LYSE STRØM AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
41of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 31 % of large companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 1,021 of 1,571 · Kraft og energi
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 36 and solidity 10 out of 100 among large companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
LYSE STRØM AS is 7 points below the median for large companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 48 among 72 companies.
Against large companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 1.1% (median 20.8%) and equity ratio 22.2% (median 49.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1,005 MNOK | 2,286 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 1.1% | 20.8% |
| Profit margin | 1.4% | 18.0% |
| Return on assets | 4.5% | 4.5% |
| Equity ratio | 22.2% | 49.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 3.50 | 1.03 |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 1.18 |
| Revenue growth | 15.6% | 9.4% |
| Revenue per employee | 45.68 MNOK | 29.91 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to large companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 41, LYSE STRØM AS does better than 31% of large companies in the same sector (72 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- LYSE STRØM AS
- Median: large companies in the same sector
LYSE STRØM AS has a score of 41 for 2025, rank 1,021 of 1,571 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 67 against peers, revenue growth 15.6% against a median of 9.4%. Consistency: percentile 66 against peers.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 10 against peers, equity ratio 22.2% against a median of 49.5%. Profitability: percentile 36 against peers, operating margin 1.1% against a median of 20.8%.
Worth a closer look
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin 1.1% (median 20.8%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
LYSE STRØM AS had an operating margin of 1.1% and an equity ratio of 22.2% in 2025, and ranks 1,021 of 1,571 in Kraft og energi.
From 2024 to 2025: the equity ratio rose from 6.2% to 22.2% and revenue grew by 16%.
LYSE STRØM AS did about the same as the sector in 2025, the sector's weakest year.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 56 MNOK and 112 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 112 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | 56 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.0 | 90 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin 1.1% (median 20.8%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
The operating margin was 1.1% in 2025 (sector median 12.6%), and the equity ratio 22.2%. In the other years the operating margin averaged 2.9%.
The sector's weakest year was 2025, with a median operating margin of 12.6%. Based on the 5 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 36 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 10 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 54 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 67 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 66 | weight 15% |
Durability: 35 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is LYSE STRØM AS?
The operating margin was 1.1% in 2025, against a median of 20.8% among large companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 4.5%.
How solid is LYSE STRØM AS?
The equity ratio was 22.2% in 2025 (median 49.5%). Debt-to-equity was 3.50 (median 1.03).
What is the liquidity of LYSE STRØM AS like?
The current ratio was 1.24 in 2025 (median 1.18).
How does LYSE STRØM AS compare in Kraft og energi?
LYSE STRØM AS ranks 1,021 of 1,571 in Kraft og energi for 2025. Among companies of the same size (large companies) it ranks 50 of 72. Revenue changed by 15.6% from the year before.
Group accounts
The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
We do not show the group structure, because open data does not say who owns whom.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 929415957
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Kraft og energi (35.150)
- Size tier
- large
- Employees
- 22 registered 10 September 2026
- Founded
- 24 May 2022 4 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Breiflåtveien 18, 4017 STAVANGER
- Municipality
- Stavanger rank 5–9 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Ane Christophersen
- Chair of the board
- Leiv Ingve Ørke
- Board member
- Eirik Brekne Aanestad
- Board member
- Astrid Rebekka Norheim
- Auditor
- DELOITTE AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 27 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 24 | 39 | 41 | |
| Rank | 1,196 | 1,039 | 1,021 | |
| Operating margin | 5.5% | 0.2% | 1.1% | |
| Return on assets | 3.9% | 2.2% | 4.5% | |
| Equity ratio | 3.1% | 6.2% | 22.2% | |
| Current ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.24 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 52.5% | 15.6% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 570.0 MNOK | 869.4 MNOK | 1,004.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 31.6 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK | 10.8 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 35.5 MNOK | 9.3 MNOK | 14.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | 27.7 MNOK | 7.2 MNOK | 11.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK |
| Total assets | 906.4 MNOK | 462.0 MNOK | 403.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 720.2 MNOK | 338.0 MNOK | 351.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 28.2 MNOK | 28.5 MNOK | 89.7 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 27.7 MNOK | 28.0 MNOK | 39.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 878.2 MNOK | 433.5 MNOK | 313.9 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 724.1 MNOK | 339.7 MNOK | 283.4 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 27 October 2026, accounts id 7107533.
Further
Similar companies
- ARVA AS index 42, rank 985 · compare
- FORTUM STRØM AS index 42, rank 988 · compare
- GLITRE NETT AS index 42, rank 994 · compare
- BKK AS index 41, rank 1,022 · compare
- NTE ENERGI AS index 40, rank 1,042 · compare