Dynamik Management AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
51of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 52 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 989 of 2,081 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 2,067 of 4,282 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 37 and resilience 68 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Dynamik Management AS is 1 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 2,079 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −2.9% (median 4.4%) and equity ratio 79.7% (median 38.6%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −2.9% | 4.4% |
| Profit margin | 35.6% | 4.3% |
| Return on assets | 6.6% | 9.1% |
| Equity ratio | 79.7% | 38.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Current ratio | 0.46 | 1.50 |
| Revenue growth | 15.2% | 6.1% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 51, Dynamik Management AS does better than 52% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (2,081 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Dynamik Management AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Dynamik Management AS has a score of 51 for 2025, rank 2,067 of 4,282 in the sector.
Strongest: Solidity: percentile 83 against peers, equity ratio 79.7% against a median of 38.6%. Consistency: percentile 65 against peers.
Weakest: Liquidity: percentile 10 against peers, current ratio 0.46 against a median of 1.50. Profitability: percentile 37 against peers, operating margin −2.9% against a median of 4.4%.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.2 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.46 (median 1.50).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 2.3 percentage points weaker than for comparable companies: the company −2.1, the industry +0.2 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Dynamik Management AS fell by 2.1 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.2 points. So the company did 2.3 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Dynamik Management AS moved the same way as comparable companies 0 times. About 9% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −0.8% | 4.1% | −2.3 percentage points | −0.2 percentage points | −2.1 percentage points |
| 2025 | −2.9% | 4.4% | −2.1 percentage points | +0.2 percentage points | −2.3 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Dynamik Management AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamik Management AS fell 2.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.5% | −0.8% | −2.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamik Management AS fell 2.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.5% | −0.8% | −2.9% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamik Management AS fell 2.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.5% | −0.8% | −2.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamik Management AS fell 2.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.5% | −0.8% | −2.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamik Management AS fell 2.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 102.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.5% | −0.8% | −2.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamik Management AS fell 2.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.5% | −0.8% | −2.9% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Dynamik Management AS had an operating margin of −2.9% and an equity ratio of 79.7% in 2025, and ranks 2,067 of 4,282 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 15% and the operating margin fell from −0.8% to −2.9%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 15 MNOK and 33 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | 15 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.6 | 33 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.2 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.46 (median 1.50).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 37 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 83 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 10 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 52 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 65 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 53 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Dynamik Management AS?
The operating margin was −2.9% in 2025, against a median of 4.4% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 6.6%.
How solid is Dynamik Management AS?
The equity ratio was 79.7% in 2025 (median 38.6%). Debt-to-equity was 0.25 (median 1.07).
What is the liquidity of Dynamik Management AS like?
The current ratio was 0.46 in 2025 (median 1.50). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Dynamik Management AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Dynamik Management AS ranks 2,067 of 4,282 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 989 of 2,081. Revenue changed by 15.2% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raskenlund AS | 3 MNOK | 4.1% | 55 | |
| IT Development AS | 3 MNOK | −8.7% | 40 | |
| Q3 Partners AS | 3 MNOK | 2.6% | 52 | |
| Dynamik Management AS (this company) | 3 MNOK | −2.9% | 51 | |
| Future Then AS | 3 MNOK | 1.0% | 47 | |
| Buro Ops AS | 3 MNOK | −7.5% | 29 | |
| Itavdeling1 AS | 3 MNOK | 9.0% | 58 | |
| Ædify AS | 3 MNOK | 21.2% | 55 | |
| Norict AS | 3 MNOK | 61.5% | 83 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
8 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Advis Eiendom AS.
Advis Eiendom AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (1 company), Informasjon og kommunikasjon (2 companies), Eiendom (2 companies) 5 of 8 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 15 in all. Haugesund 15 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 1 company: K6 Invest AS
- Loss
- 3 companies: Dynamik Software Lab AS, Strandgata 141-143 AS, K6 Invest AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company left: Kaigata 6 AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Advis Eiendom AS
-
Dynamik Management AS you are here
- K6 Invest AS
- Mid-As
-
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 919955066
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.200)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 1 November 2017 9 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.17 MNOK
- Business address
- Haraldsgata 159, 5527 HAUGESUND
- Municipality
- Haugesund rank 1–6 of 13 in KOSTRA group 10
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- LEI
- 5493009HLYESLGK35606 renews 13 October 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 8 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- Advis Eiendom AS (Norway)
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 14 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 52.8% · top three 78.6%
- Split
- companies 97% · private persons 3% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 66%
- Owners over 60
- 0% of the shares held by persons (median age 43)
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Advis Eiendom AS (53%)
Ultimate owner: Advis Eiendom AS
- Advis Eiendom AS · 52.8%
- T.D. Veen AS · 17.1%
- Zonestar Holding AS · 8.8%
- Solbakken AS · 5.7%
- Mcm Westbø AS · 4.4%
- Løå Invest AS · 2.8%
- Sirius AS · 2.8%
- Omniverse AS · 1.4%
- Vito Kapital AS · 1.1%
- Rigmor Invest AS · 0.4%
- 3 private persons · 2.6%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Majority owner of: Advis AS (100%), Dynamik Software Lab AS (100%)
Holds shares in: Dynamik Software Lab AS (100%), Advis AS (100%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 58 | 50 | 51 | |
| Rank | 1,515 | 2,223 | 2,067 | |
| Operating margin | 1.5% | −0.8% | −2.9% | |
| Return on assets | 11.3% | 12.3% | 6.6% | |
| Equity ratio | 78.8% | 80.2% | 79.7% | |
| Current ratio | 1.68 | 0.81 | 0.46 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −17.6% | 15.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.6 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 1.9 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.4 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Net profit | 1.5 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 16.8 MNOK | 17.9 MNOK | 18.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 6.0 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Equity | 13.3 MNOK | 14.4 MNOK | 14.7 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 1.6 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 3.6 MNOK | 3.5 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 3.6 MNOK | 3.5 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 6569319.
Further
Similar companies
- HOBERG & Vestrheim AS index 51, rank 2,061 · compare
- Ludico AS index 51, rank 2,062 · compare
- Alba Tech AS index 51, rank 2,063 · compare
- Proxycom AS index 51, rank 2,064 · compare
- Albon App AS index 51, rank 2,068 · compare