FRM AS
Score · fiscal year 2024
78of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 95 % of small companies in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?
Rank: 1,575 of 31,120 · Bygg og anlegg
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 96 and solidity 63 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2024. Methodology
Against the sector
FRM AS is 28 points above the median for small companies in the same sector in 2024.
Median score 50 among 30,024 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2024: operating margin 45.5% (median 3.8%) and equity ratio 54.7% (median 36.8%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 45.5% | 3.8% |
| Profit margin | 45.5% | 3.4% |
| Return on assets | 67.8% | 5.8% |
| Equity ratio | 54.7% | 36.8% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.83 | 1.19 |
| Current ratio | 2.21 | 1.45 |
| Revenue growth | – | 1.8% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.18 MNOK | 1.40 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 78, FRM AS does better than 95% of small companies in the same sector (30,095 companies) in 2024.
Score 2024–2025
- FRM AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
What the numbers say
FRM AS had an operating margin of 45.5% and an equity ratio of 54.7% in 2024, and ranks 1,575 of 31,120 in Bygg og anlegg.
This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 1 MNOK and 10 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 9 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | 10 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.0 | 1 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.1% of the debt in 2024. The policy rate averaged 4.50 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 2.4%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 96 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 63 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 70 | weight 15% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 77 | weight 15% |
Index version 2. Data completeness 85%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is FRM AS?
The operating margin was 45.5% in 2024, against a median of 3.8% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 67.8%.
How solid is FRM AS?
The equity ratio was 54.7% in 2024 (median 36.8%). Debt-to-equity was 0.83 (median 1.19).
What is the liquidity of FRM AS like?
The current ratio was 2.21 in 2024 (median 1.45).
How does FRM AS compare in Bygg og anlegg?
FRM AS ranks 1,575 of 31,120 in Bygg og anlegg for 2024. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 1,525 of 30,095.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 932952408
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Bygg og anlegg (43.120)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 14 registered 10 August 2026
- Founded
- 25 January 2024 2 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Remmabrautvegen 10, 6320 ISFJORDEN (RAUMA)
- Municipality
- Rauma rank 5–20 of 40 in KOSTRA group 1
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chair of the board
- Marius Sæther Ytterli
- Board member
- Rune Haugen
- Board member
- Fredrik Mælen Båtstad
- Auditor
- VALENTOR REVISJON AS
- Accountant
- BØNDENES REGNSKAPSLAG SA
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 27 October 2026.
Year by year · 2024–2025
| Key figure | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 78 | 79 | |
| Rank | 1,575 | 1,414 | |
| Operating margin | 45.5% | 29.6% | |
| Return on assets | 67.8% | 54.9% | |
| Equity ratio | 54.7% | 54.9% | |
| Current ratio | 2.21 | 2.16 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 456.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.5 MNOK | 13.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.1 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 1.1 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.9 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.7 MNOK | 7.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.7 MNOK | 7.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.9 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.9 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.8 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.8 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 27 October 2026, accounts id 5711491.
Further
Similar companies
- BYKLE BYGG AS index 78, rank 1,576 · compare
- VAMSÆTER UTLEIE AS index 78, rank 1,577 · compare
- TJØSTHEIM INVEST AS index 78, rank 1,578 · compare
- EOSH HOLDING AS index 78, rank 1,579 · compare
- SVEIO BYGGSERVICE AS index 78, rank 1,580 · compare