NORDIC MPP AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
37of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 24 % of medium-sized companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 1,506 of 2,035 · Sjøfart
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 12 and solidity 96 out of 100 among medium-sized companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
NORDIC MPP AS is 11 points below the median for medium-sized companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 48 among 456 companies.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0 MNOK | 197 MNOK |
| Operating margin | – | 22.9% |
| Profit margin | – | 13.4% |
| Return on assets | 0.0% | 7.6% |
| Equity ratio | 99.9% | 50.4% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Current ratio | 0.10 | 1.33 |
| Revenue growth | – | 2.4% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to medium-sized companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 37, NORDIC MPP AS does better than 24% of medium-sized companies in the same sector (456 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- NORDIC MPP AS
- Median: medium-sized companies in the same sector
NORDIC MPP AS has a score of 37 for 2025, rank 1,506 of 2,035 in the sector.
Strongest: Solidity: percentile 96 against peers, equity ratio 99.9% against a median of 50.4%.
Weakest: Liquidity: percentile 6 against peers, current ratio 0.10 against a median of 1.33. Profitability: percentile 12 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 10.3 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.10 (median 1.33).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin – (median 13.4%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
NORDIC MPP AS had an operating margin of – and an equity ratio of 99.9% in 2025, and ranks 1,506 of 2,035 in Sjøfart.
No large changes in the key figures from 2024 to 2025.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 191 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 191 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 10.3 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.10 (median 1.33).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin – (median 13.4%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 2.8% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
- watch No revenue but large assets
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 6.1%. Based on the 7 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 12 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 96 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 6 | weight 15% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 20 | weight 15% |
Durability: 42 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 85%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is NORDIC MPP AS?
The operating margin was – in 2025, against a median of 22.9% among medium-sized companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 0.0%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is NORDIC MPP AS?
The equity ratio was 99.9% in 2025 (median 50.4%). Debt-to-equity was 0.00 (median 0.85).
What is the liquidity of NORDIC MPP AS like?
The current ratio was 0.10 in 2025 (median 1.33). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does NORDIC MPP AS compare in Sjøfart?
NORDIC MPP AS ranks 1,506 of 2,035 in Sjøfart for 2025. Among companies of the same size (medium-sized companies) it ranks 348 of 456.
Group accounts · 2025
53 of 100
Rank 429 of 975 groups with group accounts. Groups are ranked only against each other, not against single companies.
| Key figure | The group | The company alone (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 4.5% | – |
| Return on assets | 5.4% | 0.0% |
| Equity ratio | 74.6% | 99.9% |
| Current ratio | 1.42 | 0.10 |
| Revenue growth | −28.1% | – |
Group index in earlier years: 2023: 80 (100 of 1176), 2024: 72 (128 of 994).
Same formulas and weights as the company index. Group and company are never added together, and the group accounts are not part of sector averages or company rankings.
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre, group accounts 2025 (open data, NLOD 2.0).
We do not show the group structure, because open data does not say who owns whom.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 927989255
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Sjøfart (50.201)
- Size tier
- medium
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 17 September 2021 5 years in operation
- Share capital
- 3.80 MNOK
- Business address
- Munkedamsveien 62C, 0270 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 106–282 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chair of the board
- Peder Nicolai Jarlsby
- Board member
- Richard Grube
- Auditor
- CEDRA NORGE AS
- Accountant
- CLARKSONS BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 25 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 27 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 52 | 38 | 37 | |
| Rank | 783 | 1,394 | 1,506 | |
| Operating margin | – | – | – | |
| Return on assets | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Equity ratio | 100.0% | 100.0% | 99.9% | |
| Current ratio | 8.44 | 0.42 | 0.10 | |
| Revenue growth | – | – | – |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 318.3 MNOK | 217.5 MNOK | 191.0 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 318.2 MNOK | 217.5 MNOK | 190.9 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −5.8 MNOK | −5.9 MNOK | −6.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 27 October 2026, accounts id 7228750.
Further
Similar companies
- TORGHATTEN AS index 37, rank 1,498 · compare
- INFRARED INFRASTRUCTURE VI GALLEY BIDCO AS index 37, rank 1,501 · compare
- EBONY AS index 37, rank 1,503 · compare
- HANSA BIDCO AS index 37, rank 1,504 · compare
- HAVILA CAPELLA AS index 37, rank 1,507 · compare