Full-Stack Development AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
57of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 64 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 1,549 of 4,290 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 2,371 of 6,719 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 89 and resilience 21 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Full-Stack Development AS is 6 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 4,284 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 41.1% (median 6.4%) and equity ratio 5.4% (median 38.7%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 41.1% | 6.4% |
| Profit margin | 41.1% | 6.5% |
| Return on assets | 68.1% | 13.1% |
| Equity ratio | 5.4% | 38.7% |
| Debt-to-equity | 17.51 | 1.09 |
| Current ratio | 1.06 | 1.53 |
| Revenue growth | – | 7.3% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 57, Full-Stack Development AS does better than 64% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (4,290 companies) in 2025.
Score over time
Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
coming | – | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
coming | – | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−57.1% | −9.5% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
99.9% | 57.1% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
1,800.9 | 8.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.0% | 0.8% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 0.2% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.7 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Receivable days and inventory are shown once older accounts have been read again from the raw data. This happens by itself, without new calls to the Brønnøysund Register Centre.
Full-Stack Development AS has a score of 57 for 2025, rank 2,371 of 6,719 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 89 against peers, operating margin 41.1% against a median of 6.4%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 14 against peers, equity ratio 5.4% against a median of 38.7%. Liquidity: percentile 28 against peers, current ratio 1.06 against a median of 1.53.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 5.4% (median 38.7%).
- Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed? Based on: net working capital to revenue −57.1% (median −9.5%); current ratio 1.06 (median 1.53).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak liquidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Full-Stack Development AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 41.1% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 41.1% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 41.1% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 41.1% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 102.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 41.1% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 41.1% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Full-Stack Development AS had an operating margin of 41.1% and an equity ratio of 5.4% in 2025, and ranks 2,371 of 6,719 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 0 MNOK and 6 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | 5 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | 6 MNOK |
| P/B | 3.6 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 8 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 5 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −1 MNOK |
| Equity value | 6 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 5.4% (median 38.7%).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −57.1% (median −9.5%); Current ratio 1.06 (median 1.53).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.0% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 4.6%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 89 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 14 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 28 | weight 5% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 32 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 75%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Full-Stack Development AS?
The operating margin was 41.1% in 2025, against a median of 6.4% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 68.1%.
How solid is Full-Stack Development AS?
The equity ratio was 5.4% in 2025 (median 38.7%). Debt-to-equity was 17.51 (median 1.09).
What is the liquidity of Full-Stack Development AS like?
The current ratio was 1.06 in 2025 (median 1.53).
How does Full-Stack Development AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Full-Stack Development AS ranks 2,371 of 6,719 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 1,549 of 4,290.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Barsten AS · same municipality |  Lion |
1 MNOK | 48.3% | 64 |
| Idlewild Semiconductor AS · same municipality | Lion |
1 MNOK | 34.5% | 73 |
| Bommelom AS |  Beaver |
1 MNOK | 7.8% | 42 |
| Handleit AS |  Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 52.3% | 64 |
| Plibonigi AS | Lion |
1 MNOK | 11.9% | 57 |
| Full-Stack Development AS (this company) | Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 41.1% | 57 |
| Grinnemo Handel AS | Lion |
1 MNOK | 9.0% | 69 |
| Kreativ 3D AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | −3.3% | 31 |
| Kodepar AS | Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 24.5% | 65 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
3 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Haakestad Holding AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Haakestad Holding AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (2 companies) 2 of 3 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Negative equity
- 1 company: Haakestad Holding AS
- Loss
- 1 company: Haakestad Holding AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company joined the group: Full-Stack Development AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Haakestad Holding AS
- Full-Stack Development AS you are here
- Org. no. 933101282
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 935608031
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.200)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 16 April 2025 1 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Underhaugsveien 11A, 0354 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 2 June 2025
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 6 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 0%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Haakestad Holding AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner Haakestad Holding AS (holds 100%) had negative equity in 2025. made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Haakestad Holding AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year
Trends appear once there is more than one fiscal year.
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.5 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.5 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.4 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.8 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.8 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.0 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6582051.
Further
Similar companies
- Hanne Krogh Productions AS index 57, rank 2,368 · compare
- Integra Solutions AS index 57, rank 2,369 · compare
- Tidya AS index 57, rank 2,372 · compare
- JAH CONSULT & Invest AS index 57, rank 2,377 · compare
- Cavelabs AS index 57, rank 2,378 · compare