Inline Code AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2024
9of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 2 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 4,504 of 4,590 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 6,890 of 6,996 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 10 and resilience 4 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. Methodology
Against the sector
Inline Code AS is 42 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024.
Median score 51 among 4,589 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024: operating margin −15.8% (median 6.5%) and equity ratio −84.1% (median 40.0%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −15.8% | 6.5% |
| Profit margin | −15.8% | 6.7% |
| Return on assets | −73.6% | 12.1% |
| Equity ratio | −84.1% | 40.0% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.09 |
| Current ratio | 0.54 | 1.55 |
| Revenue growth | −33.4% | 8.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 9, Inline Code AS does better than 2% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (4,590 companies) in 2024.
Score 2023–2025
- Inline Code AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
78 days | 49 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−18.3% | −9.2% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
0.8% | 55.6% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
– | 9.6 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
– | 0.7% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.0% | 0.0% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.4 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
What the numbers say
Inline Code AS had an operating margin of −15.8% and an equity ratio of −84.1% in 2024, and ranks 6,890 of 6,996 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2023 to 2024: the equity ratio fell from −10.0% to −84.1% and the operating margin fell from −2.3% to −15.8%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.
Three simple methods
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.6 | not meaningful |
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −84.1% (median 40.0%).
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.8 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.54 (median 1.55).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −15.8% (median 6.7%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −15.8% (median 6.5%).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −18.3% (median −9.2%); Current ratio 0.54 (median 1.55).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 10 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 10 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 14 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 8 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 12 (average over 2 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Inline Code AS?
The operating margin was −15.8% in 2024, against a median of 6.5% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −73.6%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Inline Code AS?
The equity ratio was −84.1% in 2024 (median 40.0%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of Inline Code AS like?
The current ratio was 0.54 in 2024 (median 1.55). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Inline Code AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Inline Code AS ranks 6,890 of 6,996 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2024. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 4,504 of 4,590. Revenue changed by −33.4% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 926096516
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.100)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 19 November 2020 5 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Ørakerstien 18, 0284 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 3 December 2020
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- LEI
- 984500F73SDBF95C4D88 renews 9 April 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 4 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 31 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Holds shares in: Hexagon Composites ASA (0%), Aker Solutions ASA (0%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 16 | 9 | 43 | |
| Rank | 5,944 | 6,890 | 4,730 | |
| Operating margin | −2.3% | −15.8% | 9.9% | |
| Return on assets | −15.2% | −73.6% | 55.0% | |
| Equity ratio | −10.0% | −84.1% | −86.6% | |
| Current ratio | 0.91 | 0.54 | 0.54 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −33.4% | −29.0% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.1 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.1 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Tax expense | – | – | – |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | – | – | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.5 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.5 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.0 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −0.1 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.5 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.5 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 5675047.
Further
Similar companies
- Ecit Veny AS index 9, rank 6,885 · compare
- Entar AS index 9, rank 6,889 · compare
- Programmering AS index 9, rank 6,891 · compare
- Megafon Forlag AS index 9, rank 6,892 · compare
- Rabagast Film AS index 8, rank 6,893 · compare