Squeeze AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
16of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 1 % of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Medium: 214 of 217 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 2,598 of 2,735 · Annen tjenesteyting
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 11 and solidity 0 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Squeeze AS is 33 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 49 among 217 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −2.2% (median 2.7%) and equity ratio −15.7% (median 26.4%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 96 MNOK | 118 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −2.2% | 2.7% |
| Profit margin | −2.0% | 2.4% |
| Return on assets | −4.8% | 8.8% |
| Equity ratio | −15.7% | 26.4% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 2.78 |
| Current ratio | 0.62 | 1.32 |
| Revenue growth | 8.1% | 8.9% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.61 MNOK | 4.54 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 16, Squeeze AS does better than 1% of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector (217 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Squeeze AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector
Squeeze AS has a score of 16 for 2025, rank 2,598 of 2,735 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 49 against peers, revenue growth 8.1% against a median of 8.9%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −15.7% against a median of 26.4%. Liquidity: percentile 3 against peers, current ratio 0.62 against a median of 1.32.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −15.7% (median 26.4%).
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.6 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.62 (median 1.32).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −2.0% (median 2.4%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Squeeze AS fell by 9.4 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.3 points. So the company did 9.7 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Squeeze AS moved the same way as comparable companies 0 times. About 2% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7.2% | 2.4% | +7.0 percentage points | +0.1 percentage points | +6.9 percentage points |
| 2025 | −2.2% | 2.7% | −9.4 percentage points | +0.3 percentage points | −9.7 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Squeeze AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Squeeze AS fell 9.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 102.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 0.2% | 7.2% | −2.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Squeeze AS fell 9.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 0.2% | 7.2% | −2.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: other personal services (indeks)
Wage index: other personal services rose 4.9% in 2025; the operating margin of Squeeze AS fell 9.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: other personal services, annual average | 89.0 | 93.2 | 98.3 | 103.2 | 108.3 | 111.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.1% | +4.8% | +5.4% | +5.0% | +4.9% | +3.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 0.2% | 7.2% | −2.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Squeeze AS had an operating margin of −2.2% and an equity ratio of −15.7% in 2025, and ranks 2,598 of 2,735 in Annen tjenesteyting.
From 2024 to 2025: went from a profit to a loss before tax and the operating margin fell from 7.2% to −2.2%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 13 MNOK and 20 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 19.2 | 13 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 15.1 | 20 MNOK |
| P/B | 2.4 | not meaningful |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered by 51% for an unlisted company: 20% for lack of marketability and 38% for size (a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity).
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −15.7% (median 26.4%).
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.6 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.62 (median 1.32).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −2.0% (median 2.4%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −2.2% (median 2.7%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.8% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of −0.3%. Based on the 9 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 11 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 3 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 49 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 31 | weight 15% |
Durability: 21 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Squeeze AS?
The operating margin was −2.2% in 2025, against a median of 2.7% among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector. Return on assets was −4.8%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Squeeze AS?
The equity ratio was −15.7% in 2025 (median 26.4%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of Squeeze AS like?
The current ratio was 0.62 in 2025 (median 1.32). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Squeeze AS compare in Annen tjenesteyting?
Squeeze AS ranks 2,598 of 2,735 in Annen tjenesteyting for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Medium it is number 214 of 217. Revenue changed by 8.1% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 920970648
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Annen tjenesteyting (96.230)
- Morning company class
- Medium
- Employees
- 157 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 4 May 2018 8 years in operation
- Share capital
- 1.45 MNOK
- Business address
- Parkveien 12, 0350 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 31 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 187
- Largest owner
- 34.0% · top three 49.9%
- Split
- companies 97% · private persons 3% · foreign 1%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 82%
- Owners over 60
- 1% of the shares held by persons (median age 37)
- ASKELADDEN & CO 1 AS · 34.0%
- Monstro AS · 9.2%
- Stenshagen Invest AS · 6.7%
- Nicob Holding AS · 6.1%
- Mojo Partners AS · 5.9%
- Vezto SQ AS · 4.6%
- Nordvegen Invest AS · 4.0%
- Amigo Holding AS · 3.9%
- Schütt Happens AS · 3.8%
- Zola Holding AS · 2.5%
- 65 private persons · 2.6%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 31 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 9 | 38 | 16 | |
| Rank | 2,490 | 1,918 | 2,598 | |
| Operating margin | 0.2% | 7.2% | −2.2% | |
| Return on assets | 1.4% | 20.0% | −4.8% | |
| Equity ratio | −42.8% | −19.2% | −15.7% | |
| Current ratio | 0.39 | 0.60 | 0.62 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 3.3% | 8.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 86.3 MNOK | 89.2 MNOK | 96.4 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.2 MNOK | 6.4 MNOK | −2.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.1 MNOK | 6.3 MNOK | −2.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | 6.3 MNOK | −2.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.5 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Total assets | 30.0 MNOK | 34.3 MNOK | 34.2 MNOK |
| Current assets | 15.2 MNOK | 23.0 MNOK | 23.3 MNOK |
| Equity | −12.8 MNOK | −6.6 MNOK | −5.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −14.2 MNOK | −8.0 MNOK | −6.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 42.8 MNOK | 40.8 MNOK | 39.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 38.9 MNOK | 38.5 MNOK | 37.9 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 31 October 2026, accounts id 7187615.
Further
Similar companies
- Mobile Hamar AS index 19, rank 2,542 · compare
- Nardo og Melhus Bilskade AS index 17, rank 2,578 · compare
- Mobile Alnabru AS index 17, rank 2,583 · compare
- Modern Design Drift AS index 16, rank 2,599 · compare
- Bilservice Egersund AS index 16, rank 2,600 · compare