Vesterhav Eigedom AS

Org. no. 927044234 · Askvoll · AS

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

Key facts

Employees – Not registered in the Central Coordinating Register
Operating revenue · 2025 0.2 MNOK Micro
Net profit · 2025 0.0 MNOK
Equity · 2025 5.0 MNOK
Founded 2021 5 years in operation
Sector Eiendom 68.200
Quick check · fiscal year 2025

Is the company run well?

Five key figures against companies in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.

  • Profitability · operating margin −30.1% Weaker than the industry Industry: 47.7%
  • Returns · return on assets −0.5% Weaker than the industry Industry: 7.8%
  • Solidity · equity ratio 99.8% Better than the industry Industry: 27.9%
  • Liquidity · current ratio 75.41 Better than the industry Industry: 1.40
  • Growth · revenue growth 36.2% Better than the industry Industry: 3.3%

The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology

Score · fiscal year 2025

Not enough data: Not enough data (below minimum revenue)

Based on the annual accounts for 2025

Source: Register of Company Accounts and Central Coordinating RegisterFetched 9 November 2026Report an issue
Development

How it has gone · 2023–2025

Revenue rose by 17 % from 2023 to 2025, to 0.2 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −565.5% in 2023 to −30.1% in 2025. The equity ratio is about the same: 99.8% in 2025 against 99.7% in 2023.

Operating revenue · 2025 0.2 MNOK +17% since 2023 (better)
Net profit · 2025 0.0 MNOK from −0.6 MNOK in 2023 (better)
Operating margin · 2025 −30.1% +535.4 pp since 2023 (better)
Equity ratio · 2025 99.8% about the same since 2023
Current ratio · 2025 75.41 −19.45 since 2023 (weaker)

Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year

Accounts in short

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue0.2 MNOK0.1 MNOK0.2 MNOK
Operating profit−0.9 MNOK−0.1 MNOK−0.1 MNOK
Net profit−0.6 MNOK−0.1 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Total assets5.2 MNOK5.1 MNOK5.0 MNOK
Equity5.1 MNOK5.1 MNOK5.0 MNOK
Total liabilities0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year

From the Central Coordinating Register

Org. no.
927044234
Legal form
AS
Sector
Eiendom (68.200)
Purpose
Eie, drive og utvikle eiendom, samt annet som står i naturlig forbindelse med dette.
Morning company class
Micro
Employees
0–4 (not registered)
Founded
22 February 2021 5 years in operation
Share capital
1.04 MNOK
Business address
c/o Øystein Fedøy, Fedøyvegen 28, 6987 BULANDET (ASKVOLL)
Municipality
Askvoll rank 19–30 of 39 in KOSTRA group 4
Audit
Audit opted out from 24 October 2023
Latest accounts filed
2025
VAT registered
Yes
The company's business municipality, Askvoll. The map shows the municipality, not the address. Map source: Kartverket (CC BY 4.0).

Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre

Indications · 2025

Worth a closer look

  • watch

    The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?

    Based on: Profit margin −14.5% (median 24.4%).

  • watch

    The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?

    Based on: Operating margin −30.1% (median 47.7%).

Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.

Financial costs were 0.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.

See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector

Data quality

No anomalies found in the figures.

Stress test · 2022

Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year

We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.

The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology

Key figures · 2025

The numbers behind the score

The numbers behind the score · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianAhead of
Operating revenue0 MNOK2 MNOK
Operating margin −30.1% 47.7% not compared
Profit margin −14.5% 24.4% shown, not part of the index
Return on assets −0.5% 7.8% not compared
Equity ratio 99.8% 27.9% not compared
Debt-to-equity 0.00 2.10 not compared
Current ratio 75.41 1.40 not compared
Revenue growth 36.2% 3.3% not compared

The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.

Over time

Score over time

Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.

Working capital and debt · 2025

Working capital and debt

Working capital and debt · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianHigher than
Working capital
Receivable days
All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue.
18 days 40 days not compared
Inventory and other current assets, days
Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue.
0 days 0 days not compared
Net working capital to revenue
Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations.
−1.4% −12.4% not compared
Cash share of current assets
How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash.
99.0% 54.9% not compared
Debt and interest burden
Interest coverage (times)
Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt.
−2,874.3 1.8 not compared
Financial costs as a share of debt
All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate.
0.2% 5.0% not compared
Long-term share of debt
Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year.
– 87.8% not compared

The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.

Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.0 MNOK.

Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.

The median and the bar refer to companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.

Our calculations Returns and quality · 2025

Returns, debt against earnings and quality

Returns, debt against earnings and quality · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianHigher than
Returns
Return on equity (ROE)
Net result over the average of equity at the start and end of the year (the end alone when last year is missing). Not calculated with negative equity.
−0.5% 12.0% not compared
Return on capital employed (ROCE)
Operating result over capital employed, that is total assets less current liabilities. The return regardless of how the company is financed.
−1.1% 7.8% not compared
Net margin
Net result over revenue. The first part of the DuPont split of return on equity.
−14.5% 19.5% not compared
Asset turnover (revenue over assets)
Revenue over total assets: how many kroner of revenue each krone of assets gives. The second part of the DuPont split.
0.04 0.16 not compared
Equity multiplier
Total assets over equity: 4 means three quarters is financed with debt. The third part of the DuPont split.
1.00 3.09 not compared
Debt and financing
Net debt in times operating result
Long-term liabilities less cash, over the operating result: roughly how many years the business must earn to repay the debt. A negative figure means more cash than long-term debt. Rough, because the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. Only calculated when the operating result is positive.
– 6.9 not compared
Fixed-asset cover
Equity plus long-term liabilities over fixed assets (total assets less current assets). Below 1: fixed assets are partly financed with short-term debt.
– 1.01 not compared
Quick ratio (without inventory)
Cash plus receivables over current liabilities. Like the current ratio but without inventory and short-term investments.
75.41 1.24 not compared
Quality and resilience
Effective tax rate
Tax expense over profit before tax, only when the profit is positive. Far from 22% points to one-off items, tax losses carried forward or group contributions.
– 22.0% not compared
Operating leverage
Percentage change in operating result over percentage change in revenue from last year. 3 means a 1% fall in revenue gives a 3% fall in operating result. Only calculated when revenue moved at least 2% and last year's operating result was positive.
– 1.4 not compared
Payroll costs over revenue
Payroll costs (with employer's contribution and pension) over revenue. Shows how much of revenue is a fixed cost in a service business.
– 12.5% not compared
Revenue safety margin
How far revenue can fall before the operating result is zero, assuming payroll is fixed and all other costs follow revenue. A calculation, not a measurement: depreciation and rent are also fixed, so reality is lower.
– 81.7% not compared
Cash runway (months)
Cash over the operating loss per month, only for years with a loss. Assumes the loss continues unchanged and no new financing arrives. Capped at 120 months.
120 mo. 10 mo. not compared

DuPont on the closing balance: net margin −14.5% × asset turnover 0.04 × multiplier 1.00 = −0.5% of equity at the end of the year. The return on equity above uses average equity and can differ slightly.

The operating result is not positive, so net debt over operating result and the safety margin are not calculated.

The median and the bar are for companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: high is not always good. The figures are our own calculations from the annual accounts and do not count in the score. Open data has no depreciation, so no EBITDA, and the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. How we calculate

The industry or the company: what drove the result?

In 2025 the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS rose by 52.4 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 51.6 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.

Over 2 year-to-year changes Vesterhav Eigedom AS moved the same way as comparable companies 2 times. About 0% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.

The operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS against comparable companies, year by year
YearThe companyComparable (median) Change, companyChange, industryThe company's own
2024−82.5%46.9% +483.0 percentage points +0.9 percentage points +482.1 percentage points
2025−30.1%47.7% +52.4 percentage points +0.7 percentage points +51.6 percentage points

Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.

The company and its sector's drivers

Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.

House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))

House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS rose 52.4 percentage points.

House prices (existing homes) per year and the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
House prices (existing homes), annual average134.5141.6140.8144.6152.5158.7 (so far)
Change from the year before+10.5%+5.2%−0.5%+2.7%+5.5%+4.1%
The company's operating margin––−565.5%−82.5%−30.1%–

Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source

Policy rate (prosent)

Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS rose 52.4 percentage points.

Policy rate per year and the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Policy rate, annual average0.081.323.544.504.304.17 (so far)
Change from the year before−0.28 percentage points+1.24 percentage points+2.22 percentage points+0.96 percentage points−0.20 percentage points−0.12 percentage points
The company's operating margin––−565.5%−82.5%−30.1%–

Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source

Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))

Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS rose 52.4 percentage points.

Construction cost index for dwellings per year and the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average124.2135.1141.1146.4152.7158.7 (so far)
Change from the year before+8.7%+8.8%+4.4%+3.7%+4.3%+3.9%
The company's operating margin––−565.5%−82.5%−30.1%–

Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source

Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))

Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS rose 52.4 percentage points.

Consumer price index per year and the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Consumer price index, annual average84.389.294.197.0100.0103.0 (so far)
Change from the year before+3.5%+5.8%+5.5%+3.2%+3.0%+3.0%
The company's operating margin––−565.5%−82.5%−30.1%–

Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source

Wage index: real estate (indeks)

Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS rose 52.4 percentage points.

Wage index: real estate per year and the operating margin of Vesterhav Eigedom AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Wage index: real estate, annual average91.794.396.8103.2108.5111.3 (so far)
Change from the year before+5.2%+2.9%+2.6%+6.5%+5.2%+2.6%
The company's operating margin––−565.5%−82.5%−30.1%–

Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source

We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.

Analysis · 2025

What the numbers say

Vesterhav Eigedom AS had an equity ratio of 99.8% in 2025. The company is not ranked: not enough data (below minimum revenue).

From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −82.5% to −30.1% and revenue grew by 36%.

This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.

Estimated value · 2025

Three simple methods

Our calculations

Suggested price: about 2 MNOK

The mean of the 1 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. Fewer than three methods gave a figure, so the mean is weaker than it looks.
That is about 2,122 NOK per share, on 1,037 shares in the shareholder register.

One method gives a figure: 2 MNOK.

MethodInputMultipleListed basisEstimate
P/E Net profit (mean 2023–2025): −0.2 MNOK 10.5 – not meaningful
EV/EBIT Operating profit (mean 2023–2025): −0.3 MNOK 19.2 – not meaningful
P/B Equity: 5.0 MNOK 0.7 4 MNOK 2 MNOK

The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.

The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..

Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more

A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation

Our calculations

Figures you will not find in any register

We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate

Equity paid out or paid in
Equity moved as the result implied in 2025.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure.
Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
No sign of a near generation change in the ages.
  • The chair is under 60.
  • The managing director is under 60.
  • 0 of 3 on the board are 60 or older.
Age is this year minus the birth year in the registers and can be a year off. It says something about age, not about anyone planning to step down.

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

2025

Questions and answers

How profitable is Vesterhav Eigedom AS?

The operating margin was −30.1% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −0.5%. The company made a loss before tax.

How solid is Vesterhav Eigedom AS?

The equity ratio was 99.8% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 0.00 (median 2.10).

What is the liquidity of Vesterhav Eigedom AS like?

The current ratio was 75.41 in 2025 (median 1.40).

Ownership and roles

Loading roles …

Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 4 November 2026. Only names are shown.

Shareholders (2025)

Number of shareholders
3
Largest owner
50.0%
Split
companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
  • Klona AS · 50.0%
  • Hareholmen AS · 37.5%
  • Leiaholmen AS · 12.5%

The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.

Holds shares in: Lerøy Bulandet AS (4%), Bulandet Eigedom AS (5%)

Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.

Error in the data?

Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.

Report an issue

Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information

Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.

Details

Year by year · 2023–2025

Key figure202320242025Trend
Index–––
Rank–––
Operating margin−565.5%−82.5%−30.1%
Return on assets−10.7%−1.6%−0.5%
Equity ratio99.7%99.9%99.8%
Current ratio94.87437.8775.41
Revenue growth–−13.8%36.2%

Accounts

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue0.2 MNOK0.1 MNOK0.2 MNOK
Operating profit−0.9 MNOK−0.1 MNOK−0.1 MNOK
Profit before tax−0.6 MNOK−0.1 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Tax expense0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Net profit−0.6 MNOK−0.1 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Financial expenses0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Total assets5.2 MNOK5.1 MNOK5.0 MNOK
Current assets1.3 MNOK1.4 MNOK0.9 MNOK
Equity5.1 MNOK5.1 MNOK5.0 MNOK
Retained earnings4.1 MNOK4.0 MNOK4.0 MNOK
Total liabilities0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Current liabilities0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK

Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6489313.