Moonbase AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
36of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 24 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 3,668 of 4,817 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 5,647 of 7,315 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 32 and resilience 13 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Moonbase AS is 15 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 4,811 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 0.9% (median 6.6%) and equity ratio 0.6% (median 39.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 0.9% | 6.6% |
| Profit margin | 0.9% | 6.8% |
| Return on assets | 0.9% | 13.1% |
| Equity ratio | 0.6% | 39.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 164.59 | 1.07 |
| Current ratio | 1.00 | 1.54 |
| Revenue growth | 104.6% | 6.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 36, Moonbase AS does better than 24% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (4,817 companies) in 2025.
Score over time
Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
163 days | 46 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−140.2% | −9.3% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
75.9% | 56.5% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
1.1 | 9.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.4% | 0.8% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.4% | 0.3% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −2.4 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Moonbase AS has a score of 36 for 2025, rank 5,647 of 7,315 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 75 against peers, revenue growth 104.6% against a median of 6.5%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 8 against peers, equity ratio 0.6% against a median of 39.5%. Consistency: percentile 18 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 0.6% (median 39.5%).
- Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have? Based on: revenue growth 104.6% (median 6.5%); current ratio 1.00 (median 1.54).
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 163 days (median 46 days).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Moonbase AS rose by 3.4 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.1 points. So the company did 3.3 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.9% | 6.6% | +3.4 percentage points | +0.1 percentage points | +3.3 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Moonbase AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Moonbase AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −2.5% | 0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Moonbase AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −2.5% | 0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Moonbase AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −2.5% | 0.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Moonbase AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −2.5% | 0.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Moonbase AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −2.5% | 0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Moonbase AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −2.5% | 0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Moonbase AS had an operating margin of 0.9% and an equity ratio of 0.6% in 2025, and ranks 5,647 of 7,315 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 105% and went from a loss to a profit before tax.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 0 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.6 | 0 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 0.6% (median 39.5%).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 104.6% (median 6.5%); Current ratio 1.00 (median 1.54).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 163 days (median 46 days).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −140.2% (median −9.3%); Current ratio 1.00 (median 1.54).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.4% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 32 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 8 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 23 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 75 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 18 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Moonbase AS?
The operating margin was 0.9% in 2025, against a median of 6.6% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 0.9%.
How solid is Moonbase AS?
The equity ratio was 0.6% in 2025 (median 39.5%). Debt-to-equity was 164.59 (median 1.07).
What is the liquidity of Moonbase AS like?
The current ratio was 1.00 in 2025 (median 1.54).
How does Moonbase AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Moonbase AS ranks 5,647 of 7,315 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 3,668 of 4,817. Revenue changed by 104.6% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mount AS |  Beaver |
2 MNOK | −65.8% | 28 |
| Young Coderz AS |  Lion |
2 MNOK | 49.8% | 76 |
| Teknologipartner AS |  Elephant |
2 MNOK | −31.6% | 26 |
| Moonbase AS (this company) | Beaver |
2 MNOK | 0.9% | 36 |
| Landsem Solutions Holding AS | Beaver |
2 MNOK | 4.6% | 51 |
| Unisot AS | Elephant |
2 MNOK | −6.7% | 55 |
| Fount AS | Beaver |
2 MNOK | −278.4% | 10 |
| Ambr Institute AS | Beaver |
2 MNOK | −292.9% | 13 |
| Trips AS |  Cheetah |
2 MNOK | 49.9% | 71 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
2 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Månevann AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Månevann AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (2 companies) 2 of 2 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 1 company: Månevann AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Månevann AS
- Moonbase AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 931730258
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.100)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 2 June 2023 3 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Utsikten 6, 3718 SKIEN
- Municipality
- Skien rank 9 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 18 July 2023
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 5 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 75.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Månevann AS (75%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner Månevann AS (holds 75%) made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Månevann AS · 75.0%
- Powder Ventures AS · 25.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | – | 36 | |
| Rank | – | – | 5,647 | |
| Operating margin | – | −2.5% | 0.9% | |
| Return on assets | −38.4% | −0.8% | 0.9% | |
| Equity ratio | 92.8% | 0.4% | 0.6% | |
| Current ratio | 12.64 | 1.04 | 1.00 | |
| Revenue growth | – | – | 104.6% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | – | 0.9 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.0 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK | 3.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.0 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.0 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.0 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 7119851.
Further
Similar companies
- Lewix AS index 36, rank 5,644 · compare
- FOTBALL.TV AS index 36, rank 5,645 · compare
- Kraft AI AS index 36, rank 5,646 · compare
- Ebit Group AS index 36, rank 5,649 · compare
- Net2you AS index 36, rank 5,650 · compare