Current Value AS
Score · fiscal year 2024
33of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 21 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 1,628 of 2,065 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 3,176 of 3,932 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 3 and solidity 12 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. Methodology
Against the sector
Current Value AS is 17 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024.
Median score 50 among 2,065 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024: operating margin −231.8% (median 5.8%) and equity ratio 4.5% (median 41.8%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −231.8% | 5.8% |
| Profit margin | −262.5% | 5.6% |
| Return on assets | −63.8% | 11.5% |
| Equity ratio | 4.5% | 41.8% |
| Debt-to-equity | 21.07 | 1.07 |
| Current ratio | 2.08 | 1.63 |
| Revenue growth | 238.9% | 5.4% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.11 MNOK | 0.69 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 33, Current Value AS does better than 21% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (2,065 companies) in 2024.
Score 2023–2025
- Current Value AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
What the numbers say
Current Value AS had an operating margin of −231.8% and an equity ratio of 4.5% in 2024, and ranks 3,176 of 3,932 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
From 2023 to 2024: the operating margin fell from −148.1% to −231.8% and revenue grew by 239%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 0 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.6 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 15.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.2 | 0 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered by 51% for an unlisted company: 20% for lack of marketability and 38% for size (a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity).
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 4.5% (median 41.8%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −262.5% (median 5.6%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −231.8% (median 5.8%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 9.2% of the debt in 2024. The policy rate averaged 4.50 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- watch Extreme margin: check the figures
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 3 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 12 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 63 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 96 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 32 | weight 15% |
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Current Value AS?
The operating margin was −231.8% in 2024, against a median of 5.8% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −63.8%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Current Value AS?
The equity ratio was 4.5% in 2024 (median 41.8%). Debt-to-equity was 21.07 (median 1.07).
What is the liquidity of Current Value AS like?
The current ratio was 2.08 in 2024 (median 1.63).
How does Current Value AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
Current Value AS ranks 3,176 of 3,932 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2024. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 1,628 of 2,065. Revenue changed by 238.9% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 930516872
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (74.990)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 11 registered 10 June 2026
- Founded
- 13 October 2022 4 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.20 MNOK
- Business address
- Jacob Kjødes veg 15, 5232 PARADIS (BERGEN)
- Municipality
- Bergen rank 8 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 21 December 2022
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: Current Value Holding AS
- Current Value Holding AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 5 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | 33 | 30 | |
| Rank | – | 3,176 | 3,330 | |
| Operating margin | −148.1% | −231.8% | −97.4% | |
| Return on assets | −12.6% | −63.8% | −34.5% | |
| Equity ratio | −8.1% | 4.5% | 15.0% | |
| Current ratio | 4.61 | 2.08 | 1.05 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 238.9% | 245.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.4 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.5 MNOK | −2.8 MNOK | −4.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.6 MNOK | −3.2 MNOK | −4.4 MNOK |
| Tax expense | −0.1 MNOK | −0.7 MNOK | −1.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.5 MNOK | −2.5 MNOK | −3.4 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 4.1 MNOK | 4.4 MNOK | 11.8 MNOK |
| Current assets | 2.3 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK | 6.6 MNOK |
| Equity | −0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −0.5 MNOK | −3.0 MNOK | – |
| Total liabilities | 4.4 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK | 10.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.5 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 6.3 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 5 November 2026, accounts id 6166181.
Further
Similar companies
- Reprovet AS index 33, rank 3,169 · compare
- Polyteknikk AS index 33, rank 3,170 · compare
- Plan3 Arkitektur AS index 33, rank 3,173 · compare
- Kongelf Media AS index 32, rank 3,182 · compare
- Eikr Arkitektur AS index 32, rank 3,183 · compare