Jotunheimen AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
22of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 11 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 838 of 941 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,318 of 1,469 · Kultur og fritid
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 10 and solidity 25 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Jotunheimen AS is 28 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 938 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −12.0% (median 4.1%) and equity ratio 13.8% (median 33.7%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 6 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −12.0% | 4.1% |
| Profit margin | −14.7% | 3.2% |
| Return on assets | −34.1% | 7.6% |
| Equity ratio | 13.8% | 33.7% |
| Debt-to-equity | 6.26 | 1.21 |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 1.43 |
| Revenue growth | −4.2% | 4.3% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.49 MNOK | 0.33 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 22, Jotunheimen AS does better than 11% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (941 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Jotunheimen AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Jotunheimen AS has a score of 22 for 2025, rank 1,318 of 1,469 in the sector.
Strongest: Consistency: percentile 36 against peers.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 10 against peers, operating margin −12.0% against a median of 4.1%. Liquidity: percentile 19 against peers, current ratio 0.63 against a median of 1.43.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.6 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.63 (median 1.43).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −14.7% (median 3.2%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −12.0% (median 4.1%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Jotunheimen AS fell by 9.3 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.6 points. So the company did 9.8 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Jotunheimen AS moved the same way as comparable companies 0 times. About 3% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −2.7% | 3.5% | +14.1 percentage points | −0.1 percentage points | +14.2 percentage points |
| 2025 | −12.0% | 4.1% | −9.3 percentage points | +0.6 percentage points | −9.8 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Jotunheimen AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Jotunheimen AS fell 9.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 102.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −16.8% | −2.7% | −12.0% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Jotunheimen AS fell 9.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −16.8% | −2.7% | −12.0% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: sports and recreation (indeks)
Wage index: sports and recreation rose 6.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Jotunheimen AS fell 9.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: sports and recreation, annual average | 84.2 | 89.2 | 94.0 | 98.8 | 105.5 | 112.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +2.0% | +6.0% | +5.4% | +5.2% | +6.7% | +6.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −16.8% | −2.7% | −12.0% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Jotunheimen AS had an operating margin of −12.0% and an equity ratio of 13.8% in 2025, and ranks 1,318 of 1,469 in Kultur og fritid.
From 2024 to 2025: the equity ratio rose from −24.8% to 13.8% and the operating margin fell from −2.7% to −12.0%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 0 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 21.1 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 19.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.3 | 0 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered by 51% for an unlisted company: 20% for lack of marketability and 38% for size (a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity).
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.6 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.63 (median 1.43).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −14.7% (median 3.2%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −12.0% (median 4.1%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 9.0% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of −5.4%. Based on the 7 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 10 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 25 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 19 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 27 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 36 | weight 15% |
Durability: 17 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Jotunheimen AS?
The operating margin was −12.0% in 2025, against a median of 4.1% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −34.1%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Jotunheimen AS?
The equity ratio was 13.8% in 2025 (median 33.7%). Debt-to-equity was 6.26 (median 1.21).
What is the liquidity of Jotunheimen AS like?
The current ratio was 0.63 in 2025 (median 1.43). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Jotunheimen AS compare in Kultur og fritid?
Jotunheimen AS ranks 1,318 of 1,469 in Kultur og fritid for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 838 of 941. Revenue changed by −4.2% from the year before.
Group structure · 2025
4 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Team Midgard AS.
Team Midgard AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Kultur og fritid (1 company), Informasjon og kommunikasjon (1 company) 2 of 4 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 12 in all. Trondheim 12 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Loss
- 2 companies: Jotunheimen AS, Jotunheimen Systems AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Team Midgard AS
-
Jotunheimen AS you are here
-
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 925689092
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Kultur og fritid (93.190)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 12 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 25 August 2020 6 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.05 MNOK
- Business address
- Kjøpmannsgata 63, 7011 TRONDHEIM
- Municipality
- Trondheim rank 3 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 341 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 64.9% · top three 78.4%
- Split
- companies 85% · private persons 15% · foreign 1%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 77%
- Owners over 60
- 10% of the shares held by persons (median age 39)
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Team Midgard AS (65%)
Ultimate owner: Team Midgard AS
- Team Midgard AS · 64.9%
- Klein Invest AS · 11.9%
- Metizport AS · 1.7%
- TP Solutions AS · 1.5%
- Turbobit AS · 0.5%
- Cap Holding AS · 0.4%
- Aoly Holding AS · 0.4%
- Kvithuset Holding AS · 0.3%
- Xiphias Invest NUF · 0.3%
- Bartebyen Holding AS · 0.3%
- 294 private persons · 14.7%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Majority owner of: Jotunheimen Systems AS (100%), Jotunheimen Trondheim AS (100%)
Holds shares in: Jotunheimen Systems AS (100%), Jotunheimen Trondheim AS (100%)
The owners' shares do not add up to the company's total number of shares in the source.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 5 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 6 | 24 | 22 | |
| Rank | 1,340 | 1,283 | 1,318 | |
| Operating margin | −16.8% | −2.7% | −12.0% | |
| Return on assets | −27.1% | −4.1% | −34.1% | |
| Equity ratio | −13.2% | −24.8% | 13.8% | |
| Current ratio | 0.37 | 0.75 | 0.63 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 21.6% | −4.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 5.1 MNOK | 6.2 MNOK | 5.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.9 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.7 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −1.1 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | −0.9 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.1 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | −0.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Total assets | 3.1 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.4 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Equity | −0.4 MNOK | −0.7 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −4.7 MNOK | −5.0 MNOK | −5.9 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 3.5 MNOK | 3.8 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.0 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 5 November 2026, accounts id 6956810.
Further
Similar companies
- Molvaer Music AS index 22, rank 1,314 · compare
- Eir Trening AS index 22, rank 1,316 · compare
- House of Nerds Vulkan AS index 22, rank 1,317 · compare
- Trine Berge AS index 22, rank 1,320 · compare
- Sogn Skisenter AS index 21, rank 1,325 · compare