 62 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 41 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 62 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 68 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 69 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Tigertank AS?
The operating margin was 45.2% in 2025, against a median of 46.3% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 14.9%.
How solid is Tigertank AS?
The equity ratio was 21.5% in 2025 (median 27.1%). Debt-to-equity was 3.65 (median 2.13).
What is the liquidity of Tigertank AS like?
The current ratio was 2.28 in 2025 (median 1.42).
How does Tigertank AS compare in Eiendom?
Tigertank AS ranks 6,417 of 24,223 in Eiendom for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 5,153 of 19,113. Revenue changed by 32.8% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA Benelin AS |  Lion |
1 MNOK | 31.7% | 61 |
| Tekta Eiendom AS |  Beaver |
1 MNOK | 63.2% | 40 |
| Eiendom og Transport AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | 7.4% | 29 |
| Rtm Eiendomsutvikling AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | 35.7% | 40 |
| Tigertank AS (this company) | Lion |
1 MNOK | 45.2% | 60 |
| Bloch-Lothe Eiendom AS | Lion |
1 MNOK | 81.7% | 65 |
| Ørsta Landhandel AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | 39.4% | 45 |
| D-Street AS | Lion |
1 MNOK | 51.4% | 50 |
| Ppi Stakkevollvegen 307 AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | 38.3% | 38 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
7 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in M-Corp AS. Persons are not shown by name.
M-Corp AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting (2 companies), Transport og lagring (1 company), Handel (2 companies), Eiendom (1 company) 6 of 7 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 22 in all. Stranda 15, Ålesund 7 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 4 companies: Geiranger Adventure AS, Grapa Buss AS, Radi Retail AS, M-Corp AS
- Loss
- 2 companies: Radi Retail AS, M-Corp AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company left.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
M-Corp AS
- Tigertank AS you are here
- Geiranger Adventure AS
- Grapa Buss AS
-
Radi Retail AS
-
Org. no. 981154363
-
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 919740264
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Eiendom (68.200)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 26 September 2017 9 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.30 MNOK
- Business address
- Langelandsvegen 17, 6010 ÅLESUND
- Municipality
- Ålesund rank 2–6 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 3 January 2022
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 3 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: M-Corp AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner M-Corp AS (holds 100%) had negative equity in 2025. made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- M-Corp AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | – | 60 | |
| Rank | – | – | 6,417 | |
| Operating margin | 49.0% | 43.5% | 45.2% | |
| Return on assets | 13.3% | 13.9% | 14.9% | |
| Equity ratio | 17.4% | 18.1% | 21.5% | |
| Current ratio | 2.76 | 1.82 | 2.28 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 20.8% | 32.8% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.7 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.3 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Total assets | 2.5 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK | 3.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.1 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.4 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 2.1 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.4 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 7195745.
Further
Similar companies
- Knarrlagsund Eiendomsdrift AS index 60, rank 6,414 · compare
- Åstvedt Brygge AS index 60, rank 6,415 · compare
- Industrigata 22 AS index 60, rank 6,416 · compare
- Slottsfjellskolen AS index 60, rank 6,418 · compare
- Htn Eiendom AS index 60, rank 6,419 · compare