Conditionall AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
59of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 67 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 540 of 1,642 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,857 of 5,554 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 44 and resilience 86 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Conditionall AS is 8 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,642 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 6.5% (median 5.6%) and equity ratio 73.2% (median 33.1%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 12 MNOK | 19 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 6.5% | 5.6% |
| Profit margin | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Return on assets | 5.8% | 14.0% |
| Equity ratio | 73.2% | 33.1% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.37 | 1.77 |
| Current ratio | 4.28 | 1.43 |
| Revenue growth | 9.3% | 8.6% |
| Revenue per employee | 2.45 MNOK | 1.72 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 59, Conditionall AS does better than 67% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,642 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Conditionall AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Conditionall AS has a score of 59 for 2025, rank 1,857 of 5,554 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 96 against peers, current ratio 4.28 against a median of 1.43. Solidity: percentile 93 against peers, equity ratio 73.2% against a median of 33.1%.
No area is clearly below its peers.
Worth a closer look
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 2.2 percentage points weaker than for comparable companies: the company −1.5, the industry +0.7 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Conditionall AS fell by 1.5 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 2.2 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Conditionall AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 18% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8.0% | 4.9% | −3.6 percentage points | −0.5 percentage points | −3.2 percentage points |
| 2025 | 6.5% | 5.6% | −1.5 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points | −2.2 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Conditionall AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities rose 8.1% in 2025; the operating margin of Conditionall AS fell 1.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities, annual average | 99.0 | 108.8 | 127.9 | 146.4 | 158.3 | 155.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +9.8% | +9.9% | +17.5% | +14.5% | +8.1% | −1.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 11.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: advertising and market research (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: advertising and market research rose 3.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Conditionall AS fell 1.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: advertising and market research, annual average | 99.4 | 113.5 | 108.3 | 106.9 | 110.7 | 126.1 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +35.1% | +14.2% | −4.6% | −1.3% | +3.6% | +13.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 11.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities rose 6.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Conditionall AS fell 1.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: other professional and technical activities, annual average | 98.3 | 121.6 | 139.4 | 131.0 | 139.1 | 158.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +29.9% | +23.7% | +14.6% | −6.0% | +6.2% | +13.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 11.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: architects and engineering (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: architects and engineering rose 3.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Conditionall AS fell 1.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: architects and engineering, annual average | 100.0 | 103.6 | 107.5 | 111.2 | 114.7 | 119.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.2% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +4.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 11.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Oil price (export price of crude oil) (kr per fat)
Oil price (export price of crude oil) fell 17.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Conditionall AS fell 1.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil price (export price of crude oil), annual average | 609 | 979 | 877 | 859 | 708 | 881 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +61.1% | +60.8% | −10.5% | −2.0% | −17.6% | +24.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 11.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | – |
Source: SSB (08799, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Conditionall AS fell 1.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 11.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Conditionall AS fell 1.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 11.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: architects and engineering (indeks)
Wage index: architects and engineering rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Conditionall AS fell 1.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: architects and engineering, annual average | 90.5 | 90.9 | 96.0 | 100.9 | 105.6 | 109.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +7.4% | +0.5% | +5.6% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 11.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Conditionall AS had an operating margin of 6.5% and an equity ratio of 73.2% in 2025, and ranks 1,857 of 5,554 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
No large changes in the key figures from 2024 to 2025.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 7 MNOK and 15 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.9 | 7 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.3 | 13 MNOK |
| P/B | 2.3 | 15 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 14 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 9 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −4 MNOK |
| Equity value | 13 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −45% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (71.1): Engineering/Construction.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 4.1% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 44 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 93 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 96 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 45 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 69 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 63 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Conditionall AS?
The operating margin was 6.5% in 2025, against a median of 5.6% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 5.8%.
How solid is Conditionall AS?
The equity ratio was 73.2% in 2025 (median 33.1%). Debt-to-equity was 0.37 (median 1.77).
What is the liquidity of Conditionall AS like?
The current ratio was 4.28 in 2025 (median 1.43).
How does Conditionall AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
Conditionall AS ranks 1,857 of 5,554 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 540 of 1,642. Revenue changed by 9.3% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Femac AS |  Lion |
13 MNOK | 6.7% | 50 |
| Norrde Engineering AS |  Beaver |
12 MNOK | −0.6% | 33 |
| Ecoguard Norge AS | Beaver |
12 MNOK | −165.1% | 21 |
| Conditionall AS (this company) |  Elephant |
12 MNOK | 6.5% | 59 |
| Enerconsult AS | Lion |
12 MNOK | 9.2% | 60 |
| Minoko Design AS | Beaver |
12 MNOK | −5.3% | 24 |
| Tangen Engineering AS |  Cheetah |
12 MNOK | 8.1% | 51 |
| Seelution AS | Cheetah |
12 MNOK | 13.9% | 51 |
| Excess Engineering AS | Beaver |
12 MNOK | −77.9% | 25 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 923440437
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (71.129)
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 5 registered 10 August 2026
- Founded
- 2 September 2019 7 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.04 MNOK
- Business address
- Litleåsvegen 61, 5132 NYBORG (BERGEN)
- Municipality
- Bergen rank 8 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- Website
- conditionall.com
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 6
- Largest owner
- 18.0% · top three 54.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Rørdal Holding AS · 18.0%
- Reidar Eikeland AS · 18.0%
- Aarvaker AS · 18.0%
- Løkkås AS · 18.0%
- Alat AS · 18.0%
- Alin Invest AS · 10.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 70 | 58 | 59 | |
| Rank | 1,025 | 1,874 | 1,857 | |
| Operating margin | 11.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | |
| Return on assets | 11.0% | 6.6% | 5.8% | |
| Equity ratio | 69.4% | 69.8% | 73.2% | |
| Current ratio | 3.56 | 3.92 | 4.28 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 3.4% | 9.3% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10.9 MNOK | 11.2 MNOK | 12.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.3 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.9 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.9 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.5 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Total assets | 13.0 MNOK | 14.1 MNOK | 14.2 MNOK |
| Current assets | 4.7 MNOK | 6.7 MNOK | 8.7 MNOK |
| Equity | 9.0 MNOK | 9.8 MNOK | 10.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 4.0 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK | 5.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 4.0 MNOK | 4.3 MNOK | 3.8 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.3 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 7023896.
Further
Similar companies
- Ruukki Building Components AS index 59, rank 1,846 · compare
- Arkoconsult AS index 59, rank 1,849 · compare
- TUR.Digital AS index 59, rank 1,853 · compare
- Zolve AS index 59, rank 1,858 · compare
- Lås og Kontrollservice AS index 59, rank 1,861 · compare