Spring Methods AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2024
54of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 57 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 2,213 of 5,110 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 2,705 of 6,306 · Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 91 and resilience 26 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. Methodology
Against the sector
Spring Methods AS is 3 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024.
Median score 51 among 5,108 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024: operating margin 51.9% (median 11.8%) and equity ratio 10.5% (median 45.0%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue fell by 26 % from 2023 to 2025, to 2.4 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 52.4% in 2023 to 38.5% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 8.1% in 2023 to 41.0% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Worth a closer look
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −50.3% (median −7.0%); Current ratio 1.08 (median 1.66).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.3% of the debt in 2024. The policy rate averaged 4.50 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 6.4%. Based on the 9 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 91 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 15 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 22 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 34 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 49 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 55 (average over 2 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 51.9% | 11.8% |
| Profit margin | 51.9% | 12.6% |
| Return on assets | 75.0% | 18.6% |
| Equity ratio | 10.5% | 45.0% |
| Debt-to-equity | 8.54 | 1.06 |
| Current ratio | 1.08 | 1.66 |
| Revenue growth | −9.3% | 7.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 54, Spring Methods AS does better than 57% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (5,110 companies) in 2024.
Score 2023–2025
- Spring Methods AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
43 days | 54 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−50.3% | −7.0% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
82.4% | 53.6% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
286.1 | 29.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.3% | 0.4% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.1% | 0.0% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −1.5 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
What the numbers say
Spring Methods AS had an operating margin of 51.9% and an equity ratio of 10.5% in 2024, and ranks 2,705 of 6,306 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning.
No large changes in the key figures from 2023 to 2024.
This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 1 MNOK and 19 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.4 | 17 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 17.4 | 19 MNOK |
| P/B | 4.1 | 1 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 28 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 17 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −2 MNOK |
| Equity value | 19 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Business & Consumer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Spring Methods AS?
The operating margin was 51.9% in 2024, against a median of 11.8% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 75.0%.
How solid is Spring Methods AS?
The equity ratio was 10.5% in 2024 (median 45.0%). Debt-to-equity was 8.54 (median 1.06).
What is the liquidity of Spring Methods AS like?
The current ratio was 1.08 in 2024 (median 1.66).
How does Spring Methods AS compare in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning?
Spring Methods AS ranks 2,705 of 6,306 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning for 2024. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 2,213 of 5,110. Revenue changed by −9.3% from the year before.
Group structure · 2025
2 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Truls Johansen AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Truls Johansen AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (2 companies) 2 of 2 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
-
Truls Johansen AS
- Spring Methods AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 921405979
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (70.200)
- Purpose
- Strategisk rådgivning for offentlig og privat sektor basert på design- og innovasjonsmetodikk.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 1.0 MNOK (2024).
- Founded
- 4 September 2018 8 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Mellomveien 4A, 7067 TRONDHEIM
- Municipality
- Trondheim rank 3 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 15 September 2018
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 3 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Truls Johansen AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
- Truls Johansen AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 56 | 54 | 56 | |
| Rank | 2,345 | 2,705 | 2,523 | |
| Operating margin | 52.4% | 51.9% | 38.5% | |
| Return on assets | 74.6% | 75.0% | 64.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 8.1% | 10.5% | 41.0% | |
| Current ratio | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.64 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −9.3% | −18.6% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.2 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.7 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 1.7 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.4 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 1.3 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 2.3 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 2.2 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 2.1 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 2.1 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 6272307.
Further
Similar companies
- Startuptrd AS index 54, rank 2,702 · compare
- Sanna Salgscoaching AS index 54, rank 2,703 · compare
- Dennis Røller AS index 54, rank 2,704 · compare
- Sandnesadvokatene AS index 54, rank 2,707 · compare
- Absolutt Økonomi AS index 54, rank 2,709 · compare