AMON MARITIME AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
36of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 25 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 1,530 of 2,035 · Sjøfart
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 12 and solidity 73 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
AMON MARITIME AS is 14 points below the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 1,468 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −125.9% (median 8.4%) and equity ratio 90.3% (median 51.2%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 5 MNOK | 5 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −125.9% | 8.4% |
| Profit margin | −128.5% | 9.2% |
| Return on assets | −10.1% | 3.4% |
| Equity ratio | 90.3% | 51.2% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.11 | 0.67 |
| Current ratio | 0.55 | 1.77 |
| Revenue growth | −7.3% | 1.2% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.64 MNOK | 1.35 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 36, AMON MARITIME AS does better than 25% of small companies in the same sector (1,475 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- AMON MARITIME AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
AMON MARITIME AS has a score of 36 for 2025, rank 1,530 of 2,035 in the sector.
Strongest: Solidity: percentile 73 against peers, equity ratio 90.3% against a median of 51.2%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 12 against peers, operating margin −125.9% against a median of 8.4%. Liquidity: percentile 22 against peers, current ratio 0.55 against a median of 1.77.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.8 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.55 (median 1.77).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −128.5% (median 9.2%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −125.9% (median 8.4%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
AMON MARITIME AS had an operating margin of −125.9% and an equity ratio of 90.3% in 2025, and ranks 1,530 of 2,035 in Sjøfart.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from −58.9% to −125.9% and the equity ratio rose from 63.9% to 90.3%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 49 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 49 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.8 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.55 (median 1.77).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −128.5% (median 9.2%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −125.9% (median 8.4%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 5.1% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
- watch Extreme margin: check the figures
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 6.1%. Based on the 7 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 12 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 73 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 22 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 32 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 40 | weight 15% |
Durability: 47 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is AMON MARITIME AS?
The operating margin was −125.9% in 2025, against a median of 8.4% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −10.1%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is AMON MARITIME AS?
The equity ratio was 90.3% in 2025 (median 51.2%). Debt-to-equity was 0.11 (median 0.67).
What is the liquidity of AMON MARITIME AS like?
The current ratio was 0.55 in 2025 (median 1.77). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does AMON MARITIME AS compare in Sjøfart?
AMON MARITIME AS ranks 1,530 of 2,035 in Sjøfart for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 1,102 of 1,475. Revenue changed by −7.3% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 923745181
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Sjøfart (50.203)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 7 registered 10 April 2026
- Founded
- 20 September 2019 7 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.24 MNOK
- Business address
- Storgata 27, 3210 SANDEFJORD
- Municipality
- Sandefjord rank 2–6 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- André Roaldsen Skadberg Risholm
- Chair of the board
- Mads Helge Haavardsholm
- Board member
- Steinar Frøyen Kostøl
- Board member
- Endre Tarald Glastad
- Board member
- André Roaldsen Skadberg Risholm
- Board member
- Peder Nicolai Jarlsby
- Auditor
- PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS AS
- Accountant
- NJORD BUSINESS SERVICES AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 67 | 38 | 36 | |
| Rank | 336 | 1,406 | 1,530 | |
| Operating margin | 45.4% | −58.9% | −125.9% | |
| Return on assets | 26.8% | −11.7% | −10.1% | |
| Equity ratio | 54.6% | 63.9% | 90.3% | |
| Current ratio | 5.49 | 5.29 | 0.55 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −70.3% | −7.3% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 16.4 MNOK | 4.9 MNOK | 4.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 7.4 MNOK | −2.9 MNOK | −5.7 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 7.1 MNOK | −2.7 MNOK | −5.8 MNOK |
| Net profit | 6.0 MNOK | −2.7 MNOK | −5.8 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.4 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Total assets | 28.0 MNOK | 19.7 MNOK | 54.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 18.1 MNOK | 8.6 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK |
| Equity | 15.3 MNOK | 12.6 MNOK | 49.3 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 4.2 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | −2.5 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 12.7 MNOK | 7.1 MNOK | 5.3 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 3.3 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 7098315.
Further
Similar companies
- SOLSEIS PARTNERS AS index 36, rank 1,527 · compare
- EIKERN TURISTTRAFIKK AS index 36, rank 1,528 · compare
- THE FJORDS MANAGEMENT AS index 36, rank 1,529 · compare
- MØRE LOGISTIC AS index 36, rank 1,531 · compare
- TIDEWATER NORGE AS index 36, rank 1,532 · compare