TRE E AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
48of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 49 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 804 of 1,571 · Kraft og energi
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 78 and solidity 0 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
TRE E AS is 1 points below the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 49 among 1,302 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 34.0% (median 10.9%) and equity ratio −46.5% (median 38.2%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 34.0% | 10.9% |
| Profit margin | 4.5% | 2.1% |
| Return on assets | 10.8% | 0.4% |
| Equity ratio | −46.5% | 38.2% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.06 |
| Current ratio | – | 1.67 |
| Revenue growth | 1,360.2% | 0.8% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 48, TRE E AS does better than 49% of small companies in the same sector (1,315 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- TRE E AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
TRE E AS has a score of 48 for 2025, rank 804 of 1,571 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 99 against peers, revenue growth 1,360.2% against a median of 0.8%. Profitability: percentile 78 against peers, operating margin 34.0% against a median of 10.9%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −46.5% against a median of 38.2%. Consistency: percentile 19 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −46.5% (median 38.2%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
TRE E AS had an operating margin of 34.0% and an equity ratio of −46.5% in 2025, and ranks 804 of 1,571 in Kraft og energi.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −752.8% to 34.0% and revenue grew by 1,360%.
TRE E AS did about the same as the sector in 2025, the sector's weakest year.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 0 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | debt above value |
| P/B | 1.0 | not meaningful |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −46.5% (median 38.2%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
The operating margin was 34.0% in 2025 (sector median 12.6%), and the equity ratio −46.5%. In the other years the operating margin averaged −447.1%.
The sector's weakest year was 2025, with a median operating margin of 12.6%. Based on the 5 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 78 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | – | no data, left out |
| Growth | 99 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 19 | weight 15% |
Durability: 25 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 85%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is TRE E AS?
The operating margin was 34.0% in 2025, against a median of 10.9% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 10.8%.
How solid is TRE E AS?
The equity ratio was −46.5% in 2025 (median 38.2%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
How does TRE E AS compare in Kraft og energi?
TRE E AS ranks 804 of 1,571 in Kraft og energi for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 669 of 1,315. Revenue changed by 1,360.2% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 927598957
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Kraft og energi (35.129)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 5 August 2021 5 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o Sunniva Brennmoen Strypet, Motzfeldts gate 16A, 0187 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 106–282 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 26 August 2021
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chair of the board
- Sunniva Brennmoen Strypet
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 25 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 27 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 8 | 20 | 48 | |
| Rank | 1,369 | 1,364 | 804 | |
| Operating margin | −141.5% | −752.8% | 34.0% | |
| Return on assets | −18.8% | −14.5% | 10.8% | |
| Equity ratio | −18.5% | −42.6% | −46.5% | |
| Current ratio | – | 292.24 | – | |
| Revenue growth | – | −88.8% | 1,360.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.2 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.5 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Equity | −0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.6 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | – | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 27 October 2026, accounts id 7119537.
Further
Similar companies
- VINDR AS index 48, rank 800 · compare
- BEITSTAD BIOVARME AS index 48, rank 802 · compare
- BLÅFALL AS index 48, rank 803 · compare
- MILENCE INFRASTRUCTURE NORWAY 1 AS index 48, rank 806 · compare
- AURSJOKRAFT AS index 48, rank 807 · compare