Gressvik Properties AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin −14.2% Weaker than the industry Industry: 47.7%
- Returns · return on assets 6.0% Weaker than the industry Industry: 7.8%
- Solidity · equity ratio 22.5% About like the industry Industry: 27.9%
- Liquidity · current ratio 1.59 About like the industry Industry: 1.40
- Growth · revenue growth 2.1% Weaker than the industry Industry: 3.3%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
36of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 20 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 19,034 of 23,907 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 24,115 of 30,137 · Eiendom
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 23 and resilience 35 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Gressvik Properties AS is 14 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 23,901 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −14.2% (median 47.7%) and equity ratio 22.5% (median 27.9%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose from −0.1 MNOK in 2023 to 2.8 MNOK in 2025. The operating margin rose from −24.9% in 2024 to −14.2% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 26.8% in 2023 to 22.5% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | −0.1 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −4.2 MNOK | −0.7 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | −15.8 MNOK | −14.0 MNOK | −3.7 MNOK |
| Total assets | 438.1 MNOK | 403.3 MNOK | 345.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 117.4 MNOK | 103.4 MNOK | 77.7 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 320.7 MNOK | 300.0 MNOK | 267.6 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 925208469
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Eiendom (68.200)
- Purpose
- Kjøp, salg, utleie og utvikling av fast eiendom. Investeringer i andre selskaper.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 1.0 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 9 June 2020 6 years in operation
- Share capital
- 3.55 MNOK
- Business address
- Hjalmar Bjørges vei 105, 1604 FREDRIKSTAD
- Municipality
- Fredrikstad rank 11 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- LEI
- 984500077F5FF8985937 renews 22 October 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Gressvik Properties AS has a score of 36 for 2025, rank 24,115 of 30,137 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 56 against peers, revenue growth 2.1% against a median of 3.3%.
Weakest: Consistency: percentile 14 against peers. Profitability: percentile 23 against peers, operating margin −14.2% against a median of 47.7%.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) 0.0 (median 1.8); financial costs as a share of debt 8.9% (median 5.0%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −114.7% (median 24.4%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −14.2% (median 47.7%).
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) 0.0 (median 1.8); Financial costs as a share of debt 8.9% (median 5.0%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −114.7% (median 24.4%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −14.2% (median 47.7%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 1,117 days (median 40 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 8.9% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 23 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 41 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 54 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 56 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 14 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 31 (average over 2 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −14.2% | 47.7% |
| Profit margin | −114.7% | 24.4% |
| Return on assets | 6.0% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | 22.5% | 27.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 3.45 | 2.10 |
| Current ratio | 1.59 | 1.40 |
| Revenue growth | 2.1% | 3.3% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 36, Gressvik Properties AS does better than 20% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (23,907 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Gressvik Properties AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
1,117 days | 40 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−147.3% | −12.4% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
57.6% | 54.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
0.0 | 1.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
8.9% | 5.0% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
95.3% | 87.8% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −4.1 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 23.8 MNOK, 18.4 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Gressvik Properties AS rose by 10.8 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 10.0 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | −14.2% | 47.7% | +10.8 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points | +10.0 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Gressvik Properties AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))
House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Gressvik Properties AS rose 10.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House prices (existing homes), annual average | 134.5 | 141.6 | 140.8 | 144.6 | 152.5 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.5% | +5.2% | −0.5% | +2.7% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −24.9% | −14.2% | – |
Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Gressvik Properties AS rose 10.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −24.9% | −14.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))
Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Gressvik Properties AS rose 10.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average | 124.2 | 135.1 | 141.1 | 146.4 | 152.7 | 158.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +8.8% | +4.4% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +3.7% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −24.9% | −14.2% | – |
Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Gressvik Properties AS rose 10.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −24.9% | −14.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: real estate (indeks)
Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Gressvik Properties AS rose 10.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: real estate, annual average | 91.7 | 94.3 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 108.5 | 111.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −24.9% | −14.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Gressvik Properties AS had an operating margin of −14.2% and an equity ratio of 22.5% in 2025, and ranks 24,115 of 30,137 in Eiendom.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −24.9% to −14.2%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 33 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.5 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 19.2 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 0.7 | 33 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Gressvik Properties AS?
The operating margin was −14.2% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 6.0%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Gressvik Properties AS?
The equity ratio was 22.5% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 3.45 (median 2.10).
What is the liquidity of Gressvik Properties AS like?
The current ratio was 1.59 in 2025 (median 1.40).
How does Gressvik Properties AS compare in Eiendom?
Gressvik Properties AS ranks 24,115 of 30,137 in Eiendom for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 19,034 of 23,907. Revenue changed by 2.1% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ulv AS |  Lion |
3 MNOK | 73.1% | 71 |
| A. Høvik Invest AS | Lion |
3 MNOK | 58.6% | 54 |
| Gttk Eiendom AS |  Cheetah |
3 MNOK | 59.0% | 51 |
| Janca Eiendom AS | Lion |
3 MNOK | 63.1% | 67 |
| Gressvik Properties AS (this company) |  Beaver |
3 MNOK | −14.2% | 36 |
| Sørumsand Handelspark AS | Cheetah |
3 MNOK | 68.5% | 31 |
| Berge-Eiendom AS | Beaver |
3 MNOK | 46.2% | 43 |
| Industriveien 39E AS | Lion |
3 MNOK | 73.1% | 75 |
| Levre Eiendom AS | Cheetah |
3 MNOK | 78.8% | 57 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
9 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Gressvik Properties AS.
Gressvik Properties AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Eiendom (8 companies), Transport og lagring (1 company) 9 of 9 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 3 companies: Kiær Invest Eiendom II AS, Gressvik Properties AS, Gressvik Eiendom AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company left: Øraveien 23 Næringspark AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Gressvik Properties AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 4 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 31 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2
- Largest owner
- 50.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 50%
- Bjerknes Eiendom AS · 50.0%
- A.T.M Invest AS · 50.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Majority owner of: Båtlageret AS (100%), Stabburveien 24 Fredrikstad AS (100%), Østkilen Utvikling AS (100%), Onsøy Båthavn AS (100%), Kiær Invest Eiendom II AS (100%), Gressvik Eiendom AS (100%), Sonnino Eiendom AS (100%), Fredrikstad Marina AS (100%)
The portfolio: 8 of the companies it owns shares in have accounts with us, 8 of them as majority owner. The average index is 45. 0 have negative equity and 2 made a loss in the latest year.
Holds shares in: Gressvik Eiendom AS (100%), Stabburveien 24 Fredrikstad AS (100%), Kiær Invest Eiendom II AS (100%), Sonnino Eiendom AS (100%), Båtlageret AS (100%), Fredrikstad Marina AS (100%), Østkilen Utvikling AS (100%), Onsøy Båthavn AS (100%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | 27 | 36 | |
| Rank | – | 25,814 | 24,115 | |
| Operating margin | – | −24.9% | −14.2% | |
| Return on assets | 3.5% | 4.9% | 6.0% | |
| Equity ratio | 26.8% | 25.6% | 22.5% | |
| Current ratio | 0.93 | 0.49 | 1.59 | |
| Revenue growth | – | – | 2.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | −0.1 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −4.2 MNOK | −0.7 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −15.5 MNOK | −14.4 MNOK | −3.2 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.3 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Net profit | −15.8 MNOK | −14.0 MNOK | −3.7 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 30.8 MNOK | 34.4 MNOK | 23.8 MNOK |
| Total assets | 438.1 MNOK | 403.3 MNOK | 345.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 22.3 MNOK | 8.3 MNOK | 20.2 MNOK |
| Equity | 117.4 MNOK | 103.4 MNOK | 77.7 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −11.9 MNOK | −25.9 MNOK | −31.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 320.7 MNOK | 300.0 MNOK | 267.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 24.1 MNOK | 17.0 MNOK | 12.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6833320.
Further
Similar companies
- Wano Invest AS index 36, rank 24,111 · compare
- Forsøkslia AS index 36, rank 24,112 · compare
- Blålys Eiendom AS index 36, rank 24,113 · compare
- Utleie og Eiendom AS index 36, rank 24,114 · compare
- GRANNESGT. 25 AS index 36, rank 24,116 · compare