Sigma Technology Elevate AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
43of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 33 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 1,022 of 1,531 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 4,794 of 7,317 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 37 and resilience 13 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Sigma Technology Elevate AS is 8 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,530 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 1.2% (median 5.3%) and equity ratio −61.9% (median 34.6%).
How it has gone · 2024–2025
Revenue rose by 104 % from 2024 to 2025, to 13.5 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −25.6% in 2024 to 1.2% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from −56.1% in 2024 to −61.9% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Sigma Technology Elevate AS has a score of 43 for 2025, rank 4,794 of 7,317 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 93 against peers, revenue growth 104.4% against a median of 7.7%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −61.9% against a median of 34.6%. Consistency: percentile 20 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −61.9% (median 34.6%).
- The operating result covers the financial costs less than one and a half times. How much higher interest or a weaker year can the company take? Based on: interest coverage (times) 1.2 (median 8.0); financial costs as a share of debt 3.1% (median 1.2%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −61.9% (median 34.6%).
- watch
The operating result covers the financial costs less than one and a half times. How much higher interest or a weaker year can the company take?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) 1.2 (median 8.0); Financial costs as a share of debt 3.1% (median 1.2%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 3.1% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 37 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 51 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 93 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 20 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 25 (average over 2 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 14 MNOK | 20 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 1.2% | 5.3% |
| Profit margin | 0.2% | 5.5% |
| Return on assets | 6.2% | 9.9% |
| Equity ratio | −61.9% | 34.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.61 |
| Current ratio | 1.35 | 1.34 |
| Revenue growth | 104.4% | 7.7% |
| Revenue per employee | 1.93 MNOK | 1.93 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 43, Sigma Technology Elevate AS does better than 33% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,531 companies) in 2025.
Score 2024–2025
- Sigma Technology Elevate AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
65 days | 73 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
3.3% | −7.8% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
9.0% | 43.2% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
1.2 | 8.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
3.1% | 1.2% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
54.2% | 13.9% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.4 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.1 MNOK, 0.1 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Sigma Technology Elevate AS rose by 26.8 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 1.2 points. So the company did 28.0 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.2% | 5.3% | +26.8 percentage points | −1.2 percentage points | +28.0 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Sigma Technology Elevate AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Sigma Technology Elevate AS rose 26.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −25.6% | 1.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Sigma Technology Elevate AS rose 26.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −25.6% | 1.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Sigma Technology Elevate AS rose 26.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −25.6% | 1.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Sigma Technology Elevate AS rose 26.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −25.6% | 1.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Sigma Technology Elevate AS rose 26.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −25.6% | 1.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Sigma Technology Elevate AS rose 26.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −25.6% | 1.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Sigma Technology Elevate AS had an operating margin of 1.2% and an equity ratio of −61.9% in 2025, and ranks 4,794 of 7,317 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −25.6% to 1.2% and revenue grew by 104%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.6 | not meaningful |
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Sigma Technology Elevate AS?
The operating margin was 1.2% in 2025, against a median of 5.3% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 6.2%.
How solid is Sigma Technology Elevate AS?
The equity ratio was −61.9% in 2025 (median 34.6%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of Sigma Technology Elevate AS like?
The current ratio was 1.35 in 2025 (median 1.34).
How does Sigma Technology Elevate AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Sigma Technology Elevate AS ranks 4,794 of 7,317 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 1,022 of 1,531. Revenue changed by 104.4% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kjell Bolstad AS |  Elephant |
14 MNOK | 6.3% | 56 |
| Memoservices AS · same municipality |  Beaver |
14 MNOK | −4.2% | 44 |
| Sigma Technology Elevate AS (this company) | Beaver |
14 MNOK | 1.2% | 43 |
| Østerhus Data og Sikkerhet AS |  Cheetah |
13 MNOK | 7.3% | 45 |
| AA Consultantgroup AS | Beaver |
13 MNOK | −5.0% | 20 |
| Iot Value AS | Cheetah |
13 MNOK | 25.9% | 68 |
| Kinver AS · same municipality | Elephant |
13 MNOK | −41.8% | 30 |
| X13 Consulting AS · same municipality |  Lion |
13 MNOK | 4.8% | 52 |
| Evikom AS · same municipality | Lion |
13 MNOK | 19.6% | 62 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
3 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Sigma Technology Group AB (foreign company) owns 70% of the shares in Sigma Technology Norway AS.
Sigma Technology Norway AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (3 companies) 3 of 3 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 7 in all. Oslo 7 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 3 companies: Sigma Technology Elevate AS, Sigma Technology Norway AS, Sigma Technology Systems AS
- Loss
- 2 companies: Sigma Technology Norway AS, Sigma Technology Systems AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Sigma Technology Norway AS
- Sigma Technology Elevate AS you are here
- Sigma Technology Systems AS
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 932759144
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.200)
- Purpose
- Drive konsulentvirksomhet og annen virksomhet som naturlig står i forbindelse med dette.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 7 registered 10 June 2026
- Founded
- 20 December 2023 2 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.05 MNOK
- Business address
- Karenslyst allé 46, 0279 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Website
- www.sigmatechnology.com/companies/sigma-technology-elevate/
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 90.0%
- Split
- companies 90% · private persons 10% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 90%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Sigma Technology Norway AS (90%)
Ultimate owner: Sigma Technology Group AB
The owner: the majority owner Sigma Technology Norway AS (holds 90%) had negative equity in 2025. made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Sigma Technology Norway AS · 90.0%
- 1 private persons · 10.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 7 November 2026.
Year by year · 2024–2025
| Key figure | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 7 | 43 | |
| Rank | 6,918 | 4,794 | |
| Operating margin | −25.6% | 1.2% | |
| Return on assets | −57.2% | 6.2% | |
| Equity ratio | −56.1% | −61.9% | |
| Current ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 104.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 6.6 MNOK | 13.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −1.7 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −1.7 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.7 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 3.0 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 3.0 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK |
| Equity | −1.7 MNOK | −1.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −1.7 MNOK | −1.7 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 4.6 MNOK | 4.3 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 4.6 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 7 November 2026, accounts id 6739332.
Further
Similar companies
- Yne AS index 43, rank 4,783 · compare
- Fiskher AS index 43, rank 4,788 · compare
- Jupiter Business Partner AS index 43, rank 4,792 · compare
- Elate AS index 43, rank 4,795 · compare
- Grensesnitt AS index 42, rank 4,797 · compare