Plott AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
49of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 49 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 1,071 of 2,081 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 2,261 of 4,282 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 33 and resilience 75 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Plott AS is 1 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 2,079 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −0.9% (median 4.4%) and equity ratio 65.8% (median 38.6%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −0.9% | 4.4% |
| Profit margin | 0.5% | 4.3% |
| Return on assets | 1.5% | 9.1% |
| Equity ratio | 65.8% | 38.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.52 | 1.07 |
| Current ratio | 2.93 | 1.50 |
| Revenue growth | 7.4% | 6.1% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 49, Plott AS does better than 49% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (2,081 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Plott AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
The accounts for 2025 lack the figures needed: revenue, current assets, current liabilities, debt or financial costs.
Plott AS has a score of 49 for 2025, rank 2,261 of 4,282 in the sector.
Strongest: Consistency: percentile 81 against peers. Liquidity: percentile 76 against peers, current ratio 2.93 against a median of 1.50.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 33 against peers, operating margin −0.9% against a median of 4.4%. Growth: percentile 39 against peers, revenue growth 7.4% against a median of 6.1%.
Worth a closer look
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 7.7 percentage points weaker than for comparable companies: the company −7.5, the industry +0.2 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Plott AS fell by 7.5 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.2 points. So the company did 7.7 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Plott AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 5% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6.5% | 4.1% | +0.1 percentage points | −0.2 percentage points | +0.3 percentage points |
| 2025 | −0.9% | 4.4% | −7.5 percentage points | +0.2 percentage points | −7.7 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Plott AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Plott AS fell 7.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 6.4% | 6.5% | −0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Plott AS fell 7.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 6.4% | 6.5% | −0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Plott AS fell 7.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 6.4% | 6.5% | −0.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Plott AS fell 7.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 6.4% | 6.5% | −0.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Plott AS fell 7.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 102.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 6.4% | 6.5% | −0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Plott AS fell 7.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 6.4% | 6.5% | −0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Plott AS had an operating margin of −0.9% and an equity ratio of 65.8% in 2025, and ranks 2,261 of 4,282 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 6.5% to −0.9% and the equity ratio rose from 48.0% to 65.8%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 1 MNOK and 2 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | 1 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | 2 MNOK |
| P/B | 3.6 | 2 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 2 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 1 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −1 MNOK |
| Equity value | 2 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −87% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.9% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 33 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 71 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 76 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 39 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 81 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 52 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Plott AS?
The operating margin was −0.9% in 2025, against a median of 4.4% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 1.5%.
How solid is Plott AS?
The equity ratio was 65.8% in 2025 (median 38.6%). Debt-to-equity was 0.52 (median 1.07).
What is the liquidity of Plott AS like?
The current ratio was 2.93 in 2025 (median 1.50).
How does Plott AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Plott AS ranks 2,261 of 4,282 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 1,071 of 2,081. Revenue changed by 7.4% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lightcarrier AS |  Beaver |
4 MNOK | −3.2% | 35 |
| Afini AS · same municipality |  Lion |
4 MNOK | 24.7% | 73 |
| Lineo AS | Beaver |
4 MNOK | −1.4% | 39 |
| R & R Technology AS | Lion |
4 MNOK | 38.1% | 80 |
| Prosa Security AS · same municipality | Beaver |
4 MNOK | −2.3% | 33 |
| Plott AS (this company) |  Elephant |
3 MNOK | −0.9% | 49 |
| Øian Technology AS | Lion |
3 MNOK | 66.5% | 80 |
| Raskenlund AS | Lion |
3 MNOK | 4.1% | 55 |
| IT Development AS | Beaver |
3 MNOK | −8.7% | 40 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Public contracts
- Contracts awarded since 2024
- 1
- Total awarded value since 2024
- value not stated
- Framework agreements
- 1
- Left out of the total: the value is a ceiling, not actual spend.
| Date | Buyer | Notice | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 October 2024 | STATPED | E-læringskurs og kompetanseutvikling | 2.0 MNOK (framework) |
| 4 September 2023 | Statens vegvesen | Rammeavtale for kjøp av konsulenttjenester innen pedagogisk rådgivning og produksjon av digitalt læremateriell | 20.0 MNOK (framework) |
Based on notices in Doffin. Does not show call-offs under framework agreements or purchases below the publication threshold. Values are as stated by the buyer.
Dependence on public contracts
Awarded value in the year seen against revenue the same year. This is not a share of revenue: the value is the whole contract, often for several years, and it does not necessarily become revenue that year.
| Year | Contracts | Awarded value | Awarded value against revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | not stated | – |
| 2023 | 0 | not stated | – |
Framework agreements are left out (1 since 2024, with ceilings of 2.0 MNOK in all). A ceiling is not a purchase.
Largest public buyers since 2024
| Buyer | Contracts | Value | Share of value |
|---|---|---|---|
| STATPED | 1 | not stated | – |
Key contracts
Largest framework agreements (ceiling, not spend)
| Date | Buyer | Contract | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 September 2023 | Statens vegvesen | Rammeavtale for kjøp av konsulenttjenester innen pedagogisk rådgivning og produksjon av digitalt læremateriell | 20.0 MNOK (framework) |
| 1 October 2024 | STATPED | E-læringskurs og kompetanseutvikling | 2.0 MNOK (framework) |
- The value is the whole contract as stated by the buyer, often for several years.
- Framework agreements are left out of the sums, since the value is a ceiling. Many frameworks are not marked in Doffin and may still be included.
- Only awards where Doffin gives the company's organisation number.
- Contracts without a stated value are counted but not summed.
- An indication of dependence, not an accounting figure. End dates are rarely in the Doffin data.
Source: Doffin (DFØ), fetched 27 October 2026. Winners are matched on organisation number.
Contains data under the Norwegian licence for public data (NLOD 2.0) made available by Doffin/the Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management (DFØ). NLOD 2.0
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 920458513
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.200)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 8 February 2018 8 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- MESH, Tordenskiolds gate 2, 0160 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 19 February 2018
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- Website
- www.plott.as
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 3 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2
- Largest owner
- 50.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 50%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 53 | 55 | 49 | |
| Rank | 1,888 | 1,739 | 2,261 | |
| Operating margin | 6.4% | 6.5% | −0.9% | |
| Return on assets | 11.1% | 11.7% | 1.5% | |
| Equity ratio | 37.3% | 48.0% | 65.8% | |
| Current ratio | 1.55 | 1.88 | 2.93 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 0.9% | 7.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.2 MNOK | 3.3 MNOK | 3.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.9 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.8 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.7 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.7 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.2 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.2 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 6400309.
Further
Similar companies
- Guilty Tech AS index 49, rank 2,253 · compare
- Batong Media AS index 49, rank 2,255 · compare
- UR Solutions AS index 49, rank 2,258 · compare
- Flytende Film AS index 49, rank 2,259 · compare
- Fiberlink AS index 49, rank 2,260 · compare