Computatrum AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2024
66of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 80 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 816 of 4,045 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,162 of 6,381 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 74 and resilience 82 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. Methodology
Against the sector
Computatrum AS is 15 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024.
Median score 51 among 4,045 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024: operating margin 39.5% (median 6.2%) and equity ratio 80.4% (median 38.9%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 39.5% | 6.2% |
| Profit margin | 48.5% | 6.6% |
| Return on assets | 24.5% | 12.1% |
| Equity ratio | 80.4% | 38.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.24 | 1.13 |
| Current ratio | 3.68 | 1.54 |
| Revenue growth | −3.1% | 9.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 66, Computatrum AS does better than 80% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (4,045 companies) in 2024.
Score 2023–2025
- Computatrum AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
coming | – | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
coming | – | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−12.3% | −9.7% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
83.7% | 56.2% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
– | 10.5 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
−28.2% | 0.7% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
3.3% | 0.0% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.3 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Receivable days and inventory are shown once older accounts have been read again from the raw data. This happens by itself, without new calls to the Brønnøysund Register Centre.
What the numbers say
Computatrum AS had an operating margin of 39.5% and an equity ratio of 80.4% in 2024, and ranks 1,162 of 6,381 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2023 to 2024: the operating margin fell from 46.3% to 39.5%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 7 MNOK and 12 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | 10 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | 12 MNOK |
| P/B | 3.6 | 7 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 15 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 9 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −2 MNOK |
| Equity value | 12 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- positive
Upper quartile on profitability, solidity and liquidity. What sets this company apart from the rest of the sector?
Based on: Operating margin 39.5% (median 6.2%); Equity ratio 80.4% (median 38.9%); Current ratio 3.68 (median 1.54).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were −28.2% of the debt in 2024. The policy rate averaged 4.50 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 4.6%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 74 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 87 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 82 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 31 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 73 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 75 (average over 2 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Computatrum AS?
The operating margin was 39.5% in 2024, against a median of 6.2% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 24.5%.
How solid is Computatrum AS?
The equity ratio was 80.4% in 2024 (median 38.9%). Debt-to-equity was 0.24 (median 1.13).
What is the liquidity of Computatrum AS like?
The current ratio was 3.68 in 2024 (median 1.54).
How does Computatrum AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Computatrum AS ranks 1,162 of 6,381 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2024. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 816 of 4,045. Revenue changed by −3.1% from the year before.
Group structure · 2025
3 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Emoneo AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Emoneo AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (2 companies), Eiendom (1 company) 3 of 3 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 1 company: Habitationi AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Emoneo AS
- Computatrum AS you are here
- Habitationi AS
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 925896357
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.200)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 22 October 2020 6 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Grønliveien 3B, 1056 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 3 November 2020
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 4 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Emoneo AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner Emoneo AS (holds 100%) made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Emoneo AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 84 | 66 | 71 | |
| Rank | 310 | 1,162 | 731 | |
| Operating margin | 46.3% | 39.5% | 37.8% | |
| Return on assets | 41.9% | 24.5% | 22.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 78.5% | 80.4% | 77.7% | |
| Current ratio | 2.29 | 3.68 | 3.73 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −3.1% | 19.5% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.4 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.1 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 1.1 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.9 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 2.7 MNOK | 3.8 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.2 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK | 4.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 2.2 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 2.1 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.6 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.5 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6046893.
Further
Similar companies
- Theta Development AS index 66, rank 1,157 · compare
- MINT CLOUD & Infrastructure AS index 66, rank 1,158 · compare
- Pathfinder Consult AS index 66, rank 1,160 · compare
- Abexworks Services AS index 66, rank 1,161 · compare
- Progfag AS index 66, rank 1,164 · compare