Brumar AS

Org. no. 926410458 · Gjemnes · AS

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

Key facts

Employees – Not registered in the Central Coordinating Register
Operating revenue · 2024 1.1 MNOK Micro
Net profit · 2024 0.0 MNOK
Equity · 2024 −0.6 MNOK
Founded 2021 5 years in operation
Sector Eiendom 68.110
Quick check · fiscal year 2024

Is the company run well?

Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.

  • Profitability · operating margin 58.3% Better than the industry Industry: 46.9%
  • Returns · return on assets 6.2% About like the industry Industry: 7.5%
  • Solidity · equity ratio −5.5% Weaker than the industry Industry: 27.4%
  • Liquidity · current ratio 1.88 About like the industry Industry: 1.37
  • Growth · revenue growth −59.5% Weaker than the industry Industry: 4.9%

The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology

Score · fiscal year 2024

38of 100

How to read this: the company is ahead of 24 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?

Rank in the Morning class Micro: 17,179 of 22,743 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 21,712 of 28,599 · Eiendom

Profile

Cheetah · Sprinter

High profitability, lower resilience

Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 53 and resilience 18 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. Methodology

Against the sector

Brumar AS is 12 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024.

Median score 50 among 22,740 companies.

Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024: operating margin 58.3% (median 46.9%) and equity ratio −5.5% (median 27.4%).

Source: Register of Company Accounts and Central Coordinating RegisterFetched 9 November 2026Report an issue
Development

How it has gone · 2023–2025

Revenue rose by 40 % from 2023 to 2025, to 3.9 MNOK. The operating margin rose from 35.9% in 2023 to 54.0% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from −6.5% in 2023 to 4.6% in 2025.

Score · 2025 54 +21 points since 2023 (better)
Operating revenue · 2025 3.9 MNOK +40% since 2023 (better)
Net profit · 2025 1.3 MNOK +181% since 2023 (better)
Operating margin · 2025 54.0% +18.2 pp since 2023 (better)
Equity ratio · 2025 4.6% +11.1 pp since 2023 (better)
Current ratio · 2025 3.05 +2.38 since 2023 (better)

Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year

Accounts in short

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue2.8 MNOK1.1 MNOK3.9 MNOK
Operating profit1.0 MNOK0.7 MNOK2.1 MNOK
Net profit0.5 MNOK0.0 MNOK1.3 MNOK
Total assets8.6 MNOK10.7 MNOK13.5 MNOK
Equity−0.6 MNOK−0.6 MNOK0.6 MNOK
Total liabilities9.2 MNOK11.3 MNOK12.9 MNOK

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year

From the Central Coordinating Register

Org. no.
926410458
Legal form
AS
Sector
Eiendom (68.110)
Purpose
Kjøp og salg av eiendom, utleie og drift av eiendom. Utleie av utstyr og arbeidskraft. Investering i verdipapir. Konsulenttjenester knyttet til ledelse og administrasjon.
Morning company class
Micro
Employees
0–4 (not registered)
Founded
1 January 2021 5 years in operation
Share capital
0.53 MNOK
Business address
Batnfjordsvegen 105, 6631 BATNFJORDSØRA (GJEMNES)
Municipality
Gjemnes rank 4 of 39 in KOSTRA group 4
Audit
Audit opted out from 19 January 2021
Latest accounts filed
2025
VAT registered
Yes
Former names
Nfh 210106 AS until 2021
The company's business municipality, Gjemnes. The map shows the municipality, not the address. Map source: Kartverket (CC BY 4.0).

Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre

Indications · 2024

Worth a closer look

  • critical

    Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?

    Based on: Equity ratio −5.5% (median 27.4%).

  • critical

    The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?

    Based on: Interest coverage (times) 1.0 (median 1.6); Financial costs as a share of debt 6.1% (median 5.2%).

  • watch

    The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?

    Based on: Profit margin −2.5% (median 21.7%).

  • watch

    Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?

    Based on: Receivable days 352 days (median 44 days).

Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.

Financial costs were 6.1% of the debt in 2024. The policy rate averaged 4.50 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.

See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector

Data quality

  • critical Negative equity
Stress test · 2022

Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year

We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.

The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology

Components · 2024

What the score is made of

Profitability53 weight 40%
Solidity0 weight 20%
Liquidity59 weight 5%
Growth43 weight 25%
Consistency32 weight 10%

Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?

Durability: 35 (average over 2 years)

Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.

Key figures · 2024

The numbers behind the score

The numbers behind the score · 2024
MeasureCompanyMedianAhead of
Operating revenue1 MNOK2 MNOK
Operating margin 58.3% 46.9% 64 %
Profit margin −2.5% 21.7% shown, not part of the index
Return on assets 6.2% 7.5% 41 %
Equity ratio −5.5% 27.4% 6 %
Debt-to-equity – 2.14 not compared
Current ratio 1.88 1.37 59 %
Revenue growth −59.5% 4.9% 3 %

The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.

With an index of 38, Brumar AS does better than 24% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (22,743 companies) in 2024.

Over time

Score 2023–2025

CompanyMedian0255075100202320242025
  • Brumar AS
  • Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt · 2024

Working capital and debt

Working capital and debt · 2024
MeasureCompanyMedianHigher than
Working capital
Receivable days
All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue.
352 days 44 days 84 %
Inventory and other current assets, days
Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue.
57 days 0 days 87 %
Net working capital to revenue
Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations.
−26.1% −12.9% 37 %
Cash share of current assets
How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash.
56.9% 53.5% 52 %
Debt and interest burden
Interest coverage (times)
Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt.
1.0 1.6 33 %
Financial costs as a share of debt
All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate.
6.1% 5.2% 65 %
Long-term share of debt
Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year.
86.2% 83.2% 54 %

Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.3 MNOK.

Of the financial costs of 0.7 MNOK, 0.7 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.

The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.

Our calculations Returns and quality · 2024

Returns, debt against earnings and quality

Returns, debt against earnings and quality · 2024
MeasureCompanyMedianHigher than
Returns
Return on equity (ROE)
Net result over the average of equity at the start and end of the year (the end alone when last year is missing). Not calculated with negative equity.
– 10.8% not compared
Return on capital employed (ROCE)
Operating result over capital employed, that is total assets less current liabilities. The return regardless of how the company is financed.
7.2% 7.5% 48 %
Net margin
Net result over revenue. The first part of the DuPont split of return on equity.
−2.5% 17.3% 25 %
Asset turnover (revenue over assets)
Revenue over total assets: how many kroner of revenue each krone of assets gives. The second part of the DuPont split.
0.11 0.16 29 %
Equity multiplier
Total assets over equity: 4 means three quarters is financed with debt. The third part of the DuPont split.
– 3.14 not compared
Debt and financing
Net debt in times operating result
Long-term liabilities less cash, over the operating result: roughly how many years the business must earn to repay the debt. A negative figure means more cash than long-term debt. Rough, because the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. Only calculated when the operating result is positive.
12.2 5.5 72 %
Fixed-asset cover
Equity plus long-term liabilities over fixed assets (total assets less current assets). Below 1: fixed assets are partly financed with short-term debt.
1.18 1.02 74 %
Quick ratio (without inventory)
Cash plus receivables over current liabilities. Like the current ratio but without inventory and short-term investments.
1.77 1.23 60 %
Quality and resilience
Effective tax rate
Tax expense over profit before tax, only when the profit is positive. Far from 22% points to one-off items, tax losses carried forward or group contributions.
– 22.0% not compared
Operating leverage
Percentage change in operating result over percentage change in revenue from last year. 3 means a 1% fall in revenue gives a 3% fall in operating result. Only calculated when revenue moved at least 2% and last year's operating result was positive.
0.6 1.3 29 %
Payroll costs over revenue
Payroll costs (with employer's contribution and pension) over revenue. Shows how much of revenue is a fixed cost in a service business.
– 14.0% not compared
Revenue safety margin
How far revenue can fall before the operating result is zero, assuming payroll is fixed and all other costs follow revenue. A calculation, not a measurement: depreciation and rent are also fixed, so reality is lower.
– 79.4% not compared
Cash runway (months)
Cash over the operating loss per month, only for years with a loss. Assumes the loss continues unchanged and no new financing arrives. Capped at 120 months.
– 10 mo. not compared

The median and the bar are for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: high is not always good. The figures are our own calculations from the annual accounts and do not count in the score. Open data has no depreciation, so no EBITDA, and the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. How we calculate

Analysis · 2024

What the numbers say

Brumar AS had an operating margin of 58.3% and an equity ratio of −5.5% in 2024, and ranks 21,712 of 28,599 in Eiendom.

From 2023 to 2024: the operating margin rose from 35.9% to 58.3% and went from a profit to a loss before tax.

This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.

Estimated value · 2024

Three simple methods

Our calculations

Suggested price: about 1 MNOK

The mean of the 2 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. Fewer than three methods gave a figure, so the mean is weaker than it looks. The methods differ widely (the highest is 3.3 times the lowest), so the estimate is uncertain.
That is about 18.30 NOK per share, on 53,000 shares in the shareholder register.

The methods give between 0 MNOK and 1 MNOK.

MethodInputMultipleListed basisEstimate
P/E Net profit (mean 2023–2024): 0.2 MNOK 11.3 2 MNOK 1 MNOK
EV/EBIT Operating profit (mean 2023–2024): 0.8 MNOK
less net debt 8.1 MNOK (rough figure)
16.6 6 MNOK 0 MNOK
P/B Equity: −0.6 MNOK 0.9 – not meaningful
EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equityNOK
Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple14 MNOK
Enterprise value after the size adjustment9 MNOK
Less net debt (rough figure)8 MNOK
Equity value0 MNOK

Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is 95% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.

The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.

The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.1): Real Estate (Development).

Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more

A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation

Our calculations

Figures you will not find in any register

We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate

Implied dividend (net payout)
0.1 MNOK left equity beyond the result in 2025.
That equals 6% of the year's result.
Over 2 years it equals 6% of the sum of the results.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure.
Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
No sign of a near generation change in the ages.
  • The chair is under 60.
  • The managing director is under 60.
  • 0 of 1 on the board are 60 or older.
Age is this year minus the birth year in the registers and can be a year off. It says something about age, not about anyone planning to step down.

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

2024

Questions and answers

How profitable is Brumar AS?

The operating margin was 58.3% in 2024, against a median of 46.9% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 6.2%. The company made a loss before tax.

How solid is Brumar AS?

The equity ratio was −5.5% in 2024 (median 27.4%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.

What is the liquidity of Brumar AS like?

The current ratio was 1.88 in 2024 (median 1.37).

How does Brumar AS compare in Eiendom?

Brumar AS ranks 21,712 of 28,599 in Eiendom for 2024. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 17,179 of 22,743. Revenue changed by −59.5% from the year before.

Group structure · 2025

4 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.

Private persons own 100% of the shares in Brumar Holding AS. Persons are not shown by name.

Brumar Holding AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.

The group in figures

Sectors
Eiendom (3 companies), Overnatting og servering (1 company) 4 of 4 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
Negative equity
1 company: Villa Romsdalen AS
Loss
2 companies: Brumar Utvikling AS, Villa Romsdalen AS

A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.

  • Brumar Holding AS holding company · Eiendom
    • Brumar AS you are here 100% owned · operating · index 54 · number 12453 of 30124 in Eiendom
    • Brumar Utvikling AS 100% owned · operating · Eiendom
    • Villa Romsdalen AS 100% owned · operating · Overnatting og servering · negative equity

Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.

Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.

Ownership and roles

Loading roles …

Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 4 November 2026. Only names are shown.

Shareholders (2025)

Number of shareholders
1 (one owner)
Largest owner
100.0%
Split
companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
Owned from the same municipality
100%
Group chain
Owned by: Brumar Holding AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person

The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.

Holds shares in: Acegame AS (0%)

Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.

Error in the data?

Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.

Report an issue

Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information

Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.

Details

Year by year · 2023–2025

Key figure202320242025Trend
Index323854
Rank21,51121,71212,453
Operating margin35.9%58.3%54.0%
Return on assets11.6%6.2%15.7%
Equity ratio−6.5%−5.5%4.6%
Current ratio0.681.883.05
Revenue growth–−59.5%246.5%

Accounts

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue2.8 MNOK1.1 MNOK3.9 MNOK
Operating profit1.0 MNOK0.7 MNOK2.1 MNOK
Profit before tax0.5 MNOK0.0 MNOK1.4 MNOK
Tax expense–0.0 MNOK0.1 MNOK
Net profit0.5 MNOK0.0 MNOK1.3 MNOK
Financial expenses0.5 MNOK0.7 MNOK0.8 MNOK
Total assets8.6 MNOK10.7 MNOK13.5 MNOK
Current assets0.9 MNOK2.9 MNOK3.7 MNOK
Equity−0.6 MNOK−0.6 MNOK0.6 MNOK
Retained earnings−1.1 MNOK−1.1 MNOK0.1 MNOK
Total liabilities9.2 MNOK11.3 MNOK12.9 MNOK
Current liabilities1.3 MNOK1.6 MNOK1.2 MNOK

Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6330365.

Similar companies