JP Engineering AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
30of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 17 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 6,210 of 7,474 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 8,444 of 10,060 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 37 and resilience 21 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
JP Engineering AS is 21 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 7,470 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 2.8% (median 7.8%) and equity ratio 12.1% (median 43.1%).
Where it stands · 2025
We only have the accounts for 2025. The development shows once we have at least two years.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
JP Engineering AS has a score of 30 for 2025, rank 8,444 of 10,060 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 37 against peers, operating margin 2.8% against a median of 7.8%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 17 against peers, equity ratio 12.1% against a median of 43.1%. Consistency: percentile 26 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed? Based on: net working capital to revenue −19.6% (median −7.1%); current ratio 1.14 (median 1.71).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −19.6% (median −7.1%); Current ratio 1.14 (median 1.71).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.0% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 37 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 17 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 27 | weight 5% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 26 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 75%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 2.8% | 7.8% |
| Profit margin | 2.8% | 7.8% |
| Return on assets | 6.2% | 14.1% |
| Equity ratio | 12.1% | 43.1% |
| Debt-to-equity | 7.29 | 1.04 |
| Current ratio | 1.14 | 1.71 |
| Revenue growth | – | 6.9% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 30, JP Engineering AS does better than 17% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (7,474 companies) in 2025.
Score over time
Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
50 days | 44 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−19.6% | −7.1% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
55.2% | 57.8% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
– | 14.9 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.0% | 0.6% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.0% | 2.3% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.2 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of JP Engineering AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities, annual average | 99.0 | 108.8 | 127.9 | 146.4 | 158.3 | 155.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +9.8% | +9.9% | +17.5% | +14.5% | +8.1% | −1.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 2.8% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: advertising and market research (indeks (2021 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: advertising and market research, annual average | 99.4 | 113.5 | 108.3 | 106.9 | 110.7 | 126.1 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +35.1% | +14.2% | −4.6% | −1.3% | +3.6% | +13.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 2.8% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: other professional and technical activities, annual average | 98.3 | 121.6 | 139.4 | 131.0 | 139.1 | 158.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +29.9% | +23.7% | +14.6% | −6.0% | +6.2% | +13.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 2.8% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: architects and engineering (indeks (2021 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: architects and engineering, annual average | 100.0 | 103.6 | 107.5 | 111.2 | 114.7 | 119.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.2% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +4.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 2.8% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Oil price (export price of crude oil) (kr per fat)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil price (export price of crude oil), annual average | 609 | 979 | 877 | 859 | 708 | 881 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +61.1% | +60.8% | −10.5% | −2.0% | −17.6% | +24.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 2.8% | – |
Source: SSB (08799, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 2.8% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 2.8% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: architects and engineering (indeks)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: architects and engineering, annual average | 90.5 | 90.9 | 96.0 | 100.9 | 105.6 | 109.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +7.4% | +0.5% | +5.6% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 2.8% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
JP Engineering AS had an operating margin of 2.8% and an equity ratio of 12.1% in 2025, and ranks 8,444 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 0 MNOK and 1 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.9 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.3 | 1 MNOK |
| P/B | 2.3 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 0 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 0 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 0 MNOK |
| Equity value | 1 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −101% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (71.1): Engineering/Construction.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is JP Engineering AS?
The operating margin was 2.8% in 2025, against a median of 7.8% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 6.2%.
How solid is JP Engineering AS?
The equity ratio was 12.1% in 2025 (median 43.1%). Debt-to-equity was 7.29 (median 1.04).
What is the liquidity of JP Engineering AS like?
The current ratio was 1.14 in 2025 (median 1.71).
How does JP Engineering AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
JP Engineering AS ranks 8,444 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 6,210 of 7,474.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endgame Industries AS |  Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 19.8% | 55 |
| E Askeland AS | Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 94.2% | 65 |
| Krishnan Consulting AS |  Lion |
1 MNOK | 31.0% | 64 |
| Veshovda Gjerdesystem AS |  Elephant |
1 MNOK | −0.5% | 38 |
| Brabrand Teknologiutvikling AS | Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 17.7% | 68 |
| Crane Norway Engineering AS | Lion |
1 MNOK | 51.5% | 76 |
| JP Engineering AS (this company) |  Beaver |
1 MNOK | 2.8% | 30 |
| UTLEIE & Konsulenttjenester AS | Elephant |
1 MNOK | −17.8% | 36 |
| JE Defence AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | −1.1% | 27 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 935495172
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (71.129)
- Purpose
- Bemanning, ingeniørkonsultasjon.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 0.9 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 1 May 2025 1 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Børeringen 20, 4085 HUNDVÅG (STAVANGER)
- Municipality
- Stavanger rank 5 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 14 May 2025
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 6 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year
Trends appear once there is more than one fiscal year.
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.5 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.1 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.4 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.4 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6478341.
Further
Similar companies
- Lokalkalenderen AS index 30, rank 8,440 · compare
- Fenix Repower AS index 30, rank 8,441 · compare
- Tyark AS index 30, rank 8,442 · compare
- T-Well AS index 30, rank 8,443 · compare
- Remaco AS index 29, rank 8,446 · compare