HAALAND AS
Accounts for 2025 are missing. The deadline was 31 July 2026. The Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish when accounts arrived, only the latest year filed.
Score · fiscal year 2023
32of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 25 % of small companies in the same sector in 2023. What does this mean?
Rank: 16,646 of 22,175 · Bygg og anlegg
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2023, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 15 and solidity 33 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2023. Methodology
Against the sector
HAALAND AS is 18 points below the median for small companies in the same sector in 2023.
Median score 50 among 21,461 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2023: operating margin −99.5% (median 4.0%) and equity ratio 24.1% (median 34.6%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 11 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −99.5% | 4.0% |
| Profit margin | −118.0% | 3.6% |
| Return on assets | −3.4% | 5.6% |
| Equity ratio | 24.1% | 34.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | 3.15 | 1.33 |
| Current ratio | 0.27 | 1.39 |
| Revenue growth | 1,286.4% | 3.7% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.04 MNOK | 1.32 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2023. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 32, HAALAND AS does better than 25% of small companies in the same sector (21,505 companies) in 2023.
Score 2022–2024
- HAALAND AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
What the numbers say
HAALAND AS had an operating margin of −99.5% and an equity ratio of 24.1% in 2023, and ranks 16,646 of 22,175 in Bygg og anlegg.
From 2022 to 2023: revenue grew by 1,286% and the operating margin fell from −81.0% to −99.5%.
HAALAND AS did weaker than the sector in 2022, the sector's weakest year.
This text is generated automatically from the 2023 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 34 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 34 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 3.7 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.27 (median 1.39).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −118.0% (median 3.6%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −99.5% (median 4.0%).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 1,286.4% (median 3.7%); Current ratio 0.27 (median 1.39).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
The operating margin was −81.0% in 2022 (sector median 2.1%), and the equity ratio 46.2%. The company had a loss before tax that year. In the other years the operating margin averaged −54.5%.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 2.1%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 15 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 33 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 8 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 98 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 24 | weight 15% |
Durability: 38 (average over 2 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is HAALAND AS?
The operating margin was −99.5% in 2023, against a median of 4.0% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −3.4%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is HAALAND AS?
The equity ratio was 24.1% in 2023 (median 34.6%). Debt-to-equity was 3.15 (median 1.33).
What is the liquidity of HAALAND AS like?
The current ratio was 0.27 in 2023 (median 1.39). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does HAALAND AS compare in Bygg og anlegg?
HAALAND AS ranks 16,646 of 22,175 in Bygg og anlegg for 2023. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 16,074 of 21,505. Revenue changed by 1,286.4% from the year before.
Group accounts · 2022
36 of 100
Rank 14 of 18 groups with group accounts. Groups are ranked only against each other, not against single companies.
| Key figure | The group | The company alone (2023) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | −2.7% | – |
| Return on assets | −2.7% | – |
| Equity ratio | 20.2% | – |
| Current ratio | 0.77 | – |
| Revenue growth | – | – |
Same formulas and weights as the company index. Group and company are never added together, and the group accounts are not part of sector averages or company rankings.
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre, group accounts 2022 (open data, NLOD 2.0).
We do not show the group structure, because open data does not say who owns whom.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 920520146
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Bygg og anlegg (43.210)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 258 registered 10 September 2026
- Founded
- 21 December 2017 8 years in operation
- Share capital
- 1.24 MNOK
- Business address
- Søderlundmyra 18, 8622 MO I RANA
- Municipality
- Rana rank 12–25 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Latest accounts filed
- 2024
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Espen Haaland
- Chair of the board
- Espen Haaland
- Board member
- Helge Gjøsæter
- Board member
- Ellen Bromstad Myrvold
- Auditor
- HELGELAND REVISJON AS
- Accountant
- MERKANTIL CONSULT AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 25 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2022–2024
| Key figure | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 43 | 32 | 17 | |
| Rank | 267 | 16,646 | 22,098 | |
| Operating margin | −81.0% | −99.5% | −9.4% | |
| Return on assets | 2.2% | −3.4% | −13.9% | |
| Equity ratio | 46.2% | 24.1% | −7.6% | |
| Current ratio | 0.84 | 0.27 | 0.45 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 1,286.4% | 4,234.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.8 MNOK | 10.6 MNOK | 460.6 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.6 MNOK | −10.6 MNOK | −43.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −11.0 MNOK | −12.5 MNOK | −46.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | −11.0 MNOK | −11.5 MNOK | −31.7 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 13.1 MNOK | 7.6 MNOK | 9.9 MNOK |
| Total assets | 99.3 MNOK | 142.9 MNOK | 261.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 34.0 MNOK | 19.9 MNOK | 104.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 45.9 MNOK | 34.4 MNOK | −19.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | – | – | −20.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 53.4 MNOK | 108.5 MNOK | 281.2 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 40.4 MNOK | 74.7 MNOK | 234.5 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 5423171.
Further
Similar companies
- GOD LAG AS index 32, rank 16,643 · compare
- RØNAAS ENTREPRENØR AS index 32, rank 16,644 · compare
- VIMEMBRAN AS index 32, rank 16,645 · compare
- SAMARTEAN AS index 32, rank 16,647 · compare
- TORBJØRN HVAM AS index 32, rank 16,648 · compare