Sloap AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 0.3% Weaker than the industry Industry: 4.0%
- Returns · return on assets 1.0% Weaker than the industry Industry: 9.6%
- Solidity · equity ratio 3.3% Weaker than the industry Industry: 31.4%
- Liquidity · current ratio 2.23 Better than the industry Industry: 1.37
- Growth · revenue growth 8.3% About like the industry Industry: 5.5%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
35of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 25 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 1,571 of 2,104 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 2,438 of 3,245 · Undervisning
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 31 and resilience 31 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Sloap AS is 15 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 2,102 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 0.3% (median 4.0%) and equity ratio 3.3% (median 31.4%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 42 % from 2023 to 2025, to 3.8 MNOK. The operating margin is about the same: 0.3% in 2025 against 0.0% in 2023. The equity ratio fell from 5.1% in 2023 to 3.3% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.7 MNOK | 3.5 MNOK | 3.8 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.3 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.2 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 920145019
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Undervisning (85.597)
- Purpose
- Selskapet er et ideellt aksjeselskap med allmennyttig og sosial karakter. Selskapets fokus er rettet mot barn og unge som velger alternative utdanningsveier og unge som driver egenorganisert aktivitet utenom skolen. SLOAP (Space Left Over After Planning) skal -tilby et makerspace på tvers av alder -drive næringsvirksomhet med utgangspunkt i ungdommenes egne initiativ, spesielt i forbindelse med triksesparkesykling, street art o.l. -holde kurs og foredragsvirksomhet for å inspirere og støtte ungdoms egne initiativ til entreprenørskap og egenaktivitet/ læring -være støttespiller og møtested …
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 5 registered 10 July 2026
- Founded
- 19 November 2017 8 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.15 MNOK
- Business address
- Østerdalsgata 1K, 0658 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 19 December 2017
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Sloap AS has a score of 35 for 2025, rank 2,438 of 3,245 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 73 against peers, current ratio 2.23 against a median of 1.37.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 13 against peers, equity ratio 3.3% against a median of 31.4%. Profitability: percentile 31 against peers, operating margin 0.3% against a median of 4.0%.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) 0.2 (median 4.8); financial costs as a share of debt 3.7% (median 0.8%).
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 3.3% (median 31.4%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −0.9% (median 3.7%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) 0.2 (median 4.8); Financial costs as a share of debt 3.7% (median 0.8%).
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 3.3% (median 31.4%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −0.9% (median 3.7%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 3.7% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −5.7%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 31 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 13 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 73 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 49 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 46 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 37 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 4 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 0.3% | 4.0% |
| Profit margin | −0.9% | 3.7% |
| Return on assets | 1.0% | 9.6% |
| Equity ratio | 3.3% | 31.4% |
| Debt-to-equity | 29.60 | 1.45 |
| Current ratio | 2.23 | 1.37 |
| Revenue growth | 8.3% | 5.5% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.76 MNOK | 0.49 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 35, Sloap AS does better than 25% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (2,104 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Sloap AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
14 days | 20 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
81 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
10.9% | −10.5% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
22.9% | 73.8% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
0.2 | 4.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
3.7% | 0.8% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 22.4% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.4 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Sloap AS fell by 1.4 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.9 points. So the company did 2.3 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Sloap AS moved the same way as comparable companies 0 times. About 25% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.7% | 3.1% | +1.7 percentage points | −0.6 percentage points | +2.3 percentage points |
| 2025 | 0.3% | 4.0% | −1.4 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points | −2.3 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Sloap AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Sloap AS fell 1.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.3% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Sloap AS fell 1.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.3% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: education (indeks)
Wage index: education rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Sloap AS fell 1.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: education, annual average | 88.6 | 91.8 | 96.8 | 101.8 | 106.7 | 110.5 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.9% | +3.6% | +5.5% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.3% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Sloap AS had an operating margin of 0.3% and an equity ratio of 3.3% in 2025, and ranks 2,438 of 3,245 in Undervisning.
From 2024 to 2025: went from a profit to a loss before tax.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 0 MNOK and 0 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.8 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 12.2 | 0 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.8 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 0 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 0 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 0 MNOK |
| Equity value | 0 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −174% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Education.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Sloap AS?
The operating margin was 0.3% in 2025, against a median of 4.0% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 1.0%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Sloap AS?
The equity ratio was 3.3% in 2025 (median 31.4%). Debt-to-equity was 29.60 (median 1.45).
What is the liquidity of Sloap AS like?
The current ratio was 2.23 in 2025 (median 1.37).
How does Sloap AS compare in Undervisning?
Sloap AS ranks 2,438 of 3,245 in Undervisning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 1,571 of 2,104. Revenue changed by 8.3% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lillehammer Ballettskole AS |  Lion |
4 MNOK | 8.0% | 63 |
| Lærling Øst AS | Lion |
4 MNOK | 3.9% | 60 |
| Multibemanning AS · same municipality |  Cheetah |
4 MNOK | 9.9% | 43 |
| Leadsuccesses AS | Lion |
4 MNOK | 15.4% | 58 |
| Sloap AS (this company) |  Beaver |
4 MNOK | 0.3% | 35 |
| Hamna Gård AS | Beaver |
4 MNOK | −12.6% | 31 |
| Isogaisa Siida AS | Lion |
4 MNOK | 18.9% | 85 |
| Eiendomsfag Gruppen AS · same municipality | Beaver |
4 MNOK | 0.7% | 54 |
| E-Håndverk AS · same municipality | Beaver |
4 MNOK | 7.3% | 55 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 30 | 45 | 35 | |
| Rank | 2,531 | 2,078 | 2,438 | |
| Operating margin | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.3% | |
| Return on assets | 0.1% | 4.3% | 1.0% | |
| Equity ratio | 5.1% | 5.6% | 3.3% | |
| Current ratio | 2.99 | 2.39 | 2.23 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 31.0% | 8.3% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.7 MNOK | 3.5 MNOK | 3.8 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.3 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.3 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.2 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.4 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 6914702.
Further
Similar companies
- Fulltfokus AS index 35, rank 2,440 · compare
- TK Gruppen AS index 35, rank 2,441 · compare
- Sentrum Trafikkskol1 AS index 35, rank 2,442 · compare
- Stall Bergsund AS index 35, rank 2,443 · compare
- Total HMS AS index 35, rank 2,444 · compare