Ersgaard AS

Org. no. 920623719 · Lillehammer · AS

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

Key facts

Employees – Not registered in the Central Coordinating Register
Operating revenue · 2025 0.4 MNOK Micro
Net profit · 2025 3.8 MNOK
Equity · 2025 12.7 MNOK
Founded 2018 8 years in operation
Sector Eiendom 68.120
Quick check · fiscal year 2025

Is the company run well?

Five key figures against companies in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.

  • Profitability · operating margin −453.5% Weaker than the industry Industry: 47.7%
  • Returns · return on assets 13.1% Better than the industry Industry: 7.8%
  • Solidity · equity ratio 34.5% Better than the industry Industry: 27.9%
  • Liquidity · current ratio 1.22 Weaker than the industry Industry: 1.40
  • Growth · revenue growth 79.2% Better than the industry Industry: 3.3%

The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology

Score · fiscal year 2025

Not enough data: Not enough data (below minimum revenue)

Based on the annual accounts for 2025

Source: Register of Company Accounts and Central Coordinating RegisterFetched 8 November 2026Report an issue
Development

How it has gone · 2023–2025

Revenue rose by 361 % from 2023 to 2025, to 0.4 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −1,148.5% in 2023 to −453.5% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 53.9% in 2023 to 34.5% in 2025.

Operating revenue · 2025 0.4 MNOK +361% since 2023 (better)
Net profit · 2025 3.8 MNOK +218% since 2023 (better)
Operating margin · 2025 −453.5% +695.0 pp since 2023 (better)
Equity ratio · 2025 34.5% −19.4 pp since 2023 (weaker)
Current ratio · 2025 1.22 −0.48 since 2023 (weaker)

Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year

Accounts in short

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue0.1 MNOK0.2 MNOK0.4 MNOK
Operating profit−1.0 MNOK−0.8 MNOK−1.7 MNOK
Net profit1.2 MNOK4.0 MNOK3.8 MNOK
Total assets30.2 MNOK42.9 MNOK36.8 MNOK
Equity16.3 MNOK9.7 MNOK12.7 MNOK
Total liabilities13.9 MNOK33.2 MNOK24.1 MNOK

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year

From the Central Coordinating Register

Org. no.
920623719
Legal form
AS
Sector
Eiendom (68.120)
Purpose
Kjøp, utvikling, drift og salg av eiendommer, herunder deltagelse i andre selskaper med tilsvarende virksomhet.
Morning company class
Micro
Employees
0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 0.3 MNOK (2025).
Founded
1 March 2018 8 years in operation
Share capital
0.09 MNOK
Business address
Storgata 100, 2615 LILLEHAMMER
Municipality
Lillehammer rank 3–14 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
Latest accounts filed
2025
VAT registered
Yes
The company's business municipality, Lillehammer. The map shows the municipality, not the address. Map source: Kartverket (CC BY 4.0).

Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre

Indications · 2025

Worth a closer look

  • critical

    The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?

    Based on: Interest coverage (times) −2.2 (median 1.8); Financial costs as a share of debt 3.3% (median 5.0%).

  • watch

    The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?

    Based on: Operating margin −453.5% (median 47.7%).

  • watch

    Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?

    Based on: Receivable days 27,216 days (median 40 days).

Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.

Financial costs were 3.3% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.

See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector

Data quality

  • watch Extreme margin: check the figures
Stress test · 2022

Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year

We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.

The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology

Key figures · 2025

The numbers behind the score

The numbers behind the score · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianAhead of
Operating revenue0 MNOK2 MNOK
Operating margin −453.5% 47.7% not compared
Profit margin 1,040.4% 24.4% shown, not part of the index
Return on assets 13.1% 7.8% not compared
Equity ratio 34.5% 27.9% not compared
Debt-to-equity 1.90 2.10 not compared
Current ratio 1.22 1.40 not compared
Revenue growth 79.2% 3.3% not compared

The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.

Over time

Score over time

Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.

Working capital and debt · 2025

Working capital and debt

Working capital and debt · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianHigher than
Working capital
Receivable days
All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue.
27,216 days 40 days not compared
Inventory and other current assets, days
Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue.
0 days 0 days not compared
Net working capital to revenue
Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations.
1,198.1% −12.4% not compared
Cash share of current assets
How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash.
2.1% 54.9% not compared
Debt and interest burden
Interest coverage (times)
Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt.
−2.2 1.8 not compared
Financial costs as a share of debt
All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate.
3.3% 5.0% not compared
Long-term share of debt
Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year.
– 87.8% not compared

The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.

Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 4.6 MNOK.

Of the financial costs of 0.8 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.

The median and the bar refer to companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.

The industry or the company: what drove the result?

In 2025 the operating margin of Ersgaard AS fell by 89.7 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 90.4 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.

Over 2 year-to-year changes Ersgaard AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 0% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.

The operating margin of Ersgaard AS against comparable companies, year by year
YearThe companyComparable (median) Change, companyChange, industryThe company's own
2024−363.9%46.9% +784.6 percentage points +0.9 percentage points +783.7 percentage points
2025−453.5%47.7% −89.7 percentage points +0.7 percentage points −90.4 percentage points

Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.

The company and its sector's drivers

Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Ersgaard AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.

House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))

House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Ersgaard AS fell 89.7 percentage points.

House prices (existing homes) per year and the operating margin of Ersgaard AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
House prices (existing homes), annual average134.5141.6140.8144.6152.5158.7 (so far)
Change from the year before+10.5%+5.2%−0.5%+2.7%+5.5%+4.1%
The company's operating margin––−1,148.5%−363.9%−453.5%–

Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source

Policy rate (prosent)

Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Ersgaard AS fell 89.7 percentage points.

Policy rate per year and the operating margin of Ersgaard AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Policy rate, annual average0.081.323.544.504.304.17 (so far)
Change from the year before−0.28 percentage points+1.24 percentage points+2.22 percentage points+0.96 percentage points−0.20 percentage points−0.12 percentage points
The company's operating margin––−1,148.5%−363.9%−453.5%–

Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source

Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))

Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Ersgaard AS fell 89.7 percentage points.

Construction cost index for dwellings per year and the operating margin of Ersgaard AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average124.2135.1141.1146.4152.7158.4 (so far)
Change from the year before+8.7%+8.8%+4.4%+3.7%+4.3%+3.7%
The company's operating margin––−1,148.5%−363.9%−453.5%–

Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source

Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))

Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Ersgaard AS fell 89.7 percentage points.

Consumer price index per year and the operating margin of Ersgaard AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Consumer price index, annual average84.389.294.197.0100.0103.0 (so far)
Change from the year before+3.5%+5.8%+5.5%+3.2%+3.0%+3.0%
The company's operating margin––−1,148.5%−363.9%−453.5%–

Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source

Wage index: real estate (indeks)

Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Ersgaard AS fell 89.7 percentage points.

Wage index: real estate per year and the operating margin of Ersgaard AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Wage index: real estate, annual average91.794.396.8103.2108.5111.3 (so far)
Change from the year before+5.2%+2.9%+2.6%+6.5%+5.2%+2.6%
The company's operating margin––−1,148.5%−363.9%−453.5%–

Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source

We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.

Analysis · 2025

What the numbers say

Ersgaard AS had an equity ratio of 34.5% in 2025. The company is not ranked: not enough data (below minimum revenue).

From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from −363.9% to −453.5% and revenue grew by 79%.

This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.

Estimated value · 2025

Three simple methods

The methods give between 7 MNOK and 21 MNOK.

MethodInputMultipleListed basisEstimate
P/E Net profit (mean 2023–2025): 3.0 MNOK 11.3 34 MNOK 21 MNOK
EV/EBIT Operating profit (mean 2023–2025): −1.2 MNOK 16.6 – not meaningful
P/B Equity: 12.7 MNOK 0.9 11 MNOK 7 MNOK

The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.

The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.1): Real Estate (Development).

Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more

A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation

2025

Questions and answers

How profitable is Ersgaard AS?

The operating margin was −453.5% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 13.1%.

How solid is Ersgaard AS?

The equity ratio was 34.5% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 1.90 (median 2.10).

What is the liquidity of Ersgaard AS like?

The current ratio was 1.22 in 2025 (median 1.40).

Group structure · 2025

21 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.

No owner holds more than half of the shares in Ersgaard AS.

Ersgaard AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.

The group in figures

Sectors
Eiendom (19 companies) 19 of 21 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
Negative equity
11 companies: Ersgaard Storgata AS, Ersgaard Moelv 1 AS, Ersgaard Raufoss AS, Ersgaard Hafjell AS, Ersgaard Einar Sandbergs Veg AS, Ersgaard Øvre AS …
Loss
15 companies: Ersgaard Bolig AS, Ersgaard Storgata AS, Ersgaard Moelv 1 AS, Ersgaard Raufoss AS, Ersgaard Hafjell AS, Ersgaard Hammerseng AS …

A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.

The tree shows up to 4 levels below the top. Large groups have more companies than shown.

Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.

Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.

Ownership and roles

Loading roles …

Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 3 November 2026. Only names are shown.

Shareholders (2025)

Number of shareholders
2
Largest owner
50.0%
Split
companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
Owned from the same municipality
50%

The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.

Majority owner of: Ersgaard Hafjell AS (100%), Ersgaard Bolig AS (100%), Redskapshuset AS (100%), Ersgaard Einar Sandbergs Veg AS (100%), Ersgaard Bolig Iii AS (100%), Ersgaard Storgata AS (100%), Ersgaard Inge Krokans Veg AS (100%), Ersgaard Moelv 1 AS (100%)

The portfolio: 20 of the companies it owns shares in have accounts with us, 16 of them as majority owner. The average index is 47. 12 have negative equity and 18 made a loss in the latest year.

Holds shares in: Ersgaard Hafjell AS (100%), Ersgaard Bolig AS (100%), Ersgaard Bolig Iii AS (100%), Ersgaard Storgata AS (100%), Ersgaard Inge Krokans Veg AS (100%), Ersgaard Moelv 1 AS (100%), Bow Eiendom AS (100%), Ersgaard Stabbursvegen AS (100%)

Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.

Error in the data?

Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.

Report an issue

Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information

Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.

Details

Year by year · 2023–2025

Key figure202320242025Trend
Index–––
Rank–––
Operating margin−1,148.5%−363.9%−453.5%
Return on assets7.8%11.2%13.1%
Equity ratio53.9%22.6%34.5%
Current ratio1.701.091.22
Revenue growth–157.2%79.2%

Accounts

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue0.1 MNOK0.2 MNOK0.4 MNOK
Operating profit−1.0 MNOK−0.8 MNOK−1.7 MNOK
Profit before tax1.2 MNOK4.9 MNOK4.0 MNOK
Tax expense0.0 MNOK0.8 MNOK0.2 MNOK
Net profit1.2 MNOK4.0 MNOK3.8 MNOK
Financial expenses1.2 MNOK0.0 MNOK0.8 MNOK
Total assets30.2 MNOK42.9 MNOK36.8 MNOK
Current assets23.6 MNOK36.2 MNOK29.3 MNOK
Equity16.3 MNOK9.7 MNOK12.7 MNOK
Retained earnings12.6 MNOK6.0 MNOK9.0 MNOK
Total liabilities13.9 MNOK33.2 MNOK24.1 MNOK
Current liabilities13.9 MNOK33.2 MNOK24.1 MNOK

Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 7089562.