Enmo AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin −41.6% Weaker than the industry Industry: 6.6%
- Returns · return on assets −23.9% Weaker than the industry Industry: 13.1%
- Solidity · equity ratio 87.1% Better than the industry Industry: 39.5%
- Liquidity · current ratio 7.75 Better than the industry Industry: 1.54
- Growth · revenue growth 187.2% Better than the industry Industry: 6.5%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
47of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 44 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 2,691 of 4,818 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 4,144 of 7,318 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 11 and resilience 76 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Enmo AS is 4 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 4,812 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −41.6% (median 6.6%) and equity ratio 87.1% (median 39.5%).
How it has gone · 2024–2025
Revenue rose by 187 % from 2024 to 2025, to 1.1 MNOK. The operating margin fell from −38.4% in 2024 to −41.6% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 53.4% in 2024 to 87.1% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.4 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.7 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.4 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 933674169
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.100)
- Purpose
- Selge varer og tjenester innen programmering - og annet som naturlig sammenfaller med dette - samt deltakelse i andre selskaper, investeringer og nærliggende virksomhet.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 5 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 30 May 2024 2 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 22 June 2024
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Enmo AS has a score of 47 for 2025, rank 4,144 of 7,318 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 93 against peers, current ratio 7.75 against a median of 1.54. Solidity: percentile 91 against peers, equity ratio 87.1% against a median of 39.5%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 11 against peers, operating margin −41.6% against a median of 6.6%. Consistency: percentile 39 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −134.0 (median 9.1); financial costs as a share of debt 1.5% (median 0.8%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −37.4% (median 6.8%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −41.6% (median 6.6%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −134.0 (median 9.1); Financial costs as a share of debt 1.5% (median 0.8%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −37.4% (median 6.8%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −41.6% (median 6.6%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.5% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 11 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 91 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 93 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 65 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 39 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −41.6% | 6.6% |
| Profit margin | −37.4% | 6.8% |
| Return on assets | −23.9% | 13.1% |
| Equity ratio | 87.1% | 39.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.15 | 1.07 |
| Current ratio | 7.75 | 1.54 |
| Revenue growth | 187.2% | 6.5% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.22 MNOK | 0.79 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 47, Enmo AS does better than 44% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (4,818 companies) in 2025.
Score over time
Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
40 days | 46 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
19 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−4.1% | −9.3% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
89.7% | 56.5% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−134.0 | 9.1 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
1.5% | 0.8% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.0% | 0.3% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.0 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Enmo AS fell by 3.2 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.1 points. So the company did 3.3 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | −41.6% | 6.6% | −3.2 percentage points | +0.1 percentage points | −3.3 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Enmo AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Enmo AS fell 3.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −38.4% | −41.6% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Enmo AS fell 3.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −38.4% | −41.6% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Enmo AS fell 3.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −38.4% | −41.6% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Enmo AS fell 3.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −38.4% | −41.6% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Enmo AS fell 3.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −38.4% | −41.6% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Enmo AS fell 3.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | −38.4% | −41.6% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Enmo AS had an operating margin of −41.6% and an equity ratio of 87.1% in 2025, and ranks 4,144 of 7,318 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 187% and the equity ratio rose from 53.4% to 87.1%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 3 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.6 | 3 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Enmo AS?
The operating margin was −41.6% in 2025, against a median of 6.6% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −23.9%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Enmo AS?
The equity ratio was 87.1% in 2025 (median 39.5%). Debt-to-equity was 0.15 (median 1.07).
What is the liquidity of Enmo AS like?
The current ratio was 7.75 in 2025 (median 1.54).
How does Enmo AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Enmo AS ranks 4,144 of 7,318 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 2,691 of 4,818. Revenue changed by 187.2% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tkk Digital AS |  Lion |
1 MNOK | 18.9% | 66 |
| Scanditech Solutions AS |  Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 13.9% | 57 |
| Enmo AS (this company) |  Elephant |
1 MNOK | −41.6% | 47 |
| Anyone AS · same municipality |  Beaver |
1 MNOK | −7.6% | 14 |
| Geist AS | Lion |
1 MNOK | 86.6% | 76 |
| Paraply Ventures AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | −66.0% | 25 |
| Hive Autonomy AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | −2,587.3% | 3 |
| Reviver AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | −218.9% | 18 |
| Herland Utvikling AS | Lion |
1 MNOK | 40.1% | 83 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 4
- Largest owner
- 35.2% · top three 92.6%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Johan VU Holding AS · 35.2%
- David Lekve Holding AS · 29.6%
- MR. French AS · 27.8%
- Agilvo AS · 7.4%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2024–2025
| Key figure | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | 47 | |
| Rank | – | 4,144 | |
| Operating margin | −38.4% | −41.6% | |
| Return on assets | −19.5% | −23.9% | |
| Equity ratio | 53.4% | 87.1% | |
| Current ratio | 2.14 | 7.75 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 187.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.4 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.1 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Tax expense | – | – |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.7 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.7 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.4 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −0.1 MNOK | −0.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 6969130.
Further
Similar companies
- Cupo AS index 47, rank 4,136 · compare
- Løv Film AS index 47, rank 4,143 · compare
- Osirion AS index 47, rank 4,145 · compare
- Brent AS index 47, rank 4,147 · compare
- Brocon Management Systems AS index 47, rank 4,149 · compare
News and announcements
- 21 October 2026 Ny forretningsadresse (opens in a new tab) Source: Brønnøysundregistrene
From official sources: the Brønnøysund Register Centre, Oslo Børs NewsWeb and public agencies. We show the title, date and a link to the source. The link to a company, sector or municipality is automatic and may be wrong. Report a wrong link